Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Austin Rapp

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Communications

8 pending office actions • 2 clients • 8 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 51 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

AUSTIN RAPP focuses on Networking & Security, with 2212 career applications in its portfolio. The firm's resolved allowance rate pct is 78.4. This figure provides a clear baseline for the success rate in this technology area. The 78.4 percent allowance rate is a primary metric for evaluating the firm's historical performance in securing patent grants. Practitioners can use this percentage to understand the firm's track record across its career filings.

There are 9 pending office actions currently being managed. The firm averages 3.38 office actions per allowance, which serves as a performance metric for its prosecution efficiency. This 3.38 average helps in setting expectations for the number of interactions required to reach a final decision. With 2212 applications in its history, the firm has a documented record of performance. The 9 pending office actions represent the current volume of active matters the firm is pursuing.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=2212 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

78.4%
Allowance Rate
n=2212
+0.28σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=2212
3.4
OAs to Allowance
n=1379
+0.04σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1379
1215 days
Time to Allowance
n=1379
+14.9pp
Interview Lift
n=2212
25.7%
RCE Rate
n=2212
1.9%
Appeal Rate
n=2212

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

80.3%
§101 Overcome
n=142
75.8%
§102 Overcome
n=483
78.5%
§103 Overcome
n=866
82.7%
§112 Overcome
n=364

Specialization & Scale

H04L, H04W, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
29%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=2212
1
Practitioners
n=2212
2212.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=2212

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (12%)
6
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (12%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (12%)
§103 only4 (50%)
§102 only2 (25%)
No statute on record1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
6
Information Tech
75% of docket
2
Communications
25% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GUILLERMETY, JUAN M 1 72.6% +14.1%
CHIO, TAT CHI 1 72.9% +17.6%
BEYEN, ZEWDU A 1 83.5% +14.8%
ORGAD, EDAN 1 39.7% -0.4%
AHMED, ABDULLAHI 1 85.8% +2.1%
ALAWDI, SHEHAB A 1 83.3% -18.5%
OLALEYE, OLADIRAN GIDEON 1 74.8% +15.4%
BEAMER, TEMICA M 1 88.4% +4.2%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18476163 RRC IDLE MODE TRANSITION FOR NON-TERRESTRIAL NETWORK CELL BEAMER, TEMICA M 9d
18913704 AMBIENT INTERNET OF THINGS CONTENTION BASED RANDOM ACCESS WITH DUPLICATE PAGING IN A 3-STEP RANDOM ACCESS PROCEDURE BEYEN, ZEWDU A —
18783270 NARROWBAND INTERNET OF THINGS NARROWBAND PHYSICAL UPLINK SHARED CHANNEL ORTHOGONAL COVER CODE (OCC) SUPPORT WITH DYNAMIC OCC ON/OFF AND OCC MULTIPLEXING FACTOR INDICATION AHMED, ABDULLAHI —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18928924 SOFTWARE-AS-A-SERVICE DEPLOYMENT OF PRINTER DRIVERS AND PRINTER PROFILES GUILLERMETY, JUAN M —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18476045 RRC IDLE MODE TRANSITION FOR NON-TERRESTRIAL NETWORK CELL OLALEYE, OLADIRAN GIDEON 9d overdue
18928924 SOFTWARE-AS-A-SERVICE DEPLOYMENT OF PRINTER DRIVERS AND PRINTER PROFILES GUILLERMETY, JUAN M —
18913739 AMBIENT INTERNET OF THINGS CONTENTION BASED RANDOM ACCESS WITH NEW AND DUPLICATE PAGING DETECTION IN A 2-STEP RANDOM ACCESS PROCEDURE CHIO, TAT CHI —
18913704 AMBIENT INTERNET OF THINGS CONTENTION BASED RANDOM ACCESS WITH DUPLICATE PAGING IN A 3-STEP RANDOM ACCESS PROCEDURE BEYEN, ZEWDU A —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Sharp 7
Vasion, Inc. 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26821
24861
24611
24141
24751
24661
24721
26461

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18928924 SOFTWARE-AS-A-SERVICE DEPLOYMENT OF PRINTER DRIVERS AND PRINTER PROFILES Vasion, Inc. GUILLERMETY, JUAN M 2682 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 28, 2024
18913739 AMBIENT INTERNET OF THINGS CONTENTION BASED RANDOM ACCESS WITH NEW AND DUPLICATE PAGING DETECTION IN A 2-STEP RANDOM ACCESS PROCEDURE Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha CHIO, TAT CHI 2486 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 11, 2024
18913704 AMBIENT INTERNET OF THINGS CONTENTION BASED RANDOM ACCESS WITH DUPLICATE PAGING IN A 3-STEP RANDOM ACCESS PROCEDURE Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha BEYEN, ZEWDU A 2461 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 11, 2024
18902116 TRIGGERING CONDITIONS FOR DUPLICATE PAGING MESSAGE TRANSMISSION Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha ORGAD, EDAN 2414 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 30, 2024
18783270 NARROWBAND INTERNET OF THINGS NARROWBAND PHYSICAL UPLINK SHARED CHANNEL ORTHOGONAL COVER CODE (OCC) SUPPORT WITH DYNAMIC OCC ON/OFF AND OCC MULTIPLEXING FACTOR INDICATION Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha AHMED, ABDULLAHI 2475 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 24, 2024
18405662 DOWNLINK COVERAGE WITH BEAM GROUPS FOR NON-TERRESTRIAL NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha ALAWDI, SHEHAB A 2466 — Non-Final OA 76d Pending Jan 05, 2024
18476045 RRC IDLE MODE TRANSITION FOR NON-TERRESTRIAL NETWORK CELL Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha OLALEYE, OLADIRAN GIDEON 2472 §103 Non-Final OA 9d overdue Pending Sep 27, 2023
18476163 RRC IDLE MODE TRANSITION FOR NON-TERRESTRIAL NETWORK CELL Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha BEAMER, TEMICA M 2646 §103 Non-Final OA 9d Pending Sep 27, 2023

Managing Austin Rapp's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month