Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Bond Schoeneck & King Pllc - Buffalo

Technology areas: Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

10 pending office actions • 1 client • 10 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 16 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Bond Schoeneck & King PLLC - Buffalo focuses on Communications, where it has filed 5421 career applications. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 86.38 percent, establishing a solid track record of success. At present, the firm is handling 6 pending office actions relative to its 5421 career applications.

The firm's prosecution efficiency is characterized by an average of 3.49 office actions per allowance. This 3.49 average indicates a detailed and sometimes lengthy negotiation process with examiners. For practitioners, the 5421 career applications provide a significant data set for understanding the firm's performance. The 86.38 percent resolved allowance rate and the 3.49 office actions per allowance metric offer a comprehensive view of the firm's prosecution strategy and its effectiveness in securing patent grants. The 6 pending office actions represent the firm's current workload and its ongoing commitment to its clients.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=5421 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

86.4%
Allowance Rate
n=5421
+0.56σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=5421
3.5
OAs to Allowance
n=3077
-0.02σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=3077
1099 days
Time to Allowance
n=3077
+8.8pp
Interview Lift
n=5421
30.6%
RCE Rate
n=5421
0.9%
Appeal Rate
n=5421

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

74.7%
§101 Overcome
n=292
76.2%
§102 Overcome
n=1526
77.7%
§103 Overcome
n=2178
80.7%
§112 Overcome
n=1647

Specialization & Scale

A61B, A61M, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
14%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=5421
9
Practitioners
n=5421
602.3
Apps / Practitioner
n=5421

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (20%)
7
Medium (70%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (10%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (10%)
§103 only5 (50%)
§102 only2 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (10%)
No statute on record1 (10%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
10% of docket
6
Communications
60% of docket
2
Semiconductors
20% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
10% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HOQUE, FARHANA AKHTER 1 86.0% +11.3%
LAO, LUNSEE 1 75.7% +15.9%
JIMENEZ, ANTHONY R 1 88.2% +7.0%
VOGEL, JAY L. 1 79.3% +24.5%
GANMAVO, KUASSI A 1 70.6% +20.2%
FAHNERT, FRIEDRICH 1 84.1% +12.3%
SAUNDERS JR, JOSEPH 1 73.3% +20.6%
MORSE, CASON HENSON 1 66.7% +3.3%
CHIN, VIVIAN C 1 13.9% +13.8%
RINEHART, SEAN MICHAEL 1 68.0% +50.0%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18771449 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENGINE SOUND ENHANCEMENT FAHNERT, FRIEDRICH 63d
18948837 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CAPACITIVE ON-HEAD DETECTION HOQUE, FARHANA AKHTER —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18465691 ORIENTATION SENSOR AXIAL SELF-CALIBRATION CHIN, VIVIAN C 17d overdue
18929855 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING CAPACITIVE SENSING TO DEBOUNCE A MECHANICAL BUTTON JIMENEZ, ANTHONY R —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18465691 ORIENTATION SENSOR AXIAL SELF-CALIBRATION CHIN, VIVIAN C 17d overdue
18422269 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SYNCHRONIZING A PLURALITY OF ISOCHRONOUS STREAMS SAUNDERS JR, JOSEPH 22d
18777128 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BROADCASTING AUDIO GANMAVO, KUASSI A 56d
18771449 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENGINE SOUND ENHANCEMENT FAHNERT, FRIEDRICH 63d
18948837 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CAPACITIVE ON-HEAD DETECTION HOQUE, FARHANA AKHTER —
18947513 LOCATION-BASED SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INITIATING WIRELESS DEVICE ACTION LAO, LUNSEE —
18817495 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SYNCHRONIZING TRANSMISSION OF WIRELESS DATA VOGEL, JAY L. —
18330720 MULTIPLEXING APPLICATION CHANNELS ON ISOCHRONOUS STREAMS RINEHART, SEAN MICHAEL —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Bose 10

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26923
28581
26911
28311
24171
26951
26941

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18948837 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CAPACITIVE ON-HEAD DETECTION BOSE CORPORATION HOQUE, FARHANA AKHTER 2858 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 15, 2024
18947513 LOCATION-BASED SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INITIATING WIRELESS DEVICE ACTION BOSE CORPORATION LAO, LUNSEE 2691 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Nov 14, 2024
18929855 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING CAPACITIVE SENSING TO DEBOUNCE A MECHANICAL BUTTON BOSE CORPORATION JIMENEZ, ANTHONY R 2831 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 29, 2024
18817495 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SYNCHRONIZING TRANSMISSION OF WIRELESS DATA BOSE CORPORATION VOGEL, JAY L. Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 28, 2024
18777128 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BROADCASTING AUDIO BOSE CORPORATION GANMAVO, KUASSI A 2692 §103 Final Rejection 56d Pending Jul 18, 2024
18771449 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENGINE SOUND ENHANCEMENT BOSE CORPORATION FAHNERT, FRIEDRICH 2692 §103 Final Rejection 63d Pending Jul 12, 2024
18422269 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SYNCHRONIZING A PLURALITY OF ISOCHRONOUS STREAMS BOSE CORPORATION SAUNDERS JR, JOSEPH 2692 §102 Final Rejection 22d Pending Jan 25, 2024
18542010 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREVENTING TEMPORAL OVERLAP BETWEEN DATA PACKETS OF BROADCAST STREAMS BOSE CORPORATION MORSE, CASON HENSON 2417 §103 Final Rejection 19d overdue Pending Dec 15, 2023
18465691 ORIENTATION SENSOR AXIAL SELF-CALIBRATION BOSE CORPORATION CHIN, VIVIAN C 2695 §101 Final Rejection 17d overdue Pending Sep 12, 2023
18330720 MULTIPLEXING APPLICATION CHANNELS ON ISOCHRONOUS STREAMS BOSE CORPORATION RINEHART, SEAN MICHAEL 2694 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 07, 2023

Managing Bond Schoeneck & King Pllc - Buffalo's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month