Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

C. Tumey Law Group Pllc

Technology area: Networking & Security

15 pending office actions • 6 clients • 15 examiners • 13 art units • 0 of 15 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

C. Tumey Law Group PLLC reports 16 pending office actions in Networking & Security and 1456 career applications. Its resolved allowance rate is 78.85%, with an average of 3.83 office actions per allowance.

The historical application base gives context to the resolution rate, while the pending docket indicates ongoing examination work. The office-action average describes the response intensity associated with matters reaching allowance. For prosecution planning, these measures together show both current workload and the effort reflected in the firm’s completed record.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1456 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

78.8%
Allowance Rate
n=1456
+0.34σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1456
3.8
OAs to Allowance
n=589
+0.18σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=589
891 days
Time to Allowance
n=589
-1.9pp
Interview Lift
n=1456
44.4%
RCE Rate
n=1456
2.1%
Appeal Rate
n=1456

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

33.0%
§101 Overcome
n=94
58.6%
§102 Overcome
n=403
57.6%
§103 Overcome
n=707
59.2%
§112 Overcome
n=480

Specialization & Scale

E21B, C10G, G01V
Top CPC Subclasses
24%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1456
2
Practitioners
n=1456
728.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1456

Portfolio Summary

15
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (40%)
6
Medium (40%)
1
Easy (7%)
2
Unknown (13%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only5 (33%)
§102 only1 (7%)
§112 only1 (7%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (40%)
No statute on record2 (13%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
13% of docket
10
Information Tech
67% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
7% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
13% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

150 h
Manual time on pending OAs
30 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
52 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KUMAR, RAKESH 1 57.2% +28.2%
DALENCOURT, YVES 1 84.2% -5.5%
KASSA, ELIZABETH 1 80.3% -5.7%
NAVARRO, HUGO IVAN 1 62.5% +16.7%
YIMER, GETENTE A 1 88.3% +8.2%
ZONG, RUOLEI 1 86.9% +12.1%
TODD, GREGORY G 1 38.7% -3.0%
O'HERN, BRENT T 1 78.5% +19.4%
RAZA, MUHAMMAD A 1 56.1% +68.7%
CHANG, TOM Y 1 53.4% +20.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19241816 HOSTNAME PRE-LOCALIZATION DALENCOURT, YVES —

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19303098 APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED MEDICATION DISPENSING DEVICES KUMAR, RAKESH —
19182172 PACKET PROCESSING OF STREAMING CONTENT IN A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK KASSA, ELIZABETH —
19070074 REMOTE VERIFICATION OF CALIBRATION NAVARRO, HUGO IVAN —
18961965 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LOG PROCESSING AND CONTENT DISTRIBUTION NETWORK OPTIMIZATION TODD, GREGORY G —
18824604 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK CHANG, TOM Y —
18271188 PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE-CONTAINING TABLET, PREPARATION METHOD AND USE TOWNSLEY, SARA ELIZABETH —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19303098 APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED MEDICATION DISPENSING DEVICES KUMAR, RAKESH —
19070074 REMOTE VERIFICATION OF CALIBRATION NAVARRO, HUGO IVAN —
19017348 CDN-BASED CLIENT MESSAGING ZONG, RUOLEI —
18927173 PHOSPHATES-FREE WATER HOLDING AGENT RICH IN AMINO ACIDS AND USE THEREOF IN EMULSIFIED MEAT PRODUCTS O'HERN, BRENT T —
18898151 FRONT-END OPTIMIZATION IN A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK (CDN) RAZA, MUHAMMAD A —
18824604 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK CHANG, TOM Y —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
24572
24412
36511
28581
21811
24431
17931
24491
24551
24441

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19303098 APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED MEDICATION DISPENSING DEVICES Rxmatics LLC KUMAR, RAKESH 3651 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 18, 2025
19241816 HOSTNAME PRE-LOCALIZATION Sandpiper Cdn, LLC DALENCOURT, YVES 2457 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 18, 2025
19182172 PACKET PROCESSING OF STREAMING CONTENT IN A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK Sandpiper Cdn, LLC KASSA, ELIZABETH 2457 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 17, 2025
19070074 REMOTE VERIFICATION OF CALIBRATION Pipeline Supply & Service, LLC NAVARRO, HUGO IVAN 2858 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 04, 2025
19030193 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONFIGURATION OF SEQUENCE HANDLERS Sandpiper Cdn, LLC YIMER, GETENTE A 2181 Other Final Rejection — Pending Jan 17, 2025
19017348 CDN-BASED CLIENT MESSAGING Sandpiper Cdn, LLC ZONG, RUOLEI 2441 Other Final Rejection — Pending Jan 10, 2025
18961965 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LOG PROCESSING AND CONTENT DISTRIBUTION NETWORK OPTIMIZATION Sandpiper Cdn, LLC TODD, GREGORY G 2443 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 27, 2024
18927173 PHOSPHATES-FREE WATER HOLDING AGENT RICH IN AMINO ACIDS AND USE THEREOF IN EMULSIFIED MEAT PRODUCTS Northeast Agricultural University O'HERN, BRENT T 1793 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 25, 2024
18898151 FRONT-END OPTIMIZATION IN A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK (CDN) Sandpiper Cdn, LLC RAZA, MUHAMMAD A 2449 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Sep 26, 2024
18824604 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK Sandpiper Cdn, LLC CHANG, TOM Y 2455 §102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 04, 2024
18805934 TIME AND LOCATION-BASED TREND PREDICTION IN A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK (CDN) Sandpiper Cdn, LLC FIORILLO, JAMES N 2444 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 15, 2024
18786086 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTENT SERVER RENDEZVOUS IN A DUAL STACK PROTOCOL NETWORK Sandpiper Cdn, LLC ALGIBHAH, HAMZA N 2441 §103 Final Rejection 41d Pending Jul 26, 2024
18772505 REQUEST PROCESSING IN A CONTENT DELIVERY FRAMEWORK Sandpiper Cdn, LLC BAROT, BHARAT 2453 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 15, 2024
18271188 PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE-CONTAINING TABLET, PREPARATION METHOD AND USE Hq Pharma (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. TOWNSLEY, SARA ELIZABETH 1629 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 06, 2023
17984753 Touchless Dispensing And Communication For Machines Trinity Axis Inc. WAGGONER, TIMOTHY R 3655 §112 Final Rejection 72d Pending Nov 10, 2022

Managing C. Tumey Law Group Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is C. Tumey Law Group Pllc's patent allowance rate?

78.8% of resolved applications prosecuted by C. Tumey Law Group Pllc were allowed, across 1,456 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does C. Tumey Law Group Pllc average before allowance?

3.83 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does C. Tumey Law Group Pllc have?

15 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 6 clients, before 15 examiners in 13 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month