Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

C. Tumey Law Group Pllc

Technology area: Networking & Security

18 pending office actions • 9 clients • 18 examiners • 11 art units • 0 of 18 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

C. Tumey Law Group PLLC operates in the Networking & Security technology area, where it has processed 1453 career applications. This volume of work reflects a significant level of experience in the high-tech patent landscape. The firm is currently handling 12 pending office actions, which constitutes its active workload in this sector. These figures indicate a firm with a solid historical foundation and ongoing activity.

The firm reports a resolved allowance rate pct of 78.95, showing a consistent ability to secure patent grants for its clients. This rate is achieved with an avg_office_actions_per_allowance of 3.83, suggesting that the prosecution process often requires several rounds of communication with the USPTO. The 78.95 resolved allowance rate pct is a key metric of the firm's success in the Networking & Security field. With 1453 career applications, the 3.83 avg_office_actions_per_allowance provides a benchmark for the expected duration of the examination phase. These statistics offer a clear view of the firm's performance and its capacity to manage patent portfolios.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1453 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

79.0%
Allowance Rate
n=1453
+0.34σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1453
3.8
OAs to Allowance
n=585
+0.18σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=585
890 days
Time to Allowance
n=585
-1.8pp
Interview Lift
n=1453
44.9%
RCE Rate
n=1453
2.2%
Appeal Rate
n=1453

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

33.0%
§101 Overcome
n=94
58.3%
§102 Overcome
n=403
57.8%
§103 Overcome
n=699
59.5%
§112 Overcome
n=474

Specialization & Scale

E21B, C10G, G01V
Top CPC Subclasses
24%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1453
2
Practitioners
n=1453
726.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=1453

Portfolio Summary

18
Total Pending OAs
13
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

10
Hard (56%)
6
Medium (33%)
2
Easy (11%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (6%)
§103 only6 (33%)
§112 only1 (6%)
Double-patenting only1 (6%)
Multi-statute (no §101)9 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
17% of docket
5
Information Tech
28% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
6% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
11% of docket
7
Business / Other
39% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

180 h
Manual time on pending OAs
36 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
63 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
JACOBS-BURTON, LASHONDA T 1 91.3% -12.9%
KASSA, ELIZABETH 1 80.2% -5.5%
AMBAYE, SAMUEL 1 82.4% +25.1%
MCANDREW, CHRISTOPHER P 1 85.9% +13.9%
RAJAPUTRA, SURESH KS 1 83.6% +13.3%
LI, YONGHONG 1 76.5% +22.0%
TODD, GREGORY G 1 38.6% -2.7%
O'HERN, BRENT T 1 78.5% +19.8%
RAZA, MUHAMMAD A 1 56.1% +68.7%
CHANG, TOM Y 1 53.4% +20.0%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19204205 NETWORK ADDRESS RESOLUTION JACOBS-BURTON, LASHONDA T —
19096354 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURING A QUANTUM-SAFE DIGITAL NETWORK ENVIRONMENT AMBAYE, SAMUEL —

Hard Cases (10)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18407573 Lipstick Use And Application CRAIGO, WILLIAM A 26d overdue
18485100 Fuel Delivery Service ALLEN, WILLIAM J 17d overdue
19182172 PACKET PROCESSING OF STREAMING CONTENT IN A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK KASSA, ELIZABETH —
19099572 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETECTING SHOCK AND VIBRATION STATES IN A MAGNETOSTRICTIVE TRANSDUCER MCANDREW, CHRISTOPHER P —
18965229 Circuit arrangement for evaluating an output signal, and sensor device RAJAPUTRA, SURESH KS —
18964958 Antenna arrangement for a radar sensor LI, YONGHONG —
18961965 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LOG PROCESSING AND CONTENT DISTRIBUTION NETWORK OPTIMIZATION TODD, GREGORY G —
18824604 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK CHANG, TOM Y —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19096354 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURING A QUANTUM-SAFE DIGITAL NETWORK ENVIRONMENT AMBAYE, SAMUEL —
19099572 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETECTING SHOCK AND VIBRATION STATES IN A MAGNETOSTRICTIVE TRANSDUCER MCANDREW, CHRISTOPHER P —
18965229 Circuit arrangement for evaluating an output signal, and sensor device RAJAPUTRA, SURESH KS —
18964958 Antenna arrangement for a radar sensor LI, YONGHONG —
18927173 PHOSPHATES-FREE WATER HOLDING AGENT RICH IN AMINO ACIDS AND USE THEREOF IN EMULSIFIED MEAT PRODUCTS O'HERN, BRENT T —
18898151 FRONT-END OPTIMIZATION IN A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK (CDN) RAZA, MUHAMMAD A —
18824604 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK CHANG, TOM Y —

Client Portfolio (9 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28581
24491
24551
24441
24411
24531
16151
36191
16291
36551

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19204205 NETWORK ADDRESS RESOLUTION Sandpiper Cdn, LLC JACOBS-BURTON, LASHONDA T DP Non-Final OA — Pending May 09, 2025
19182172 PACKET PROCESSING OF STREAMING CONTENT IN A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK Sandpiper Cdn, LLC KASSA, ELIZABETH §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 17, 2025
19096354 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURING A QUANTUM-SAFE DIGITAL NETWORK ENVIRONMENT Qds Holdings Inc. AMBAYE, SAMUEL §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 31, 2025
19099572 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETECTING SHOCK AND VIBRATION STATES IN A MAGNETOSTRICTIVE TRANSDUCER Balluff GmbH MCANDREW, CHRISTOPHER P 2858 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 29, 2025
18965229 Circuit arrangement for evaluating an output signal, and sensor device Balluff GmbH RAJAPUTRA, SURESH KS §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 02, 2024
18964958 Antenna arrangement for a radar sensor Balluff GmbH LI, YONGHONG §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 02, 2024
18961965 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LOG PROCESSING AND CONTENT DISTRIBUTION NETWORK OPTIMIZATION Sandpiper Cdn, LLC TODD, GREGORY G §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 27, 2024
18927173 PHOSPHATES-FREE WATER HOLDING AGENT RICH IN AMINO ACIDS AND USE THEREOF IN EMULSIFIED MEAT PRODUCTS Northeast Agricultural University O'HERN, BRENT T §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 25, 2024
18898151 FRONT-END OPTIMIZATION IN A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK (CDN) Sandpiper Cdn, LLC RAZA, MUHAMMAD A 2449 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Sep 26, 2024
18824604 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK Sandpiper Cdn, LLC CHANG, TOM Y 2455 §102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 04, 2024
18805934 TIME AND LOCATION-BASED TREND PREDICTION IN A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK (CDN) Sandpiper Cdn, LLC FIORILLO, JAMES N 2444 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 15, 2024
18786086 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTENT SERVER RENDEZVOUS IN A DUAL STACK PROTOCOL NETWORK Sandpiper Cdn, LLC ALGIBHAH, HAMZA N 2441 §103 Final Rejection 41d Pending Jul 26, 2024
18772505 REQUEST PROCESSING IN A CONTENT DELIVERY FRAMEWORK Sandpiper Cdn, LLC BAROT, BHARAT 2453 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 15, 2024
18407573 Lipstick Use And Application Kinky Kitty, LLC CRAIGO, WILLIAM A 1615 §102§103 Non-Final OA 26d overdue Pending Jan 09, 2024
18485100 Fuel Delivery Service Gas To Go LLC ALLEN, WILLIAM J 3619 §101 Non-Final OA 17d overdue Pending Oct 11, 2023
18271188 PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE-CONTAINING TABLET, PREPARATION METHOD AND USE Hq Pharma (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. TOWNSLEY, SARA ELIZABETH 1629 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 06, 2023
17984753 Touchless Dispensing And Communication For Machines Trinity Axis Inc. WAGGONER, TIMOTHY R 3655 §112 Final Rejection 72d Pending Nov 10, 2022
17851523 Method Of Preparing Functional Polymers Merichem Company LOEWE, ROBERT S 1763 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 28, 2022

Managing C. Tumey Law Group Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month