Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Eversheds Sutherland (Us) LLP Am

Technology area: Communications

9 pending office actions • 2 clients • 9 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 136 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP Am focuses on the Communications technology area with 8 pending office actions currently under review. This portfolio benefits from the firm's total experience of 10974 career applications. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate pct of 90.45, which reflects its historical success in securing patent rights across various sectors.

The avg office actions per allowance of 3.63 indicates the typical level of examiner engagement required to reach a grant. For the 8 pending office actions in the Communications sector, this average suggests a standard prosecution cycle. The firm's 90.45 resolved allowance rate pct remains a key metric for evaluating its effectiveness in this technology space.

Practitioners can use the 3.63 avg office actions per allowance to estimate the resources needed for the 8 pending office actions. The 10974 career applications provide a robust statistical foundation for the firm's 90.45 resolved allowance rate pct.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=11003 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

90.5%
Allowance Rate
n=11003
+0.67σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=11003
3.6
OAs to Allowance
n=7677
-0.03σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=7677
1063 days
Time to Allowance
n=7677
+7.5pp
Interview Lift
n=11003
30.6%
RCE Rate
n=11003
2.2%
Appeal Rate
n=11003

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

87.8%
§101 Overcome
n=975
84.5%
§102 Overcome
n=3263
85.8%
§103 Overcome
n=5334
85.6%
§112 Overcome
n=3316

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G06Q, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
12%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=11003
12
Practitioners
n=11003
916.9
Apps / Practitioner
n=11003

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (56%)
4
Medium (44%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (22%)
§103 only4 (44%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
11% of docket
6
Communications
67% of docket
1
Semiconductors
11% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
11% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ROMANO, ASHLEY K 1 78.3% +8.2%
OGUNBIYI, OLUWADAMILOL M 1 77.1% +19.4%
MCLEAN, IAN SCOTT 1 43.3% +32.1%
SHIN, SEONG-AH A 1 78.5% +21.3%
AKHAVANNIK, HADI 1 85.9% +13.1%
SHAH, PARAS D 1 73.4% +31.0%
TERRELL, EMILY C 1 58.7% +35.7%
ONDRASIK, JOHN PAUL 1 53.6% +49.8%
NABI, REZA U 1 82.8% +22.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18434291 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRAINING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS USING EMULATED DATASETS AKHAVANNIK, HADI —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18674519 NOISE CANCELLATION FOR OPEN MICROPHONE MODE MCLEAN, IAN SCOTT 3d overdue
18791215 MOBILE MANIPULATION ROBOTIC SYSTEM ROMANO, ASHLEY K —
18656086 Providing Content on Multiple Devices OGUNBIYI, OLUWADAMILOL M —
18652614 ROUTING NATURAL LANGUAGE COMMANDS TO THE APPROPRIATE APPLICATIONS SHIN, SEONG-AH A —
17347265 MOBILE DEVICE INTERFACES NABI, REZA U —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18056540 AUTOMATIC INSPECTION AND LOCKING FOR AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION ONDRASIK, JOHN PAUL 119d overdue
18674519 NOISE CANCELLATION FOR OPEN MICROPHONE MODE MCLEAN, IAN SCOTT 3d overdue
18514376 Architecture for a Hub Configured to Control a Second Device While a Connection to a Remote System is Unavailable SHAH, PARAS D 71d
18656086 Providing Content on Multiple Devices OGUNBIYI, OLUWADAMILOL M —
18652614 ROUTING NATURAL LANGUAGE COMMANDS TO THE APPROPRIATE APPLICATIONS SHIN, SEONG-AH A —
18434291 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRAINING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS USING EMULATED DATASETS AKHAVANNIK, HADI —
18007692 AUTOMATED VERIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS RELATED TO ACCOUNTS WITHIN A SERVICE PROVIDER NETWORK TERRELL, EMILY C —
17347265 MOBILE DEVICE INTERFACES NABI, REZA U —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Amazon 8
Rightbot Technologies, Inc. 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26532
26541
26591
26641
26661
28591
21001

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18791215 MOBILE MANIPULATION ROBOTIC SYSTEM Rightbot Technologies, Inc. ROMANO, ASHLEY K §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 31, 2024
18656086 Providing Content on Multiple Devices Amazon Technologies, Inc. OGUNBIYI, OLUWADAMILOL M 2653 §101Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 22, 2024
18674519 NOISE CANCELLATION FOR OPEN MICROPHONE MODE Amazon Technologies, Inc. MCLEAN, IAN SCOTT 2654 §102§103 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending May 24, 2024
18652614 ROUTING NATURAL LANGUAGE COMMANDS TO THE APPROPRIATE APPLICATIONS Amazon Technologies, Inc. SHIN, SEONG-AH A 2659 §101Other Final Rejection — Pending May 01, 2024
18434291 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRAINING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS USING EMULATED DATASETS Amazon Technologies, Inc. AKHAVANNIK, HADI 2664 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 06, 2024
18514376 Architecture for a Hub Configured to Control a Second Device While a Connection to a Remote System is Unavailable Amazon Technologies, Inc. SHAH, PARAS D 2653 §103 Non-Final OA 71d Pending Nov 20, 2023
18007692 AUTOMATED VERIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS RELATED TO ACCOUNTS WITHIN A SERVICE PROVIDER NETWORK Amazon Technologies, Inc. TERRELL, EMILY C 2666 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 01, 2022
18056540 AUTOMATIC INSPECTION AND LOCKING FOR AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION Amazon Technologies, Inc. ONDRASIK, JOHN PAUL 2859 §103 Final Rejection 119d overdue Pending Nov 17, 2022
17347265 MOBILE DEVICE INTERFACES Amazon Technologies, Inc. NABI, REZA U 2100 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 14, 2021

Managing Eversheds Sutherland (Us) LLP Am's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month