Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

12 pending office actions • 5 clients • 12 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP manages a portfolio of 3737 career applications, primarily focused on the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 73.05 percent across its historical filings. This success rate is achieved with an average of 3.87 office actions per allowance, indicating the level of examiner interaction required to secure patent rights.

Currently, the firm has 10 pending office actions to address within this technology sector. The 3737 career applications demonstrate the firm's history of engagement with the patent office. Practitioners can use the 3.87 average office actions per allowance to set expectations for prosecution timelines and resource allocation when working with this firm. The 73.05 percent resolved allowance rate provides a metric of historical performance. These data points offer a view of the firm's activity in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=3737 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

73.0%
Allowance Rate
n=3737
+0.51σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=3737
3.9
OAs to Allowance
n=2082
+0.19σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=2082
1328 days
Time to Allowance
n=2082
+6.1pp
Interview Lift
n=3737
26.7%
RCE Rate
n=3737
2.4%
Appeal Rate
n=3737

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

77.4%
§101 Overcome
n=297
74.3%
§102 Overcome
n=778
75.0%
§103 Overcome
n=1205
77.4%
§112 Overcome
n=990

Specialization & Scale

A61K, A61P, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
18%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=3737
5
Practitioners
n=3737
747.4
Apps / Practitioner
n=3737

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

11
Hard (92%)
1
Medium (8%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only8 (67%)
§101 + other3 (25%)
§103 only1 (8%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
11
Mechanical / Eng
92% of docket
1
Business / Other
8% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SHIU, HO T 1 72.0% -3.5%
BAIRD, EDWARD J 1 49.2% +67.3%
ALLADIN, AMBREEN A 1 24.6% +24.4%
MERCHANT, SHAHID R 1 28.3% +24.8%
RANKINS, WILLIAM E 1 57.6% +8.1%
KAZIMI, HANI M 1 48.5% +19.4%
NGUYEN, NGA B 1 53.0% +25.2%
KWONG, CHO YIU 1 32.3% +4.3%
FU, HAO 1 50.1% +24.8%
BARR, MARY EVANGELINE 1 35.8% +32.6%

Hard Cases (11)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
10643885 Systems and methods for documenting home care services REYES, REGINALD R 4d overdue
13854516 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR POOL RISK ASSESSMENT KAZIMI, HANI M 3d overdue
13854350 SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR PROVIDING MULTIPLE INCOME START DATES FOR ANNUITIES RANKINS, WILLIAM E 7d
11866815 System and Method For Providing A Deferred Premium Annuity KWONG, CHO YIU 9d
11556396 S/M FOR PROVIDING AN OPTION TO CONVERT A PORTFOLIO OF ASSETS INTO A GUARANTEED INCOME FLOW AT A FUTURE DATE FU, HAO 56d
14821967 Systems and Methods for Providing a Benefit Product with Periodic Guaranteed Income BAIRD, EDWARD J —
14450580 System and Method for Imbedding a Defined Benefit in a Defined Contribution Plan ALLADIN, AMBREEN A —
14057381 Systems and Methods for Performing Workflow MERCHANT, SHAHID R —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
13854516 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR POOL RISK ASSESSMENT KAZIMI, HANI M 3d overdue
11556396 S/M FOR PROVIDING AN OPTION TO CONVERT A PORTFOLIO OF ASSETS INTO A GUARANTEED INCOME FLOW AT A FUTURE DATE FU, HAO 56d
14821967 Systems and Methods for Providing a Benefit Product with Periodic Guaranteed Income BAIRD, EDWARD J —
14450580 System and Method for Imbedding a Defined Benefit in a Defined Contribution Plan ALLADIN, AMBREEN A —
14057381 Systems and Methods for Performing Workflow MERCHANT, SHAHID R —
12144118 Method and system for portable retirement investment NGUYEN, NGA B —
10777634 Method and system for electronically routing and processing information BARR, MARY EVANGELINE —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36912
36842
36921
36001
36941
36251
36931
36951
36821

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19199764 DATA-DRIVEN, RISK AND ACTIVITY-BASED DYNAMIC AUDIT APPLICATION AND METHOD American Institute Of Certified Public Accountants SHIU, HO T §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 06, 2025
14821967 Systems and Methods for Providing a Benefit Product with Periodic Guaranteed Income Genworth Holdings, Inc. BAIRD, EDWARD J 3692 §101Other Final Rejection — Pending Aug 10, 2015
14450580 System and Method for Imbedding a Defined Benefit in a Defined Contribution Plan Genworth Holdings, Inc. ALLADIN, AMBREEN A 3691 §101Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 04, 2014
14057381 Systems and Methods for Performing Workflow Genworth Holdings, Inc. MERCHANT, SHAHID R 3600 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 18, 2013
13854350 SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR PROVIDING MULTIPLE INCOME START DATES FOR ANNUITIES Genworth Holdings, Inc. RANKINS, WILLIAM E 3694 §101§112 Non-Final OA 7d Pending Apr 01, 2013
13854516 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR POOL RISK ASSESSMENT Genworth Holdings, Inc. KAZIMI, HANI M 3691 §101 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Apr 01, 2013
12144118 Method and system for portable retirement investment GE Financial Assurance Holdings, Inc. NGUYEN, NGA B 3625 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 23, 2008
11866815 System and Method For Providing A Deferred Premium Annuity Genworth Financial, Inc. KWONG, CHO YIU 3693 §101§112 Non-Final OA 9d Pending Oct 03, 2007
11556396 S/M FOR PROVIDING AN OPTION TO CONVERT A PORTFOLIO OF ASSETS INTO A GUARANTEED INCOME FLOW AT A FUTURE DATE Genworth Financial, Inc. FU, HAO 3695 §101 Final Rejection 56d Pending Nov 03, 2006
10777634 Method and system for electronically routing and processing information Genworth Financial Inc. BARR, MARY EVANGELINE 3682 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 13, 2004
10643885 Systems and methods for documenting home care services GE Financial Assurance Holdings, Inc. REYES, REGINALD R 3684 §101§112 Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Aug 20, 2003
10028284 System and method for pricing of a financial product or service using a waterfall tool GE Financial Holdings Assurance KHATTAR, RAJESH 3684 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 28, 2001

Managing Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month