Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Kdw Firm Pllc

8 pending office actions • 1 client • 8 examiners • 8 art units • 7 of 8 (88%) have an AI response strategy ready • 25 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (62%)
3
Medium (38%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (38%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (62%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
7
Information Tech
88% of docket
1
Communications
12% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NGUYEN, MINH TRANG T 1 90.2% +5.5%
DIVITO, WALTER J 1 83.3% +10.8%
HAJIABBASI, AMIR MAHDI 1 87.5% +18.8%
LATORRE, IVAN O 1 85.3% +9.9%
SANDHU, NEVENA ZECEVIC 1 74.1% +6.3%
PATEL, KAUSHIKKUMAR M 1 81.7% +0.1%
CHOI, HAESHIL JESSICA 1 73.3% -8.3%
TORRES, MARCOS L 1 67.2% +11.1%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18090682 TRANSPARENT SANITIZATION FOR SYNCHRONIZATION MESSAGES IN TIME SENSITIVE NETWORKING HAJIABBASI, AMIR MAHDI 114d overdue
18574651 USING AI-BASED MODELS FOR NETWORK ENERGY SAVINGS NGUYEN, MINH TRANG T 7d

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18088346 METHODS AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR ASSOCIATION WITH A NON-COLLOCATED MULTI-LINK DEVICE LATORRE, IVAN O 31d overdue
18076120 REMOVING CORE MEMORY ACCESSES IN HASH TABLE LOOKUPS USING AN ACCELERATOR DEVICE PATEL, KAUSHIKKUMAR M 10d overdue
17561506 METHODS AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR CONTROL CHANNEL OPERATION TORRES, MARCOS L 54d
18130695 DYNAMIC RESOURCE RECONFIGURATION BASED ON WORKLOAD SEMANTICS AND BEHAVIOR DIVITO, WALTER J 56d
18088291 METHODS AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR TRANSITION BETWEEN ACCESS POINTS OF A NON-COLLOCATED MULTI-LINK DEVICE SANDHU, NEVENA ZECEVIC 70d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18090682 TRANSPARENT SANITIZATION FOR SYNCHRONIZATION MESSAGES IN TIME SENSITIVE NETWORKING HAJIABBASI, AMIR MAHDI 114d overdue
17561506 METHODS AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR CONTROL CHANNEL OPERATION TORRES, MARCOS L 54d
18130695 DYNAMIC RESOURCE RECONFIGURATION BASED ON WORKLOAD SEMANTICS AND BEHAVIOR DIVITO, WALTER J 56d

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Intel 8

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
24771
24651
24071
24091
24741
21381
24791
26471

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18574651 USING AI-BASED MODELS FOR NETWORK ENERGY SAVINGS Intel Corporation NGUYEN, MINH TRANG T 2477 §103 Non-Final OA 7d AI Ready Dec 27, 2023
18130695 DYNAMIC RESOURCE RECONFIGURATION BASED ON WORKLOAD SEMANTICS AND BEHAVIOR Intel Corporation DIVITO, WALTER J 2465 §102§103 Non-Final OA 56d Pending Apr 04, 2023
18090682 TRANSPARENT SANITIZATION FOR SYNCHRONIZATION MESSAGES IN TIME SENSITIVE NETWORKING Intel Corporation HAJIABBASI, AMIR MAHDI 2407 §103 Final Rejection 114d overdue AI Ready Dec 29, 2022
18088346 METHODS AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR ASSOCIATION WITH A NON-COLLOCATED MULTI-LINK DEVICE Intel Corporation LATORRE, IVAN O 2409 §103§112 Non-Final OA 31d overdue AI Ready Dec 23, 2022
18088291 METHODS AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR TRANSITION BETWEEN ACCESS POINTS OF A NON-COLLOCATED MULTI-LINK DEVICE Intel Corporation SANDHU, NEVENA ZECEVIC 2474 §103§112 Non-Final OA 70d AI Ready Dec 23, 2022
18076120 REMOVING CORE MEMORY ACCESSES IN HASH TABLE LOOKUPS USING AN ACCELERATOR DEVICE Intel Corporation PATEL, KAUSHIKKUMAR M 2138 §102§112 Non-Final OA 10d overdue AI Ready Dec 06, 2022
17561138 Methods and Arrangements for Directional Channel Access Intel Corporation CHOI, HAESHIL JESSICA 2479 §103 Non-Final OA 17d overdue AI Ready Dec 23, 2021
17561506 METHODS AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR CONTROL CHANNEL OPERATION Intel Corporation TORRES, MARCOS L 2647 §103§112 Non-Final OA 54d AI Ready Dec 23, 2021

Managing Kdw Firm Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month