Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Law Office Of Kevin Jackson

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

6 pending office actions • 2 clients • 6 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 15 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Law Office of Kevin Jackson has 6 pending office actions in Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics and 359 career applications. The record combines a defined current examination workload with a historical application base in the same technical area.

The resolved allowance rate is 98.44%, and the average is 3.35 office actions per allowance. The first measure concerns resolved allowance outcomes, while the second describes examination activity associated with allowed matters. Practitioners can use this historical context when organizing responses, but should not treat it as a substitute for application-specific analysis of claim scope and examiner issues.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=359 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

98.4%
Allowance Rate
n=359
+0.58σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=359
3.4
OAs to Allowance
n=316
-0.09σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=316
1018 days
Time to Allowance
n=316
-4.6pp
Interview Lift
n=359
21.8%
RCE Rate
n=359
6.3%
Appeal Rate
n=359

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=2 (min 20)
94.4%
§102 Overcome
n=143
91.2%
§103 Overcome
n=160
92.2%
§112 Overcome
n=77

Specialization & Scale

H10W, H01L, H10P
Top CPC Subclasses
84%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=359
1
Practitioners
n=359
359.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=359

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (33%)
4
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (67%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
5
Semiconductors
83% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ZARNEKE, DAVID A 1 71.1% +11.1%
SOWARD, IDA M 1 93.4% +5.4%
FLECK, LINDA JOAN 1 78.0% +12.0%
STARK, JARRETT J 1 70.4% +11.0%
BEARDSLEY, JONAS TYLER 1 61.0% +28.7%
ANGUIANO, MICHAEL 1 53.3% +16.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18785462 SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES SOWARD, IDA M —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17958965 ELECTRONIC DEVICES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC DEVICES ANGUIANO, MICHAEL 49d
18411911 ELECTRONIC DEVICES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC DEVICES BEARDSLEY, JONAS TYLER —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17958965 ELECTRONIC DEVICES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC DEVICES ANGUIANO, MICHAEL 49d
18800784 SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE HAVING ROUTABLE ENCAPSULATED CONDUCTIVE SUBSTRATE AND METHOD ZARNEKE, DAVID A —
18669032 ELECTRONIC DEVICES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC DEVICES FLECK, LINDA JOAN —
18632196 METHOD OF FORMING A MOLDED SUBSTRATE ELECTRONIC PACKAGE AND STRUCTURE STARK, JARRETT J —
18411911 ELECTRONIC DEVICES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC DEVICES BEARDSLEY, JONAS TYLER —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28911
28121
28981
28111
28991

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18800784 SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE HAVING ROUTABLE ENCAPSULATED CONDUCTIVE SUBSTRATE AND METHOD Amkor Technology Singapore Holding Pte. Ltd. ZARNEKE, DAVID A 2891 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 12, 2024
18785462 SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES Amkor Technology Singapore Holding Pte. Ltd. SOWARD, IDA M §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 26, 2024
18669032 ELECTRONIC DEVICES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC DEVICES Amkor Technology Singapore Holding Pte. Ltd. FLECK, LINDA JOAN 2812 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 20, 2024
18632196 METHOD OF FORMING A MOLDED SUBSTRATE ELECTRONIC PACKAGE AND STRUCTURE Amkor Technology Singapore Holding Pte. Ltd. STARK, JARRETT J 2898 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 10, 2024
18411911 ELECTRONIC DEVICES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC DEVICES Amkor Technology Singapore Holding Pte. Ltd. BEARDSLEY, JONAS TYLER 2811 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 12, 2024
17958965 ELECTRONIC DEVICES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC DEVICES Amkor Technology Singapore Holding Pte. Ltd. ANGUIANO, MICHAEL 2899 §103§112 Final Rejection 49d Pending Oct 03, 2022

Managing Law Office Of Kevin Jackson's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Law Office Of Kevin Jackson's patent allowance rate?

98.4% of resolved applications prosecuted by Law Office Of Kevin Jackson were allowed, across 359 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Law Office Of Kevin Jackson average before allowance?

3.35 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Law Office Of Kevin Jackson have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 2 clients, before 6 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month