Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Maccord Mason Pllc

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

11 pending office actions • 7 clients • 10 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

MACCORD MASON PLLC specializes in the Chemistry & Materials technology area, with a total of 1761 career applications. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 85.52 percent. This 85.52 percent allowance rate demonstrates a consistent ability to navigate the patent office's requirements and secure grants for chemical and materials science clients.

The firm averages 2.51 office actions per allowance. This metric of 2.51 office actions indicates an efficient prosecution cycle, often requiring several rounds of examiner interaction to reach an allowance. Currently, the firm is managing 9 pending office actions. These 9 pending office actions represent the firm's immediate workload within its broader portfolio of 1761 career applications. For practitioners, the combination of an 85.52 percent allowance rate and a 2.51 average for office actions suggests a firm that balances success with a streamlined approach.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1761 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

85.5%
Allowance Rate
n=1761
+0.50σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1761
2.5
OAs to Allowance
n=1128
-0.23σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1128
1021 days
Time to Allowance
n=1128
+7.2pp
Interview Lift
n=1761
16.4%
RCE Rate
n=1761
1.7%
Appeal Rate
n=1761

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

65.7%
§101 Overcome
n=35
81.8%
§102 Overcome
n=248
83.7%
§103 Overcome
n=424
84.4%
§112 Overcome
n=379

Specialization & Scale

Y10T, G06Q, G01N
Top CPC Subclasses
11%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1761
3
Practitioners
n=1761
587.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1761

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

9
Hard (82%)
2
Medium (18%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (9%)
§102 only1 (9%)
Multi-statute (no §101)9 (82%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
55% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
9% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
27% of docket
1
Business / Other
9% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
EOM, ROBERT J 2 57.5% +34.7%
GARFT, CHRISTOPHER 1 59.0% +23.3%
BRYANT, REBECCA CAROLE 1 64.8% +32.5%
BRADFORD, JONATHAN 1 76.1% +21.3%
QUINN, DANIEL MICHAEL 1 70.4% +34.7%
THAKUR, VIREN A 1 13.4% +26.6%
ROSEN, ERIC J 1 41.3% +22.8%
KHAN, AMINA S 1 47.5% +43.0%
JARRETT, LORE RAMILLANO 1 68.5% +25.1%
LYLE, SOPHIA YUAN 1 57.2% +56.7%

Hard Cases (9)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
14437279 DEFINITIVE DEVELOPMENT DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS EOM, ROBERT J 74d overdue
18948028 HANGER GARFT, CHRISTOPHER 6d
18271069 DELIVERY APPARATUS TO DELIVER A HIDDEN ITEM INSIDE A FOOD THAKUR, VIREN A 30d
18834744 TEST DEVICE, ASSEMBLY, AND METHOD BRYANT, REBECCA CAROLE 48d
16652175 SINGLE UNIT ASSAY DEVICE, METHOD, AND ASSEMBLY LYLE, SOPHIA YUAN 63d
18730868 DETECTION SYSTEM, ASSEMBLY, AND METHOD BRADFORD, JONATHAN —
18754336 TAPE MEASURE ASSEMBLY QUINN, DANIEL MICHAEL —
18008057 CLEANING KIT HAVING A SOLUTE ROSEN, ERIC J —

Interview Candidates (11)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17796503 APPLICATION OF FRAGRANCE TO FABRIC SUBSTRATES USING FOAM KHAN, AMINA S 93d overdue
14437279 DEFINITIVE DEVELOPMENT DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS EOM, ROBERT J 74d overdue
18948028 HANGER GARFT, CHRISTOPHER 6d
18271069 DELIVERY APPARATUS TO DELIVER A HIDDEN ITEM INSIDE A FOOD THAKUR, VIREN A 30d
18834744 TEST DEVICE, ASSEMBLY, AND METHOD BRYANT, REBECCA CAROLE 48d
16652175 SINGLE UNIT ASSAY DEVICE, METHOD, AND ASSEMBLY LYLE, SOPHIA YUAN 63d
18730868 DETECTION SYSTEM, ASSEMBLY, AND METHOD BRADFORD, JONATHAN —
18754336 TAPE MEASURE ASSEMBLY QUINN, DANIEL MICHAEL —

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17973
36321
28771
37631
17921
37001
17611
17961

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18948028 HANGER Liberty Garden Products, Inc. GARFT, CHRISTOPHER 3632 §102§112 Final Rejection 6d Pending Nov 14, 2024
18834744 TEST DEVICE, ASSEMBLY, AND METHOD Charm Sciences, Inc. BRYANT, REBECCA CAROLE 2877 §103§112 Non-Final OA 48d Pending Jul 31, 2024
18730868 DETECTION SYSTEM, ASSEMBLY, AND METHOD Charm Sciences, Inc. BRADFORD, JONATHAN 3763 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 22, 2024
18754336 TAPE MEASURE ASSEMBLY Diversified Innovations, LLC QUINN, DANIEL MICHAEL §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 26, 2024
18271069 DELIVERY APPARATUS TO DELIVER A HIDDEN ITEM INSIDE A FOOD Charm Concepts, LLC THAKUR, VIREN A 1792 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 30d Pending Jul 06, 2023
18008057 CLEANING KIT HAVING A SOLUTE Berkshire Holding Corporation ROSEN, ERIC J 3700 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 02, 2022
17796503 APPLICATION OF FRAGRANCE TO FABRIC SUBSTRATES USING FOAM Lisa Lindberg KHAN, AMINA S 1761 §103 Final Rejection 93d overdue Pending Jul 29, 2022
17639601 TEST DEVICE, ASSEMBLY, AND METHOD Charm Sciences Inc. JARRETT, LORE RAMILLANO 1797 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 02, 2022
16652175 SINGLE UNIT ASSAY DEVICE, METHOD, AND ASSEMBLY Charm Sciences, Inc. LYLE, SOPHIA YUAN 1796 §103§112 Non-Final OA 63d Pending Mar 30, 2020
16825357 ASSAY ANALYSIS Charm Sciences, Inc. EOM, ROBERT J 1797 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 20, 2020
14437279 DEFINITIVE DEVELOPMENT DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS Charm Sciences, Inc. EOM, ROBERT J 1797 §102§103 Final Rejection 74d overdue Pending Apr 21, 2015

Managing Maccord Mason Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month