Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Maine Cernota & Curran

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

17 pending office actions • 12 clients • 17 examiners • 12 art units • 0 of 17 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 63 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Maine Cernota & Curran operates in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area, with 2308 career applications. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 85.51 percent. This 85.51 percent allowance rate demonstrates a steady performance in securing patent rights for its biotech and pharmaceutical clients across thousands of filings.

On average, the firm receives 2.93 office actions per allowance. This metric of 2.93 office actions indicates a standard prosecution cycle, typically requiring several interactions with examiners to reach an allowance. Currently, the firm has 13 pending office actions. These 13 pending office actions represent the firm's active workload relative to its 2308 career applications. The combination of an 85.51 percent allowance rate and a 2.93 average for office actions suggests that Maine Cernota & Curran effectively manages its clients' portfolios with a focus on consistent outcomes.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=2308 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

85.5%
Allowance Rate
n=2308
+0.56σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=2308
2.9
OAs to Allowance
n=1465
-0.26σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1465
935 days
Time to Allowance
n=1465
+7.7pp
Interview Lift
n=2308
21.4%
RCE Rate
n=2308
2.0%
Appeal Rate
n=2308

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

91.8%
§101 Overcome
n=134
81.9%
§102 Overcome
n=546
82.8%
§103 Overcome
n=906
84.2%
§112 Overcome
n=709

Specialization & Scale

G06F, Y10T, B29C
Top CPC Subclasses
8%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=2308
2
Practitioners
n=2308
1154.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=2308

Portfolio Summary

17
Total Pending OAs
10
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (47%)
7
Medium (41%)
2
Easy (12%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (12%)
§103 only5 (29%)
§102 only1 (6%)
§112 only1 (6%)
Double-patenting only1 (6%)
Double-patenting + other1 (6%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (35%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
24% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
3
Semiconductors
18% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
29% of docket
5
Business / Other
29% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

170 h
Manual time on pending OAs
34 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
59 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BADAWI, MEDHAT 1 81.5% +12.6%
SINGH, ESVINDER 1 77.4% +22.7%
MORENO HERNANDEZ, JERZI H 1 73.1% +15.4%
ANTONUCCI, ANNE MARIE 1 87.4% +10.0%
AMARA, MOHAMED K 1 75.8% +29.8%
PHAN, HANH 1 88.7% +6.6%
BUSHEY, CHARLES S 1 75.5% +22.2%
SAVANI, AVINASH A 1 74.6% +20.8%
BARNETT, JOEL 1 80.4% +11.3%
SIEFKE, SAMUEL P 1 63.1% +17.8%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18708773 SCANNING MIRROR FOR LASER POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM BARNETT, JOEL 43d overdue
19466609 CAPTURING SYSTEM AND CAPTURING METHOD BADAWI, MEDHAT —
18823113 MULTIPLE BEAM WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PHAN, HANH —

Hard Cases (8)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18023472 FINGER RECEPTACLE AND HOLDING DEVICE TOWA, RENE T 43d overdue
18558841 STABLE BIOACTIVE COMPOSITION CHEN, CATHERYNE 3d overdue
18556203 WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM MOURAD, RASEM 21d
18852873 LASER BASED GAS DETECTOR AMARA, MOHAMED K 41d
19141249 A TOOL ENGAGEMENT COUPLING SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED METHOD SINGH, ESVINDER —
19089955 INJECTION DEVICE, INJECTION MOLDING MACHINE HAVING THE SAME, AND INJECTION MOLDING METHOD MORENO HERNANDEZ, JERZI H —
18994736 DETERMINING UTILISATION OF RESOURCES IN A SYSTEM HAVING AUTONOMOUS CAPABILITY ANTONUCCI, ANNE MARIE —
18117807 CONTROLLED MOISTURE TRANSPORT PACKAGING FOR FRESH PRODUCE KESSLER JR, THOMAS JOSEPH —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18708773 SCANNING MIRROR FOR LASER POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM BARNETT, JOEL 43d overdue
18852873 LASER BASED GAS DETECTOR AMARA, MOHAMED K 41d
19466609 CAPTURING SYSTEM AND CAPTURING METHOD BADAWI, MEDHAT —
19141249 A TOOL ENGAGEMENT COUPLING SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED METHOD SINGH, ESVINDER —
19089955 INJECTION DEVICE, INJECTION MOLDING MACHINE HAVING THE SAME, AND INJECTION MOLDING METHOD MORENO HERNANDEZ, JERZI H —
18994736 DETERMINING UTILISATION OF RESOURCES IN A SYSTEM HAVING AUTONOMOUS CAPABILITY ANTONUCCI, ANNE MARIE —
18832578 AUTOMATIC OIL DISPENSER FOR MOUNTING ONTO AN OBJECTIVE IN AN INVERTED MICROSCOPE SYSTEM BUSHEY, CHARLES S —
18723257 DEVICE FOR THE DELIVERY OF A COMBUSTIBLE GASEOUS MIXTURE AND PROCEDURE SAVANI, AVINASH A —

Client Portfolio (12 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36421
36571
36661
28771
28491
37291
16551
28361
16511
17821

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19466609 CAPTURING SYSTEM AND CAPTURING METHOD Astroscale Japan Inc. BADAWI, MEDHAT 3642 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 02, 2026
19141249 A TOOL ENGAGEMENT COUPLING SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED METHOD BAE Systems PLC SINGH, ESVINDER 3657 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 19, 2025
19089955 INJECTION DEVICE, INJECTION MOLDING MACHINE HAVING THE SAME, AND INJECTION MOLDING METHOD Doshisha University MORENO HERNANDEZ, JERZI H §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 25, 2025
18994736 DETERMINING UTILISATION OF RESOURCES IN A SYSTEM HAVING AUTONOMOUS CAPABILITY BAE Systems PLC ANTONUCCI, ANNE MARIE 3666 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 15, 2025
18852873 LASER BASED GAS DETECTOR Wi-Charge Ltd. AMARA, MOHAMED K 2877 §103§112 Non-Final OA 41d Pending Sep 30, 2024
18823113 MULTIPLE BEAM WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM Wi-Charge Ltd. PHAN, HANH DP Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 03, 2024
18832578 AUTOMATIC OIL DISPENSER FOR MOUNTING ONTO AN OBJECTIVE IN AN INVERTED MICROSCOPE SYSTEM Panacea Diagnostics Ltd. BUSHEY, CHARLES S §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 24, 2024
18723257 DEVICE FOR THE DELIVERY OF A COMBUSTIBLE GASEOUS MIXTURE AND PROCEDURE Sit S.p.A. SAVANI, AVINASH A §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 21, 2024
18708773 SCANNING MIRROR FOR LASER POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM Wi-Charge Ltd. BARNETT, JOEL 2849 §103 Final Rejection 43d overdue Pending May 09, 2024
18697673 IMPROVEMENTS IN OR RELATING TO A DEVICE FOR IMAGING Panacea Diagnostics Ltd. SIEFKE, SAMUEL P §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 01, 2024
18609631 FLUXLESS GANG DIE BONDING ARRANGEMENT Sharpack Technology Pte. Ltd. CAZAN, LIVIUS RADU 3729 §112 Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Mar 19, 2024
18558841 STABLE BIOACTIVE COMPOSITION Lintbells Limited CHEN, CATHERYNE 1655 §102§103 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Nov 03, 2023
18556203 WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM Wi-Charge Ltd. MOURAD, RASEM 2836 §101§103§112Other Non-Final OA 21d Pending Oct 19, 2023
18269663 AVIAN FOOD ADDITIVE Tharos Limited CURRENS, GRANT CARSON 1651 §103DP Final Rejection — Pending Jun 26, 2023
18117807 CONTROLLED MOISTURE TRANSPORT PACKAGING FOR FRESH PRODUCE Windham Packaging, LLC KESSLER JR, THOMAS JOSEPH 1782 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 06, 2023
18023472 FINGER RECEPTACLE AND HOLDING DEVICE Mowgli Innovations Ltd. TOWA, RENE T 3791 §102§103 Final Rejection 43d overdue Pending Feb 27, 2023
17767610 METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION OF TRIS-(3-HYDROXYBUTYRATO)-GLYCERYL ESTER Dr. Schar S.p.A. KELLY-O'NEILL, YOLANDA LYNNETTE 1692 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 08, 2022

Managing Maine Cernota & Curran's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month