Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Mills Ip Law, Pllc

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

9 pending office actions • 9 clients • 9 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Mills IP Law, PLLC is a patent law firm specializing in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The firm has handled 421 career applications and maintains a high resolved allowance rate of 91.17 percent. Prosecution is efficient, with an average of 2.31 office actions per allowance.

Currently, the firm has 4 pending office actions. The 2.31 average office actions per allowance suggests a streamlined prosecution process, often reaching an allowance in fewer cycles than the industry average. This efficiency is documented across 421 career applications in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field.

A 91.17 percent allowance rate demonstrates a very high success rate for resolved applications. The 2.31 average office actions per allowance indicates that the firm effectively navigates examiner rejections. With 4 pending office actions, the firm continues to provide focused prosecution services in this technical area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=421 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

91.2%
Allowance Rate
n=421
+0.97σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=421
2.3
OAs to Allowance
n=258
-0.70σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=258
920 days
Time to Allowance
n=258
+12.3pp
Interview Lift
n=421
15.6%
RCE Rate
n=421
0.6%
Appeal Rate
n=421

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=6 (min 20)
86.6%
§102 Overcome
n=82
81.8%
§103 Overcome
n=165
79.0%
§112 Overcome
n=95

Specialization & Scale

A61M, G16H, A61B
Top CPC Subclasses
38%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=421
0
Practitioners
n=421
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=421 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
2
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (67%)
2
Medium (22%)
1
Easy (11%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (11%)
§103 only2 (22%)
§112 only1 (11%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (56%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
11% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
44% of docket
4
Business / Other
44% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
STEPHENS, JACQUELINE F 1 75.6% +14.8%
LEFF, STEVEN N 1 41.3% +7.9%
GREENE, CAROLYN LEE 1 65.3% +47.3%
GANAN-SINGH, CHRISTINA MERAIAH 1 66.7% +50.0%
SWANSON, LEAH JENNINGS 1 65.5% +38.3%
BAHENA, CHRISTIE L. 1 68.2% +23.5%
FLICK, JASON E 1 80.6% +13.4%
SANTOS, ROBERT G 1 73.0% +35.0%
PRICE, NATHAN R 1 53.4% +38.9%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18381535 EMERGENCY MEDICAL INTERVENTION DEVICE FLICK, JASON E 5d
18855853 CONTAINER WITH INTERNAL PORT STEPHENS, JACQUELINE F —
18815100 APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR MAKING BREAD LEFF, STEVEN N —
18733278 PORTABLE MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE AND METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF TARGET VIRUSES GREENE, CAROLYN LEE —
18652653 TEMPERATURE REGULATED FLUID THERAPY GANAN-SINGH, CHRISTINA MERAIAH —
18650596 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR DELIVERING A LYOPHILIZED MEDICAMENT SWANSON, LEAH JENNINGS —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18381535 EMERGENCY MEDICAL INTERVENTION DEVICE FLICK, JASON E 5d
17923115 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REMOVING BIOMATERIAL IMPLANTS PRICE, NATHAN R 6d
18855853 CONTAINER WITH INTERNAL PORT STEPHENS, JACQUELINE F —
18733278 PORTABLE MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE AND METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF TARGET VIRUSES GREENE, CAROLYN LEE —
18652653 TEMPERATURE REGULATED FLUID THERAPY GANAN-SINGH, CHRISTINA MERAIAH —
18650596 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR DELIVERING A LYOPHILIZED MEDICAMENT SWANSON, LEAH JENNINGS —
18630240 IMPLANTS AND METHODS FOR SHOULDER JOINT RECONSTRUCTION BAHENA, CHRISTIE L. —
18370308 THERAPEUTIC CUSHION SYSTEMS AND METHODS SANTOS, ROBERT G —

Client Portfolio (9 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37832
17921
37941
36731

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18855853 CONTAINER WITH INTERNAL PORT Instant Systems, Inc. STEPHENS, JACQUELINE F §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 10, 2024
18815100 APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR MAKING BREAD Iyukti LLC LEFF, STEVEN N 1792 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 26, 2024
18733278 PORTABLE MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE AND METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF TARGET VIRUSES Visby Medical, Inc. GREENE, CAROLYN LEE §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 04, 2024
18652653 TEMPERATURE REGULATED FLUID THERAPY Neurointact, Inc. GANAN-SINGH, CHRISTINA MERAIAH 3794 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 01, 2024
18650596 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR DELIVERING A LYOPHILIZED MEDICAMENT Kaleo, Inc. SWANSON, LEAH JENNINGS §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 30, 2024
18630240 IMPLANTS AND METHODS FOR SHOULDER JOINT RECONSTRUCTION B/G Ortho Innovations, LLC BAHENA, CHRISTIE L. §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 09, 2024
18381535 EMERGENCY MEDICAL INTERVENTION DEVICE Corvictus, LLC FLICK, JASON E 3783 §101§102§103§112Other Non-Final OA 5d Pending Oct 18, 2023
18370308 THERAPEUTIC CUSHION SYSTEMS AND METHODS Amenity Health, Inc. SANTOS, ROBERT G 3673 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 19, 2023
17923115 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REMOVING BIOMATERIAL IMPLANTS Contraline, Inc. PRICE, NATHAN R 3783 §112 Final Rejection 6d Pending Nov 03, 2022

Managing Mills Ip Law, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month