Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Rauschenbach Patent Law Group, Pllc

6 pending office actions • 5 clients • 6 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Quality Metrics (n=437 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

93.9%
Allowance Rate
n=437
+0.72σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=437
2.7
OAs to Allowance
n=231
-0.38σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=231
1100 days
Time to Allowance
n=231
-3.9pp
Interview Lift
n=437
22.0%
RCE Rate
n=437
0.5%
Appeal Rate
n=437

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

§101 Overcome
n=8 (min 20)
91.6%
§102 Overcome
n=71
88.5%
§103 Overcome
n=156
85.9%
§112 Overcome
n=92

Specialization & Scale

H01J, G02B, H04B
Top CPC Subclasses
23%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=437
0
Practitioners
n=437
Apps / Practitioner
n=437 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (33%)
§112 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
33% of docket
1
Information Tech
17% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
17% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
17% of docket
1
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GYLLSTROM, BRYON T 1 67.9% +8.2%
MALIKASIM, JONATHAN L 1 80.8% -0.8%
MAK, RODRICK 1 76.0% +26.3%
BOWMAN, ANDREW J 1 65.7% +13.1%
BENNETT, CHARLEE 1 58.2% +35.7%
NOEL, JEMPSON 1 66.0% +32.0%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17687652 LiDAR System with Active Fault Monitoring NOEL, JEMPSON 43d overdue
19224646 Deglaring Films for Illumination Systems GYLLSTROM, BRYON T 69d
18619069 Extrinsic LiDAR Calibration MALIKASIM, JONATHAN L

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17717679 Rotating Disk Reactor with Split Substrate Carrier BENNETT, CHARLEE 77d overdue
18328726 Multiple Chamber System for Plasma Chemical Vapor Deposition of Diamond and Related Materials BOWMAN, ANDREW J 70d overdue
17687652 LiDAR System with Active Fault Monitoring NOEL, JEMPSON 43d overdue
18333298 System and Method for Determining Wireless Service Quality using Inference MAK, RODRICK

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28751
24161
17171
17181
36451

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19224646 Deglaring Films for Illumination Systems Brightview Technologies, Inc. GYLLSTROM, BRYON T 2875 §102§103 Non-Final OA 69d Pending May 30, 2025
18619069 Extrinsic LiDAR Calibration Opsys Tech Ltd. MALIKASIM, JONATHAN L §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Mar 27, 2024
18333298 System and Method for Determining Wireless Service Quality using Inference 7Signal, Inc. MAK, RODRICK 2416 §103 Final Rejection Pending Jun 12, 2023
18328726 Multiple Chamber System for Plasma Chemical Vapor Deposition of Diamond and Related Materials Plasmability, Llc. BOWMAN, ANDREW J 1717 §112 Non-Final OA 70d overdue Pending Jun 03, 2023
17717679 Rotating Disk Reactor with Split Substrate Carrier VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC. BENNETT, CHARLEE 1718 §103 Final Rejection 77d overdue Pending Apr 11, 2022
17687652 LiDAR System with Active Fault Monitoring Opsys Tech Ltd. NOEL, JEMPSON 3645 §103§112 Non-Final OA 43d overdue Pending Mar 06, 2022

Managing Rauschenbach Patent Law Group, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month