Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Saunders Mckeon Pllc

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

9 pending office actions • 5 clients • 9 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Saunders McKeon PLLC has 584 career applications and 10 pending office actions in Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics. The record shows an established application history alongside a limited current action workload in a field where claim scope can depend on circuit relationships, device structures, and optical or semiconductor process details.

The resolved allowance rate is 79.1%, with an average of 3.12 office actions per allowance. The allowance figure describes resolved outcomes, while the action average addresses examination effort. Practitioners can use those measures to frame portfolio expectations, but the metrics do not identify the grounds or claim types driving individual results.

File-level review should therefore connect the historical indicators to the technical record. Particular attention may be warranted for distinctions over cited references, support for combined electrical and physical limitations, and amendments that address an examiner's position without unnecessarily narrowing useful protection.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=584 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

79.1%
Allowance Rate
n=584
+0.34σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=584
3.1
OAs to Allowance
n=265
-0.04σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=265
987 days
Time to Allowance
n=265
+13.8pp
Interview Lift
n=584
20.9%
RCE Rate
n=584
0.9%
Appeal Rate
n=584

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

79.2%
§101 Overcome
n=24
74.4%
§102 Overcome
n=156
75.6%
§103 Overcome
n=213
76.9%
§112 Overcome
n=169

Specialization & Scale

E21B, G11C, H10B
Top CPC Subclasses
24%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=584
2
Practitioners
n=584
292.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=584

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (78%)
2
Medium (22%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (22%)
§103 only1 (11%)
Double-patenting + other1 (11%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (56%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
22% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
5
Semiconductors
56% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
22% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HUSSAINI, ATTIYA SAYYADA 1 61.7% +19.5%
SIDDIQUE, MUSHFIQUE 1 89.6% +6.1%
SENGDARA, VONGSAVANH 1 72.3% +18.4%
WALL, VINCENT 1 62.6% +24.4%
MELLOTT, JAMES M 1 51.1% +44.1%
OTT, PATRICK S 1 68.0% +23.7%
SQUIRES, BRETT STEPHEN 1 52.4% +42.2%
NETTLES, CORALIE ANN 1 60.5% +31.7%
KASPER, BYRON XAVIER 1 71.0% +17.4%

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17757306 HANDHELD DEVICE FOR TRAINING AT LEAST ONE MOVEMENT AND AT LEAST ONE ACTIVITY OF A MACHINE, SYSTEM AND METHOD KASPER, BYRON XAVIER 22d
18541027 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR SPUTTERING AT LEAST TWO ELEMENTS OTT, PATRICK S 33d
18486180 MEMORY CELL ARRANGEMENT AND METHODS SQUIRES, BRETT STEPHEN 33d
18830663 MEMORY CELL ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD OF READING A CAPACITIVE MEMORY CELL SIDDIQUE, MUSHFIQUE —
18840946 MEMRISTIVE STRUCTURE, MEMRISTIVE ARRAY, AND METHODS THEREOF SENGDARA, VONGSAVANH —
18777621 MEMORY CELL, CAPACITIVE MEMORY STRUCTURE, AND METHODS THEREOF WALL, VINCENT —
18735203 VACUUM COATING APPARATUS, CONTROL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR INFLUENCING A RATE AT WHICH A COATING MATERIAL IS EMITTED MELLOTT, JAMES M —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17757306 HANDHELD DEVICE FOR TRAINING AT LEAST ONE MOVEMENT AND AT LEAST ONE ACTIVITY OF A MACHINE, SYSTEM AND METHOD KASPER, BYRON XAVIER 22d
18541027 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR SPUTTERING AT LEAST TWO ELEMENTS OTT, PATRICK S 33d
18486180 MEMORY CELL ARRANGEMENT AND METHODS SQUIRES, BRETT STEPHEN 33d
19230877 Apparatus For Detecting Motion HUSSAINI, ATTIYA SAYYADA —
18840946 MEMRISTIVE STRUCTURE, MEMRISTIVE ARRAY, AND METHODS THEREOF SENGDARA, VONGSAVANH —
18777621 MEMORY CELL, CAPACITIVE MEMORY STRUCTURE, AND METHODS THEREOF WALL, VINCENT —
18735203 VACUUM COATING APPARATUS, CONTROL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR INFLUENCING A RATE AT WHICH A COATING MATERIAL IS EMITTED MELLOTT, JAMES M —
17814745 MEMORY CELL AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING A MEMORY CAPACITOR NETTLES, CORALIE ANN —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28932
37921
28251
28981
17591
17941
28991
36571

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19230877 Apparatus For Detecting Motion Actegy Limited HUSSAINI, ATTIYA SAYYADA 3792 §102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 06, 2025
18830663 MEMORY CELL ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD OF READING A CAPACITIVE MEMORY CELL Ferroelectric Memory GmbH SIDDIQUE, MUSHFIQUE 2825 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 11, 2024
18840946 MEMRISTIVE STRUCTURE, MEMRISTIVE ARRAY, AND METHODS THEREOF Techifab GmbH SENGDARA, VONGSAVANH 2893 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 23, 2024
18777621 MEMORY CELL, CAPACITIVE MEMORY STRUCTURE, AND METHODS THEREOF Ferroelectric Memory GmbH WALL, VINCENT 2898 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 19, 2024
18735203 VACUUM COATING APPARATUS, CONTROL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR INFLUENCING A RATE AT WHICH A COATING MATERIAL IS EMITTED Von Ardenne Asset GmbH & Co. Kg MELLOTT, JAMES M 1759 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 06, 2024
18541027 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR SPUTTERING AT LEAST TWO ELEMENTS Techifab GmbH OTT, PATRICK S 1794 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 33d Pending Dec 15, 2023
18486180 MEMORY CELL ARRANGEMENT AND METHODS Ferroelectric Memory GmbH SQUIRES, BRETT STEPHEN 2899 §103§112 Final Rejection 33d Pending Oct 13, 2023
17814745 MEMORY CELL AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING A MEMORY CAPACITOR Ferroelectric Memory GmbH NETTLES, CORALIE ANN 2893 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 25, 2022
17757306 HANDHELD DEVICE FOR TRAINING AT LEAST ONE MOVEMENT AND AT LEAST ONE ACTIVITY OF A MACHINE, SYSTEM AND METHOD Wandelbots GmbH KASPER, BYRON XAVIER 3657 §103§112 Final Rejection 22d Pending Jun 14, 2022

Managing Saunders Mckeon Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Saunders Mckeon Pllc's patent allowance rate?

79.1% of resolved applications prosecuted by Saunders Mckeon Pllc were allowed, across 584 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Saunders Mckeon Pllc average before allowance?

3.12 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Saunders Mckeon Pllc have?

9 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 5 clients, before 9 examiners in 8 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month