Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Skydio, Inc. AT Young Basile

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

17 pending office actions • 1 client • 15 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 17 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 33 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Skydio, Inc. at Young Basile has an extensive career history of 13050 career applications, with a primary focus on the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The firm has reached a resolved allowance rate pct of 88.68. There are 11 pending office actions currently active. The 13050 career applications demonstrate the expertise in mechanical and e-commerce patent law.

The average office actions per allowance for this firm is 2.82. This figure suggests the prosecution process for reaching an allowance in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. The 88.68 resolved allowance rate pct indicates a level of success across the firm's 13050 career applications. With 11 pending office actions, the firm is actively managing its current workload. These metrics together illustrate the firm's presence and its procedural efficiency in its primary technical domains.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=13050 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.7%
Allowance Rate
n=13050
+0.50σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=13050
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=8859
-0.41σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=8859
878 days
Time to Allowance
n=8859
+6.1pp
Interview Lift
n=13050
20.5%
RCE Rate
n=13050
1.6%
Appeal Rate
n=13050

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

73.5%
§101 Overcome
n=849
80.3%
§102 Overcome
n=3908
80.6%
§103 Overcome
n=5965
82.9%
§112 Overcome
n=3617

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04N, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
13%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=13050
12
Practitioners
n=13050
1087.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=13050

Portfolio Summary

17
Total Pending OAs
13
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (47%)
7
Medium (41%)
2
Easy (12%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (6%)
§101 + other2 (12%)
§103 only7 (41%)
Double-patenting only2 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (29%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
6% of docket
10
Mechanical / Eng
59% of docket
6
Business / Other
35% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

170 h
Manual time on pending OAs
34 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
59 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN 2 57.7% +38.5%
SHAFI, MUHAMMAD 2 88.9% +16.8%
BEAN, JARED C 1 63.0% +42.4%
LEWANDROSKI, SARA J 1 81.0% +9.0%
GORDON, MATHEW FRANKLIN 1 72.5% +12.1%
BRADY III, PATRICK MICHAEL 1 54.1% +39.1%
BENEDIK, JUSTIN M 1 86.0% +10.5%
ROBERSON, JASON R 1 73.8% +22.4%
KC, SAGAR 1 86.5% +5.6%
CHEN, WENREN 1 15.2% +28.7%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19296176 Systems And Methods For Adjusting Flight Control Of An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle LEWANDROSKI, SARA J —
19090845 METHODS OF USING BASE STATIONS CONFIGURED TO RECEIVE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES BENEDIK, JUSTIN M —
18914894 Systems And Methods For Controlling An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle SHAFI, MUHAMMAD —

Hard Cases (9)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18999396 Variable Condition Motor Controller SHAFI, MUHAMMAD 10d overdue
18892296 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Semantic Understanding For Structure Inspection CHEN, WENREN 4d overdue
18318430 Autonomous Operation Of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles KUJUNDZIC, DINO 13d
19285220 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Path Determination ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN —
19285228 Distributed Map Generation for Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN —
19229145 Multipoint Cable Cam System And Method GORDON, MATHEW FRANKLIN —
19028421 MAP VIEW KC, SAGAR —
18393887 ADAPTIVE RATE GAIN CONTROLLER FITZHARRIS, KATHERINE MARIE —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18999396 Variable Condition Motor Controller SHAFI, MUHAMMAD 10d overdue
18892296 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Semantic Understanding For Structure Inspection CHEN, WENREN 4d overdue
19317701 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Controller BEAN, JARED C —
19285220 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Path Determination ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN —
19285228 Distributed Map Generation for Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN —
19229145 Multipoint Cable Cam System And Method GORDON, MATHEW FRANKLIN —
19228430 Security Key For Unmanned Aerial Vehicle BRADY III, PATRICK MICHAEL —
19090845 METHODS OF USING BASE STATIONS CONFIGURED TO RECEIVE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES BENEDIK, JUSTIN M —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Skydio, Inc. 17

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36692
36652
36421
36661
36611
36261
28961
36471
36581

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19317701 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Controller Skydio, Inc. BEAN, JARED C 3669 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 03, 2025
19296176 Systems And Methods For Adjusting Flight Control Of An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Skydio, Inc. LEWANDROSKI, SARA J DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 11, 2025
19285220 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Path Determination Skydio, Inc. ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 30, 2025
19285228 Distributed Map Generation for Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Skydio, Inc. ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 30, 2025
19229145 Multipoint Cable Cam System And Method Skydio, Inc. GORDON, MATHEW FRANKLIN §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 05, 2025
19228430 Security Key For Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Skydio, Inc. BRADY III, PATRICK MICHAEL 3665 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 04, 2025
19090845 METHODS OF USING BASE STATIONS CONFIGURED TO RECEIVE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES Skydio, Inc. BENEDIK, JUSTIN M 3642 DP Final Rejection — Pending Mar 26, 2025
19064197 Autonomous Aerial Navigation In Low-Light And No-Light Conditions Skydio, Inc. ROBERSON, JASON R 3669 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 26, 2025
19028421 MAP VIEW Skydio, Inc. KC, SAGAR §101§102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 17, 2025
18999396 Variable Condition Motor Controller Skydio, Inc. SHAFI, MUHAMMAD 3666 §103§112 Final Rejection 10d overdue Pending Dec 23, 2024
18914894 Systems And Methods For Controlling An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Skydio, Inc. SHAFI, MUHAMMAD 3661 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 14, 2024
18892296 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Semantic Understanding For Structure Inspection Skydio, Inc. CHEN, WENREN 3626 §103 Non-Final OA 4d overdue Pending Sep 20, 2024
18776086 Vision Systems For Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Skydio, Inc. NIRJHAR, NASIM NAZRUL 2896 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 17, 2024
18409644 Attachment Interface And Attachments For An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Skydio, Inc. HUTCHENS, CHRISTOPHER D. 3647 §103 Non-Final OA 19d Pending Jan 10, 2024
18393887 ADAPTIVE RATE GAIN CONTROLLER Skydio, Inc. FITZHARRIS, KATHERINE MARIE 3665 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 22, 2023
18318430 Autonomous Operation Of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Skydio, Inc. KUJUNDZIC, DINO 3658 §103§112 Non-Final OA 13d Pending May 16, 2023
18161024 Computer-Implemented Symbolic Differentiation Using Chain Rule Skydio, Inc. WAJE, CARLO C §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 27, 2023

Managing Skydio, Inc. AT Young Basile's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month