Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Smirman Ip Law, Pllc

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

6 pending office actions • 6 clients • 6 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

SMIRMAN IP LAW, PLLC manages 614 career applications in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The firm has a resolved allowance rate pct of 82.48. Prosecution involves an avg office actions per allowance of 3.0.

There are 5 pending office actions currently active. The 82.48 resolved allowance rate pct and 3.0 avg office actions per allowance are based on the firm's 614 career applications. These metrics provide a data-driven profile of the firm's performance in its primary technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=614 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

82.5%
Allowance Rate
n=614
+0.61σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=614
3.0
OAs to Allowance
n=452
-0.31σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=452
1043 days
Time to Allowance
n=452
+13.6pp
Interview Lift
n=614
19.2%
RCE Rate
n=614
0.2%
Appeal Rate
n=614

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

73.5%
§101 Overcome
n=98
81.6%
§102 Overcome
n=206
80.6%
§103 Overcome
n=336
81.6%
§112 Overcome
n=320

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, G06F, Y02E
Top CPC Subclasses
14%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=614
1
Practitioners
n=614
614.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=614

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (17%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (17%)
§112 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
17% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
17% of docket
2
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TROY, DANIEL J 1 57.1% +30.4%
GOLLAMUDI, NEERAJA 1 72.7% +39.9%
SCHMIDT, IZABELA MARIA 1 65.3% +42.5%
ESTES, JONATHAN WILLIAM 1 69.0% +6.5%
TURNER, BRIAN 1 83.4% +4.4%
LOVE, TREVOR M 1 43.0% +26.7%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18750711 MEDICAL FLUID CONNECTOR GOLLAMUDI, NEERAJA —
18578252 A SELF-EMULSIFYING DRUG DELIVERY FORMULATION WITH IMPROVED ORAL BIOAVAILABILITY OF LIPOPHILIC COMPOUND SCHMIDT, IZABELA MARIA —
18571612 An Improved Battery Grid and Electrode Thereof Vehicle ESTES, JONATHAN WILLIAM —
18268141 A METHOD FOR FABRICATING SEMICONDUCTOR ARTICLES AND SYSTEM THEREOF TURNER, BRIAN —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18865248 FALL-ARREST DEVICES TROY, DANIEL J —
18750711 MEDICAL FLUID CONNECTOR GOLLAMUDI, NEERAJA —
18578252 A SELF-EMULSIFYING DRUG DELIVERY FORMULATION WITH IMPROVED ORAL BIOAVAILABILITY OF LIPOPHILIC COMPOUND SCHMIDT, IZABELA MARIA —
17434422 SYNERGISTIC COMBINATION OF PHYTOACTIVES LOVE, TREVOR M —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36341
16211
28181
16111

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18865248 FALL-ARREST DEVICES International Safety Components Ltd. TROY, DANIEL J 3634 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 12, 2024
18750711 MEDICAL FLUID CONNECTOR Welford Manufacturing (M) Sdn Bhd GOLLAMUDI, NEERAJA §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 21, 2024
18578252 A SELF-EMULSIFYING DRUG DELIVERY FORMULATION WITH IMPROVED ORAL BIOAVAILABILITY OF LIPOPHILIC COMPOUND Avantsar Sdn Bhd SCHMIDT, IZABELA MARIA 1621 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 10, 2024
18571612 An Improved Battery Grid and Electrode Thereof Vehicle Atoa Scientific Technologies Pvt. Ltd. ESTES, JONATHAN WILLIAM §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 18, 2023
18268141 A METHOD FOR FABRICATING SEMICONDUCTOR ARTICLES AND SYSTEM THEREOF Inari Technology Sdn Bhd TURNER, BRIAN 2818 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 16, 2023
17434422 SYNERGISTIC COMBINATION OF PHYTOACTIVES Shankaranarayanan Jeyakodi LOVE, TREVOR M 1611 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 27, 2021

Managing Smirman Ip Law, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month