Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Spano Law Group

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

10 pending office actions • 2 clients • 10 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Spano Law Group (KLA) has 10 pending office actions in Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics and 219 career applications. The profile connects an active response docket with a broader record of applications in the same technology area.

The resolved allowance rate is 99.47%, and the average is 2.59 office actions per allowance. The allowance figure describes resolved outcomes, while the action average indicates the recorded examination effort associated with matters reaching allowance.

For practitioners, the combination provides a useful starting point for evaluating current capacity and historical prosecution results. It does not show why individual matters were allowed, how claims changed, or whether the pending actions involve the same clients or technologies represented in the application record.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=219 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

99.5%
Allowance Rate
n=219
+0.62σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=219
2.6
OAs to Allowance
n=186
-0.31σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=186
1048 days
Time to Allowance
n=186
+0.7pp
Interview Lift
n=219
32.6%
RCE Rate
n=219
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=219

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

86.8%
§101 Overcome
n=38
87.7%
§102 Overcome
n=65
88.8%
§103 Overcome
n=116
90.6%
§112 Overcome
n=53

Specialization & Scale

G01N, H10P, G03F
Top CPC Subclasses
51%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=219
0
Practitioners
n=219
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=219 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (60%)
4
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (20%)
§101 + other1 (10%)
§103 only3 (30%)
§102 only1 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (30%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
10% of docket
1
Communications
10% of docket
8
Semiconductors
80% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
THOMAS, COURTNEY D 1 89.0% +9.4%
TRAN, JUDY DAO 1 80.0% +16.5%
HANSEN, JONATHAN M 1 79.4% +11.5%
MENDOZA, ALEXANDRIA ARELLANO 1 68.8% +28.0%
QUIGLEY, KYLE ROBERT 1 53.3% +34.2%
LU, ZHIYU 1 48.8% +14.4%
FABIAN JR, ROBERTO 1 71.0% +28.5%
GAVIA, NYLA EMANI ANN 1 77.9% +17.9%
ERDMAN, CHAD G 1 80.2% +17.7%
JEFFERSON, QUOVAUNDA 1 79.4% +8.7%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19050479 High Brightness X-Ray Source For Semiconductor Metrology THOMAS, COURTNEY D —

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18387015 Methods And Systems For Measurement Of Semiconductor Structures With Active Tilt Correction FABIAN JR, ROBERTO 1d overdue
18229606 Methods And Systems For Systematic Error Compensation Across A Fleet Of Metrology Systems Based On A Trained Error Evaluation Model GAVIA, NYLA EMANI ANN 35d
18977795 Methods And Systems For Reflectometry Based Measurements Of Deep, Large Pitch Semiconductor Structures TRAN, JUDY DAO —
18887461 Electrical Performance Prediction Based On Structural Measurements Of Partially Fabricated Semiconductor Devices MENDOZA, ALEXANDRIA ARELLANO —
18743048 Measurements Of Semiconductor Structures Based On Data Collected At Prior Process Steps QUIGLEY, KYLE ROBERT —
17978844 Methods And Systems For Monitoring Metrology Fleet Productivity ERDMAN, CHAD G —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18387015 Methods And Systems For Measurement Of Semiconductor Structures With Active Tilt Correction FABIAN JR, ROBERTO 1d overdue
18229606 Methods And Systems For Systematic Error Compensation Across A Fleet Of Metrology Systems Based On A Trained Error Evaluation Model GAVIA, NYLA EMANI ANN 35d
18977795 Methods And Systems For Reflectometry Based Measurements Of Deep, Large Pitch Semiconductor Structures TRAN, JUDY DAO —
18972428 Measurements Of Complex Semiconductor Structures Based On Component Measurement Signals HANSEN, JONATHAN M —
18887461 Electrical Performance Prediction Based On Structural Measurements Of Partially Fabricated Semiconductor Devices MENDOZA, ALEXANDRIA ARELLANO —
18743048 Measurements Of Semiconductor Structures Based On Data Collected At Prior Process Steps QUIGLEY, KYLE ROBERT —
18416113 X-Ray Scatterometry Based Measurements Of Memory Array Structures Stacked With Complex Logic Structures LU, ZHIYU —
17978844 Methods And Systems For Monitoring Metrology Fleet Productivity ERDMAN, CHAD G —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
KLA 9
Hamamatsu Photonics 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28774
28572
28841
26651
21161
28991

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19050479 High Brightness X-Ray Source For Semiconductor Metrology Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. THOMAS, COURTNEY D 2884 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 11, 2025
18977795 Methods And Systems For Reflectometry Based Measurements Of Deep, Large Pitch Semiconductor Structures Kla Corporation TRAN, JUDY DAO 2877 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 11, 2024
18972428 Measurements Of Complex Semiconductor Structures Based On Component Measurement Signals Kla Corporation HANSEN, JONATHAN M 2877 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2024
18887461 Electrical Performance Prediction Based On Structural Measurements Of Partially Fabricated Semiconductor Devices Kla Corporation MENDOZA, ALEXANDRIA ARELLANO 2877 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 17, 2024
18743048 Measurements Of Semiconductor Structures Based On Data Collected At Prior Process Steps Kla Corporation QUIGLEY, KYLE ROBERT 2857 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 13, 2024
18416113 X-Ray Scatterometry Based Measurements Of Memory Array Structures Stacked With Complex Logic Structures Kla Corporation LU, ZHIYU 2665 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 18, 2024
18387015 Methods And Systems For Measurement Of Semiconductor Structures With Active Tilt Correction Kla Corporation FABIAN JR, ROBERTO 2877 §101 Non-Final OA 1d overdue Pending Nov 04, 2023
18229606 Methods And Systems For Systematic Error Compensation Across A Fleet Of Metrology Systems Based On A Trained Error Evaluation Model Kla Corporation GAVIA, NYLA EMANI ANN 2857 §101 Non-Final OA 35d Pending Aug 02, 2023
17978844 Methods And Systems For Monitoring Metrology Fleet Productivity Kla Corporation ERDMAN, CHAD G 2116 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 01, 2022
17590116 Methods And Systems For Accurate Measurement Of Deep Structures Having Distorted Geometry Kla Corporation JEFFERSON, QUOVAUNDA 2899 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 01, 2022

Managing Spano Law Group's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Spano Law Group's patent allowance rate?

99.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by Spano Law Group were allowed, across 219 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Spano Law Group average before allowance?

2.59 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Spano Law Group have?

10 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 2 clients, before 10 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month