Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Computing & Software • Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
7 pending office actions • 5 clients • 7 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Wang Hardoon, P.C. operates in Communications, managing 251 career applications. The firm has a resolved allowance rate pct of 91.91. This rate reflects its success in obtaining patent grants in the Communications sector. Practitioners can use the 251 career applications to evaluate the firm's historical outcomes. These metrics offer a basis for setting expectations for future filings in this technical field. The 91.91 resolved allowance rate pct provides a measure of success for applications managed by the firm.
The firm currently has 4 pending office actions. Its avg office actions per allowance is 2.31. This 2.31 avg office actions per allowance reflects the number of examiner interactions typically required to reach an allowance. With 4 pending office actions, the firm continues to manage its active cases. The 2.31 avg office actions per allowance helps practitioners estimate the resources needed for the examination phase. The 91.91 resolved allowance rate pct and the 4 pending office actions provide a view of the firm's performance.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 3 (43%) |
| §103 only | 2 (29%) |
| §102 only | 1 (14%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (14%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SYED, NABIL H | 1 | 60.4% | +30.2% |
| CORRIELUS, JEAN M | 1 | 84.0% | +12.5% |
| HICKS, SHIRLEY D. | 1 | 60.8% | +50.5% |
| MUSSELMAN, TIMOTHY A | 1 | 58.2% | +25.9% |
| DEMETER, HILINA K | 1 | 72.1% | +18.8% |
| SILVA, FRANK ALEXIS | 1 | 29.5% | +54.6% |
| TRISCHLER, JOHN T | 1 | 68.3% | +21.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18154932 | Hybrid Battery Cartridge | TRISCHLER, JOHN T | 24d overdue |
| 19171017 | SYSTEMS, APPARATUS, AND METHODS FOR ACCESS RESOLUTION BASED ON SITUATIONAL AWARENESS | SYED, NABIL H | — |
| 19081911 | FOUNDATION MODEL PIPELINE FOR REAL-TIME EMBEDDED DEVICES | CORRIELUS, JEAN M | — |
| 18480749 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DYNAMIC BATTERY MANAGEMENT | SILVA, FRANK ALEXIS | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19081951 | FOUNDATION MODEL PIPELINE FOR REAL-TIME EMBEDDED DEVICES | HICKS, SHIRLEY D. | 98d overdue |
| 18154932 | Hybrid Battery Cartridge | TRISCHLER, JOHN T | 24d overdue |
| 19171017 | SYSTEMS, APPARATUS, AND METHODS FOR ACCESS RESOLUTION BASED ON SITUATIONAL AWARENESS | SYED, NABIL H | — |
| 19081911 | FOUNDATION MODEL PIPELINE FOR REAL-TIME EMBEDDED DEVICES | CORRIELUS, JEAN M | — |
| 18976848 | Dynamic Neuropsychological Assessment Tool | MUSSELMAN, TIMOTHY A | — |
| 18613100 | APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR AUGMENTING VISION WITH REGION-OF-INTEREST BASED PROCESSING | DEMETER, HILINA K | — |
| 18480749 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DYNAMIC BATTERY MANAGEMENT | SILVA, FRANK ALEXIS | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| SoftEye, Inc. | 3 |
| Dunn, Inc. | 1 |
| Intraneuron, LLC | 1 |
| Infinity X1 LLC | 1 |
| IdeaPond LLC | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2168 | 1 |
| 2686 | 1 |
| 2617 | 1 |
| 2859 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19171017 | SYSTEMS, APPARATUS, AND METHODS FOR ACCESS RESOLUTION BASED ON SITUATIONAL AWARENESS | Dunn, Inc. | SYED, NABIL H | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 04, 2025 | |
| 19081911 | FOUNDATION MODEL PIPELINE FOR REAL-TIME EMBEDDED DEVICES | Softeye, Inc. | CORRIELUS, JEAN M | §101§102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 17, 2025 | |
| 19081951 | FOUNDATION MODEL PIPELINE FOR REAL-TIME EMBEDDED DEVICES | Softeye, Inc. | HICKS, SHIRLEY D. | 2168 | §102 | Final Rejection | 98d overdue | Pending | Mar 17, 2025 |
| 18976848 | Dynamic Neuropsychological Assessment Tool | Intraneuron, LLC | MUSSELMAN, TIMOTHY A | 2686 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 11, 2024 |
| 18613100 | APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR AUGMENTING VISION WITH REGION-OF-INTEREST BASED PROCESSING | Softeye, Inc. | DEMETER, HILINA K | 2617 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 21, 2024 |
| 18480749 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DYNAMIC BATTERY MANAGEMENT | Infinity X1 LLC | SILVA, FRANK ALEXIS | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 04, 2023 | |
| 18154932 | Hybrid Battery Cartridge | Ideapond LLC | TRISCHLER, JOHN T | 2859 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 24d overdue | Pending | Jan 16, 2023 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial