Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
7 pending office actions • 3 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Eugene Technology Co., Ltd. currently manages 6 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These 6 pending office actions are distributed across 5 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. The 5 distinct examiners indicate that most pending matters are being reviewed by different individuals. The 3 distinct art units suggest that the filings are categorized into separate administrative divisions within the patent office.
BENNETT, CHARLEE is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio. This examiner is responsible for 2 busiest_examiner_pending actions. The 2 busiest_examiner_pending actions are part of the 6 pending office actions currently active. BENNETT, CHARLEE and the other 5 distinct examiners handle the workload within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The 3 distinct art units provide the technical context for these applications.
The 6 pending office actions require coordination with 5 distinct examiners. BENNETT, CHARLEE holds 2 busiest_examiner_pending actions, showing a concentration of cases for this specific examiner. Practitioners should address the requirements of the 3 distinct art units to advance the portfolio. The Chemistry & Materials area defines the technical scope for all 6 pending office actions.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 5 (71%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (29%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BENNETT, CHARLEE | 2 | 58.8% | +35.1% |
| TRAN, SARAH ASHLEY | 1 | 69.3% | +20.2% |
| SWEELY, KURT D | 1 | 52.5% | +34.2% |
| KACKAR, RAM N | 1 | 40.6% | +57.8% |
| CHAN, LAUREEN | 1 | 57.6% | +54.5% |
| KLUNK, MARGARET D | 1 | 44.0% | +31.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18954498 | SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS | BENNETT, CHARLEE | — |
| 18416802 | SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD | CHAN, LAUREEN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18852434 | SUBSTRATE TRANSFER DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING ABNORMALITY OF SUBSTRATE TRANSFER DEVICE | TRAN, SARAH ASHLEY | — |
| 18954498 | SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS | BENNETT, CHARLEE | — |
| 18416864 | SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS | SWEELY, KURT D | — |
| 18416832 | PROCESS GAS SUPPLY DEVICE AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING SYSTEM HAVING THE SAME | KACKAR, RAM N | — |
| 18416879 | SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS | BENNETT, CHARLEE | — |
| 18416802 | SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD | CHAN, LAUREEN | — |
| 17522897 | SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING SUBSTRATE | KLUNK, MARGARET D | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1718 | 3 |
| 1716 | 3 |
| 3656 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18852434 | SUBSTRATE TRANSFER DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING ABNORMALITY OF SUBSTRATE TRANSFER DEVICE | TRAN, SARAH ASHLEY | 3656 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 15, 2025 |
| 18954498 | SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS | BENNETT, CHARLEE | 1718 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 20, 2024 |
| 18416864 | SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS | SWEELY, KURT D | 1718 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 18, 2024 |
| 18416832 | PROCESS GAS SUPPLY DEVICE AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING SYSTEM HAVING THE SAME | KACKAR, RAM N | 1716 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 18, 2024 |
| 18416879 | SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS | BENNETT, CHARLEE | 1718 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 18, 2024 |
| 18416802 | SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD | CHAN, LAUREEN | 1716 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 18, 2024 |
| 17522897 | SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING SUBSTRATE | KLUNK, MARGARET D | 1716 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 09, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialEugene Technology Co., Ltd. has 7 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 6 examiners.
Charlee Bennett has the most, with 2 of Eugene Technology Co., Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
