Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
7 pending office actions • 2 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 15 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (14%) |
| §103 only | 4 (57%) |
| Double-patenting only | 2 (29%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMIN, JWALANT B | 1 | 79.4% | +15.2% |
| CHOI, WILLIAM C | 1 | 92.6% | +4.1% |
| DEMETER, HILINA K | 1 | 72.0% | +19.2% |
| MARTINEZ, JOSEPH P | 1 | 86.2% | +2.6% |
| PINKNEY, DAWAYNE | 1 | 80.7% | +18.0% |
| JOSEPH, DENNIS P | 1 | 48.8% | +17.7% |
| JANSEN II, MICHAEL J | 1 | 66.8% | +18.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18922237 | HAPTIC SYSTEMS FOR HEAD-WORN COMPUTERS | CHOI, WILLIAM C | — |
| 18794884 | SEE-THROUGH COMPUTER DISPLAY SYSTEMS | PINKNEY, DAWAYNE | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18830062 | OPTICAL SYSTEMS FOR HEAD-WORN COMPUTERS | MARTINEZ, JOSEPH P | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14802878 | EXTERNAL USER INTERFACE FOR HEAD WORN COMPUTING | JANSEN II, MICHAEL J | 3d overdue |
| 18972779 | CONTENT PRESENTATION IN HEAD WORN COMPUTING | AMIN, JWALANT B | — |
| 18902307 | SEE-THROUGH COMPUTER DISPLAY SYSTEMS | DEMETER, HILINA K | — |
| 18794884 | SEE-THROUGH COMPUTER DISPLAY SYSTEMS | PINKNEY, DAWAYNE | — |
| 18598807 | SEE-THROUGH COMPUTER DISPLAY SYSTEMS | JOSEPH, DENNIS P | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2621 | 1 |
| 2626 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18972779 | CONTENT PRESENTATION IN HEAD WORN COMPUTING | AMIN, JWALANT B | — | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 06, 2024 |
| 18922237 | HAPTIC SYSTEMS FOR HEAD-WORN COMPUTERS | CHOI, WILLIAM C | — | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 21, 2024 |
| 18902307 | SEE-THROUGH COMPUTER DISPLAY SYSTEMS | DEMETER, HILINA K | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 30, 2024 |
| 18830062 | OPTICAL SYSTEMS FOR HEAD-WORN COMPUTERS | MARTINEZ, JOSEPH P | — | §101DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 10, 2024 |
| 18794884 | SEE-THROUGH COMPUTER DISPLAY SYSTEMS | PINKNEY, DAWAYNE | — | §103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 05, 2024 |
| 18598807 | SEE-THROUGH COMPUTER DISPLAY SYSTEMS | JOSEPH, DENNIS P | 2621 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 07, 2024 |
| 14802878 | EXTERNAL USER INTERFACE FOR HEAD WORN COMPUTING | JANSEN II, MICHAEL J | 2626 | §103 | Final Rejection | 3d overdue | Pending | Jul 17, 2015 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial