Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026

Renishaw PLC

10 pending office actions • 6 art units • 10 examiners • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 16 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (70%)
1
Medium (10%)
2
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (10%)
§112 only1 (10%)
Double-patenting only1 (10%)
Double-patenting + other1 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
20% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
6
Semiconductors
60% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEE, HWA S 1 72.7% +2.9%
CARLSON, JOSHUA MICHAEL 1 58.8% +37.6%
HINZE, LEO T 1 52.8% +10.6%
BENNETT, JENNIFER D 1 73.8% +18.4%
BENNETT, GEORGE B 1 79.5% +10.7%
MALEKZADEH, SEYED MASOUD 1 67.2% +31.8%
LARKIN, DANIEL SEAN 1 82.7% +7.9%
CARPENTER, JOSHUA S 1 50.9% +38.7%
COURSON, TANIA C 1 64.9% +27.5%
SPLIT, JAMES GERALD 1 61.6% +36.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18700029 MAPPING OF SENSOR ERROR DATA FROM A COORDINATE POSITIONING MACHINE LARKIN, DANIEL SEAN

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18016726 MEASUREMENT METHOD COURSON, TANIA C 104d overdue
18838745 OPTICAL APPARATUS LEE, HWA S 44d overdue
18838759 OPTICAL APPARATUS CARLSON, JOSHUA MICHAEL 9d
18779672 POSITION MEASUREMENT DEVICE BENNETT, JENNIFER D 20d
18512305 SELECTIVE SOLIDIFICATION APPARATUS AND METHODS CARPENTER, JOSHUA S 69d
18835098 AN ULTRASOUND INSPECTION PROBE FOR A MACHINE TOOL HINZE, LEO T
17431406 ULTRASOUND METHOD AND APPARATUS SPLIT, JAMES GERALD

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18750156 ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING APPARATUS AND METHOD MALEKZADEH, SEYED MASOUD 126d overdue
18016726 MEASUREMENT METHOD COURSON, TANIA C 104d overdue
18838759 OPTICAL APPARATUS CARLSON, JOSHUA MICHAEL 9d
18779672 POSITION MEASUREMENT DEVICE BENNETT, JENNIFER D 20d
18512305 SELECTIVE SOLIDIFICATION APPARATUS AND METHODS CARPENTER, JOSHUA S 69d
18835098 AN ULTRASOUND INSPECTION PROBE FOR A MACHINE TOOL HINZE, LEO T
18778558 COORDINATE POSITIONING MACHINE BENNETT, GEORGE B
17431406 ULTRASOUND METHOD AND APPARATUS SPLIT, JAMES GERALD

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2877 2
2855 2
2878 1
1754 1
1733 1
2858 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18838745 OPTICAL APPARATUS LEE, HWA S 2877 §102§103 Final Rejection 44d overdue Pending Aug 15, 2024
18838759 OPTICAL APPARATUS CARLSON, JOSHUA MICHAEL 2877 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 9d Pending Aug 15, 2024
18835098 AN ULTRASOUND INSPECTION PROBE FOR A MACHINE TOOL HINZE, LEO T §102§112 Non-Final OA Pending Aug 01, 2024
18779672 POSITION MEASUREMENT DEVICE BENNETT, JENNIFER D 2878 §102§103Other Non-Final OA 20d Pending Jul 22, 2024
18778558 COORDINATE POSITIONING MACHINE BENNETT, GEORGE B DP Non-Final OA Pending Jul 19, 2024
18750156 ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING APPARATUS AND METHOD MALEKZADEH, SEYED MASOUD 1754 §103§112DP Final Rejection 126d overdue Pending Jun 21, 2024
18700029 MAPPING OF SENSOR ERROR DATA FROM A COORDINATE POSITIONING MACHINE LARKIN, DANIEL SEAN 2855 §112 Non-Final OA Pending Apr 10, 2024
18512305 SELECTIVE SOLIDIFICATION APPARATUS AND METHODS CARPENTER, JOSHUA S 1733 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA 69d Pending Nov 17, 2023
18016726 MEASUREMENT METHOD COURSON, TANIA C 2855 §103§112 Final Rejection 104d overdue Pending Jan 18, 2023
17431406 ULTRASOUND METHOD AND APPARATUS SPLIT, JAMES GERALD 2858 §102§103§112 Final Rejection Pending Aug 16, 2021

Managing Renishaw PLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month