Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Ulvac Inc.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

7 pending office actions • 7 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Ulvac Inc. maintains a company patent portfolio with 8 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This volume of activity is spread across 7 distinct examiners and 7 distinct art units. Such a wide distribution suggests that the portfolio covers a broad range of chemical and material science innovations, requiring review from many different specialized groups at the patent office.

MCDONALD, RODNEY GLENN is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently managing 2 pending office actions. The remaining workload is distributed among the other distinct examiners. This means that while the busiest examiner has a higher workload, the portfolio is largely decentralized. For practitioners, this diversity of 7 distinct examiners and 7 distinct art units presents a complex management task, as they must adapt to many different sets of examiner behaviors. The fact that 8 pending office actions involve 7 distinct examiners highlights a high degree of variety in the examination process. This decentralized approach across 7 distinct art units ensures that each matter is reviewed by a specific technical expert.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (43%)
4
Medium (57%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (57%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (43%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
86% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
14% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BENNETT, CHARLEE 1 58.8% +35.1%
MCDONALD, RODNEY GLENN 1 63.7% +24.3%
DAGENAIS, KRISTEN A 1 64.0% +19.8%
CARTER, JONATHAN LANGDON 1 100.0% +0.0%
SONG, MATTHEW J 1 60.4% +13.9%
KLUNK, MARGARET D 1 44.0% +31.5%
MCCORMACK, JOHN PATRICK 1 71.3% +28.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18761500 ETCHING APPARATUS AND ETCHING METHOD CARTER, JONATHAN LANGDON —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18987741 VACUUM TREATMENT APPARATUS AND VACUUM TREATMENT METHOD BENNETT, CHARLEE 40d
18942842 PROCESS FOR PRE-LITHIATION AND EQUIPMENT FOR IMPLEMENTING THE SAME DAGENAIS, KRISTEN A —
18408369 ETCHING DEVICE AND ETCHING METHOD KLUNK, MARGARET D —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18872170 METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SPECIFIC RESISTIVITY AND STRESS OF TUNGSTEN THROUGH PVD SPUTTERING METHOD MCDONALD, RODNEY GLENN 19d
18987741 VACUUM TREATMENT APPARATUS AND VACUUM TREATMENT METHOD BENNETT, CHARLEE 40d
17996985 VACUUM FREEZE-DRYING METHOD, INJECTION NOZZLE FOR A VACUUM FREEZE-DRYING APPARATUS, AND VACUUM FREEZE-DRYING APPARATUS MCCORMACK, JOHN PATRICK 65d
18942842 PROCESS FOR PRE-LITHIATION AND EQUIPMENT FOR IMPLEMENTING THE SAME DAGENAIS, KRISTEN A —
18700218 METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CRYSTALLIZED LAMINATED STRUCTURE SONG, MATTHEW J —
18408369 ETCHING DEVICE AND ETCHING METHOD KLUNK, MARGARET D —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1718 1
1794 1
1717 1
1713 1
1714 1
1716 1
3762 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18987741 VACUUM TREATMENT APPARATUS AND VACUUM TREATMENT METHOD BENNETT, CHARLEE 1718 §103§112 Final Rejection 40d Pending Dec 19, 2024
18872170 METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SPECIFIC RESISTIVITY AND STRESS OF TUNGSTEN THROUGH PVD SPUTTERING METHOD MCDONALD, RODNEY GLENN 1794 §103 Final Rejection 19d Pending Dec 05, 2024
18942842 PROCESS FOR PRE-LITHIATION AND EQUIPMENT FOR IMPLEMENTING THE SAME DAGENAIS, KRISTEN A 1717 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 11, 2024
18761500 ETCHING APPARATUS AND ETCHING METHOD CARTER, JONATHAN LANGDON 1713 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 02, 2024
18700218 METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CRYSTALLIZED LAMINATED STRUCTURE SONG, MATTHEW J 1714 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 10, 2024
18408369 ETCHING DEVICE AND ETCHING METHOD KLUNK, MARGARET D 1716 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 09, 2024
17996985 VACUUM FREEZE-DRYING METHOD, INJECTION NOZZLE FOR A VACUUM FREEZE-DRYING APPARATUS, AND VACUUM FREEZE-DRYING APPARATUS MCCORMACK, JOHN PATRICK 3762 §103 Final Rejection 65d Pending Oct 24, 2022

Managing Ulvac Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Ulvac Inc. have?

Ulvac Inc. has 7 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 7 art units and 7 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Ulvac Inc. applications?

Charlee Bennett has the most, with 1 of Ulvac Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Ulvac Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month