Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

Jacob D Dascomb, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as DASCOMB, JACOB D

Tech Center 2100 • Art Units: 2195 2198 2199

This examiner grants 85% of resolved cases

Analysis

Jacob D. Dascomb is an examiner in Art Unit 2195 of Tech Center 2100. With 466 resolved cases, the examiner maintains an allowance rate of 85.2%. The median time to allowance is 1002 days, which provides a clear benchmark for pendency. This 1002 days duration indicates the typical timeline from filing to a final grant for applications in this docket.

The data shows an interview lift of 21.1%, suggesting that direct communication with the examiner is a beneficial tactic. This 21.1% lift indicates that cases involving an interview have a higher probability of allowance compared to the 85.2% baseline. Practitioners should consider requesting interviews to resolve outstanding issues, as direct dialogue appears to be effective in Tech Center 2100.

Top companies appearing before this examiner include VMware, Inc., Intel Corporation, and Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC. Legal representation is frequently provided by firms such as Ray Quinney & Nebeker, CANTOR COLBURN LLP, and Stevens Law Group. These entities have navigated the 466 resolved cases to secure patent rights. The 85.2% allowance rate and 21.1% interview lift provide a strong statistical foundation for prosecution strategy.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

85.2%
Allow Rate
+30.2% vs TC avg
515
Total Applications
+21.1%
Interview Lift
1002
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 466 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

11.6%
§101 Eligibility
2.2%
§102 Novelty
56.8%
§103 Obviousness
18.8%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18618773 USER INTERFACE COMMON COMPONENTS AND SCALABLE INTEGRABLE REUSABLE ISOLATED USER INTERFACE Final Rejection Capital One Services, LLC
18667935 DATA CENTER ORCHESTRATORS Non-Final OA Oracle International Corporation
18640290 APPLICATION RUNNING METHOD AND RELATED DEVICE Final Rejection HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
18411883 TASK EXECUTION METHOD AND APPARATUS Final Rejection HUAWEI CLOUD COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
18598545 INTER-PEER APPARATUS COMMUNICATIONS USING A CENTRAL NETWORK ENTITY Final Rejection QUALCOMM Incorporated
18337089 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR EMULATING OR PARA VIRTUALIZING A PHYSICAL FUNCTION OF A RESOURCE Non-Final OA Intel Corporation
18136972 HARDWARE-BASED ACCELERATORS IN CLOUD NATIVE APPLICATIONS WRITTEN IN HIGH LEVEL PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES Final Rejection Intel Corporation
18180415 SCHEDULING COMPUTATIONS IN DEEP NEURAL NETWORK BASED ON SPARSITY Final Rejection Intel Corporation
18171444 EFFICIENT AND DYNAMIC CORE ASSIGNMENT BASED ON INHERENT CORE CHARACTERISTICS Non-Final OA Intel Corporation
18777281 SCHEDULING HYBRID SHARING OF COMPUTE RESOURCES BETWEEN REAL-TIME WORKLOADS Non-Final OA Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC
18760728 RIGHTSIZING VIRTUAL MACHINE DEPLOYMENTS IN A CLOUD COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT Non-Final OA Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC
18760785 RIGHTSIZING VIRTUAL MACHINE DEPLOYMENTS IN A CLOUD COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT Non-Final OA Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC
18675503 INPUT VALIDATION IN TASK-ORIENTED SYSTEMS Non-Final OA INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
18493837 ZERO TOUCH STORAGE NODE CONTAINERS IN CLOUD NETWORKED STORAGE ENVIRONMENT Final Rejection International Business Machines Corporation
17504041 CONFIGURABLE PROCESSOR PARTITIONING Final Rejection NVIDIA Corporation
18724126 DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING METHOD, SYSTEM AND DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM Non-Final OA SUZHOU METABRAIN INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Jacob D Dascomb's allowance rate?

85.2% of resolved applications examined by Jacob D Dascomb were allowed (466 resolved cases), compared with 66.5% across Art Unit 2195 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Jacob D Dascomb?

This examiner's interview lift is +21.1 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Jacob D Dascomb take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Jacob D Dascomb took 1,002 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Jacob D Dascomb work in?

Jacob D Dascomb examines applications in Art Unit 2195 in Tech Center 2100 (Computing & Software).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month