Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Marcos D Pizarro Crespo, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as PIZARRO CRESPO, MARCOS D

Tech Center 2800 • Art Units: 2814

This examiner grants 67% of resolved cases

Analysis

PIZARRO CRESPO, MARCOS D is assigned to technology center 2800 and art unit 2814. The profile covers 572 resolved cases, with an allowance rate of 66.6%. The case volume supports a useful view of recurring outcomes, while the rate indicates that allowances form a substantial portion of the record.

The median time to allowance is 1334 days. Interview lift is 14.5%, showing that interviews are associated with a higher allowance rate than matters without interviews. The effect supports interviews as a targeted supplement to written prosecution.

The recurring companies are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd., and Texas Instruments Incorporated. The listed firms are JCIPRNET, BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLP, and Duane Morris LLP (UDC). Counsel should prepare for an extended prosecution path and use technically precise responses to preserve allowance prospects.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

66.6%
Allow Rate
-1.4% vs TC avg
601
Total Applications
+14.5%
Interview Lift
1334
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 572 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

0%
§101 Eligibility
25.0%
§102 Novelty
54.8%
§103 Obviousness
17.7%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18450730 IMAGE SENSOR WITH ENHANCED MULTI-SUBSTRATE STRUCTURES AND INTERCONNECTS Final Rejection Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
18143735 SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE Non-Final OA SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
17820090 DISPLAY DEVICE Non-Final OA Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
18253628 SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE Non-Final OA SONY GROUP CORPORATION
18294529 DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICE Non-Final OA BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO., LTD.
17476373 INTEGRATED DEVICE COMPRISING PILLAR INTERCONNECTS WITH VARIABLE SHAPES Non-Final OA QUALCOMM Incorporated
17934721 MICROELECTRONIC ASSEMBLIES HAVING A BRIDGE DIE WITH A LINED-INTERCONNECT Non-Final OA Intel Corporation
17126636 MICROELECTRONIC STRUCTURES INCLUDING BRIDGES Non-Final OA Intel Corporation
18162183 JOINT STRUCTURE Non-Final OA TDK CORPORATION
17514984 CONDUCTIVE MEMBERS WITH UNOBSTRUCTED INTERFACIAL AREA FOR DIE ATTACH IN FLIP CHIP PACKAGES Non-Final OA TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED
17504182 ELECTRONIC DEVICE HAVING CHEMICALLY COATED BUMP BONDS Final Rejection TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED
17879097 SELECTION GATE STRUCTURE AND FABRICATION METHOD FOR 3D MEMORY Final Rejection Applied Materials, Inc.
17089047 PMOS High-K Metal Gates Non-Final OA Applied Materials, Inc.
18311243 PACKAGE STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME Non-Final OA Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
18167081 SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF Non-Final OA Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
18156414 SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF Non-Final OA Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
18043730 ADHESIVE FOR SEMICONDUCTORS, AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME Non-Final OA Resonac Corporation
18166517 SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME Non-Final OA Industrial Technology Research Institute
18365273 NON-COMMON CAPPING LAYER ON AN ORGANIC DEVICE Final Rejection UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORPORATION

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Marcos D Pizarro Crespo's allowance rate?

66.6% of resolved applications examined by Marcos D Pizarro Crespo were allowed (572 resolved cases), compared with 74.2% across Art Unit 2814 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Marcos D Pizarro Crespo?

This examiner's interview lift is +14.5 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Marcos D Pizarro Crespo take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Marcos D Pizarro Crespo took 1,334 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Marcos D Pizarro Crespo work in?

Marcos D Pizarro Crespo examines applications in Art Unit 2814 in Tech Center 2800 (Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month