Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Adler, Pollock & Sheehan, P.C.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

11 pending office actions • 10 clients • 11 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C. is a patent law firm that specializes in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals, where it has managed 1383 career applications. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 87.76 percent, reflecting its results in securing patent protection for life sciences innovations. This rate serves as a benchmark for their performance in this technical area.

The firm currently has 10 pending office actions. Their prosecution history shows an average of 2.91 office actions per allowance. This metric indicates an efficient prosecution process, typically requiring the rounds of interaction with examiners recorded in the data to reach a grant. Practitioners can use the 2.91 average to estimate the timeline and effort for new Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals filings.

The 1383 career applications demonstrate the firm's experience in the industry. The 87.76 percent allowance rate and 2.91 office actions per allowance together describe a firm that is both successful and efficient in its prosecution efforts. The 10 pending office actions represent a portion of their current active workload.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1383 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.8%
Allowance Rate
n=1383
+0.53σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1383
2.9
OAs to Allowance
n=717
-0.47σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=717
956 days
Time to Allowance
n=717
+3.6pp
Interview Lift
n=1383
25.6%
RCE Rate
n=1383
1.7%
Appeal Rate
n=1383

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

78.9%
§101 Overcome
n=71
73.3%
§102 Overcome
n=288
77.2%
§103 Overcome
n=413
80.8%
§112 Overcome
n=400

Specialization & Scale

A61K, A61B, A61P
Top CPC Subclasses
14%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1383
3
Practitioners
n=1383
461.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1383

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (73%)
1
Medium (9%)
2
Easy (18%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (27%)
§103 only1 (9%)
§112 only2 (18%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (45%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
27% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
18% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
36% of docket
2
Business / Other
18% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ORTIZ, ADAM C 1 65.9% +34.6%
CHANG, OLIVIA C 1 84.4% +13.3%
MACCRATE, NICOLE PAIGE 1 56.8% +22.4%
MORALES, JON ERIC C 1 85.4% +10.0%
DOWNEY, JOHN R 1 59.7% +23.7%
CORNELIUS, CLAIRE ADRIENNE 1 66.7% +0.0%
STIGELL, THEODORE J 1 78.3% +14.9%
BOECKELMAN, JACOB A 1 35.2% +45.6%
WALTERS JR, ROBERT S 1 51.5% +50.4%
SMITH, DAVID E 1 85.2% +7.0%

Hard Cases (8)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17996489 TIME-RESOLVING HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING SPECTROSCOPY SMITH, DAVID E 97d overdue
18957094 MEMBRANE COVERED ATTRACTANT POD MACCRATE, NICOLE PAIGE 29d
19248266 LEVELING INFANT BED ORTIZ, ADAM C —
18970680 FUSION PLATE TO ASSIST FUSION OF A FIRST AND SECOND BONE CHANG, OLIVIA C —
18951376 HUMAN-POWERED STIMULATING/SENSING IMPLANT SYSTEM MORALES, JON ERIC C —
18842001 HYDROGEL CONDUCTIVITY IMPACTS SKIN DOSE FROM TUMOR TREATING FIELDS DOWNEY, JOHN R —
18708467 PREDICTING COVID-19 ANTIBODIES AMONG SURVIVORS WITH DEEP RNA SEQUENCING CORNELIUS, CLAIRE ADRIENNE —
18557561 DECELLULARIZED TISSUE HYDROGELS BOECKELMAN, JACOB A —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18638615 ACCESS PORT SYSTEM WITH SELF-ADJUSTING CATHETER LENGTH STIGELL, THEODORE J 84d overdue
18957094 MEMBRANE COVERED ATTRACTANT POD MACCRATE, NICOLE PAIGE 29d
19248266 LEVELING INFANT BED ORTIZ, ADAM C —
18970680 FUSION PLATE TO ASSIST FUSION OF A FIRST AND SECOND BONE CHANG, OLIVIA C —
18951376 HUMAN-POWERED STIMULATING/SENSING IMPLANT SYSTEM MORALES, JON ERIC C —
18842001 HYDROGEL CONDUCTIVITY IMPACTS SKIN DOSE FROM TUMOR TREATING FIELDS DOWNEY, JOHN R —
18557561 DECELLULARIZED TISSUE HYDROGELS BOECKELMAN, JACOB A —
18341067 DENTAL ALIGNER WALTERS JR, ROBERT S —

Client Portfolio (10 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36731
37751
36421
28451
37831
16551
17171
28811
17981

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19248266 LEVELING INFANT BED Kids2, LLC ORTIZ, ADAM C 3673 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 24, 2025
18970680 FUSION PLATE TO ASSIST FUSION OF A FIRST AND SECOND BONE Arc Techtonics, Inc. CHANG, OLIVIA C 3775 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2024
18957094 MEMBRANE COVERED ATTRACTANT POD American Insect Attractants LLC MACCRATE, NICOLE PAIGE 3642 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 29d Pending Nov 22, 2024
18951376 HUMAN-POWERED STIMULATING/SENSING IMPLANT SYSTEM Evoke Medical, LLC Dba Directsync Surgical MORALES, JON ERIC C §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 18, 2024
18842001 HYDROGEL CONDUCTIVITY IMPACTS SKIN DOSE FROM TUMOR TREATING FIELDS Rhode Island Hospital DOWNEY, JOHN R 2845 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 27, 2024
18708467 PREDICTING COVID-19 ANTIBODIES AMONG SURVIVORS WITH DEEP RNA SEQUENCING Rhode Island Hospital CORNELIUS, CLAIRE ADRIENNE §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 08, 2024
18638615 ACCESS PORT SYSTEM WITH SELF-ADJUSTING CATHETER LENGTH Imotik Biosolutions LLC STIGELL, THEODORE J 3783 §103 Non-Final OA 84d overdue Pending Apr 17, 2024
18557561 DECELLULARIZED TISSUE HYDROGELS The University of Nottingham BOECKELMAN, JACOB A 1655 §101§102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 26, 2023
18341067 DENTAL ALIGNER BIXBY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION WALTERS JR, ROBERT S 1717 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 26, 2023
17996489 TIME-RESOLVING HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING SPECTROSCOPY Research Instruments Corporation SMITH, DAVID E 2881 §102§103 Final Rejection 97d overdue Pending Oct 18, 2022
17933986 APPARATUS, METHOD, SYSTEM FOR THE DETERMINATION OF BLOODBORNE FACTORS INDICATIVE OF INFLAMMATION Alcor Scientific LLC TURK, NEIL N 1798 §112Other Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Sep 21, 2022

Managing Adler, Pollock & Sheehan, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month