Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Cic Consulting

Technology area: Networking & Security

24 pending office actions • 4 clients • 7 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 24 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 41 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

CIC Consulting focuses on Networking & Security across 249 career applications and has 22 pending office actions. The profile shows an active docket relative to the recorded application activity, making current response management an important operational consideration.

The resolved allowance rate is 90.7%, and the average office actions per allowance is 3.01. The allowance rate indicates favorable historical resolution results, while the action average shows that allowance commonly followed several examination actions. Practitioners can use the combination to plan continued prosecution work and to preserve claim flexibility in networking and security matters.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=249 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

90.7%
Allowance Rate
n=249
+0.44σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=249
3.0
OAs to Allowance
n=117
-0.18σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=117
476 days
Time to Allowance
n=117
-2.8pp
Interview Lift
n=249
62.8%
RCE Rate
n=249
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=249

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

66.7%
§101 Overcome
n=24
53.3%
§102 Overcome
n=90
49.6%
§103 Overcome
n=113
51.6%
§112 Overcome
n=93

Specialization & Scale

H04N, G06T, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
85%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=249
1
Practitioners
n=249
249.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=249

Portfolio Summary

24
Total Pending OAs
10
Non-Final OAs
12
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (29%)
17
Medium (71%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (4%)
§103 only10 (42%)
§102 only3 (12%)
Double-patenting + other4 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
21
Information Tech
88% of docket
2
Communications
8% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
4% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

240 h
Manual time on pending OAs
48 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
84 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
2.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A 10 83.7% +10.4%
CATTUNGAL, ROWINA J 8 74.9% +12.6%
BENNETT, STUART D 2 68.9% -14.2%
NASRI, MARYAM A 1 73.9% +2.5%
KHAN, OMER S 1 55.5% +40.4%
ALBERTALLI, BRIAN LOUIS 1 81.8% +16.8%
ROBINSON, KYLE G 1 11.7% +16.6%

Quick Wins (9)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18964129 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A 8d
19255830 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A 49d
18964117 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A 55d
19255802 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A —
19255818 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A —
19255809 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A —
19255839 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A —
18964113 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A —

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18361929 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SHARING DATA IN INTELLIGENT PHARMACOVIGILANCE PLATFORM ROBINSON, KYLE G 14d
19569334 METHOD AND APPARATUS OF ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE DATA BASED ON TREE STRUCTURE-BASED BLOCK DIVISION CATTUNGAL, ROWINA J —
19452724 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A —
19056406 METHOD AND APPARATUS OF ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE DATA BASED ON TREE STRUCTURE-BASED BLOCK DIVISION CATTUNGAL, ROWINA J —
19056432 METHOD AND APPARATUS OF ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE DATA BASED ON TREE STRUCTURE-BASED BLOCK DIVISION CATTUNGAL, ROWINA J —
19056424 METHOD AND APPARATUS OF ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE DATA BASED ON TREE STRUCTURE-BASED BLOCK DIVISION CATTUNGAL, ROWINA J —
18872276 DISPLAY-BASED COMMUNICATION SYSTEM ALBERTALLI, BRIAN LOUIS —

Interview Candidates (21)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18964129 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A 8d
18361929 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SHARING DATA IN INTELLIGENT PHARMACOVIGILANCE PLATFORM ROBINSON, KYLE G 14d
19255830 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A 49d
18964117 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A 55d
19569342 METHOD AND APPARATUS OF ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE DATA BASED ON TREE STRUCTURE-BASED BLOCK DIVISION CATTUNGAL, ROWINA J —
19569355 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS CATTUNGAL, ROWINA J —
19569334 METHOD AND APPARATUS OF ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE DATA BASED ON TREE STRUCTURE-BASED BLOCK DIVISION CATTUNGAL, ROWINA J —
19452724 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
248810
24258
24812
24841
26861
26561
36851

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19569342 METHOD AND APPARATUS OF ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE DATA BASED ON TREE STRUCTURE-BASED BLOCK DIVISION B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. CATTUNGAL, ROWINA J 2425 §102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 17, 2026
19569355 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. CATTUNGAL, ROWINA J 2425 §102Other Final Rejection — Pending Mar 17, 2026
19569334 METHOD AND APPARATUS OF ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE DATA BASED ON TREE STRUCTURE-BASED BLOCK DIVISION B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. CATTUNGAL, ROWINA J 2425 §102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 17, 2026
19562388 ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INTRA PREDICTING A CODING UNIT PARTITION B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. BENNETT, STUART D 2481 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 10, 2026
19452724 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A 2488 §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 19, 2026
19435741 ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INTRA PREDICTING A CODING UNIT PARTITION B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. BENNETT, STUART D 2481 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 30, 2025
19358038 IMAGE ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND DEVICE B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. NASRI, MARYAM A 2484 §102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 14, 2025
19255802 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A 2488 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Jun 30, 2025
19255818 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A 2488 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Jun 30, 2025
19255809 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A 2488 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Jun 30, 2025
19255830 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A 2488 §103Other Final Rejection 49d Pending Jun 30, 2025
19255839 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A 2488 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Jun 30, 2025
19056463 METHOD AND APPARATUS OF ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE DATA BASED ON TREE STRUCTURE-BASED BLOCK DIVISION B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. CATTUNGAL, ROWINA J 2425 §102DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 18, 2025
19056406 METHOD AND APPARATUS OF ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE DATA BASED ON TREE STRUCTURE-BASED BLOCK DIVISION B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. CATTUNGAL, ROWINA J 2425 §103§112Other Final Rejection — Pending Feb 18, 2025
19056432 METHOD AND APPARATUS OF ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE DATA BASED ON TREE STRUCTURE-BASED BLOCK DIVISION B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. CATTUNGAL, ROWINA J 2425 §103§112Other Final Rejection — Pending Feb 18, 2025
19056424 METHOD AND APPARATUS OF ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE DATA BASED ON TREE STRUCTURE-BASED BLOCK DIVISION B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. CATTUNGAL, ROWINA J 2425 §103§112Other Final Rejection — Pending Feb 18, 2025
19056444 METHOD AND APPARATUS OF ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE DATA BASED ON TREE STRUCTURE-BASED BLOCK DIVISION B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. CATTUNGAL, ROWINA J 2425 §102DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 18, 2025
18987279 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GROUPING OBJECTS FOR SENSOR-SHARING SERVICE Korea National University Of Transportation Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation KHAN, OMER S 2686 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 19, 2024
18872276 DISPLAY-BASED COMMUNICATION SYSTEM Batoners Inc. ALBERTALLI, BRIAN LOUIS 2656 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2024
18964129 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A 2488 §103 Final Rejection 8d Pending Nov 29, 2024
18964113 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A 2488 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 29, 2024
18964117 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A 2488 §103Other Non-Final OA 55d Pending Nov 29, 2024
18802621 IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS B1 Institute of Image Technology, Inc. WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A 2488 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 13, 2024
18361929 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SHARING DATA IN INTELLIGENT PHARMACOVIGILANCE PLATFORM Selta Square Co., Ltd. ROBINSON, KYLE G 3685 §101 Final Rejection 14d Pending Jul 31, 2023

Managing Cic Consulting's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Cic Consulting's patent allowance rate?

90.7% of resolved applications prosecuted by Cic Consulting were allowed, across 249 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Cic Consulting average before allowance?

3.01 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Cic Consulting have?

24 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 7 examiners in 7 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month