Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Dority & Manning, P.A. And

18 pending office actions • 2 clients • 18 examiners • 11 art units • 0 of 18 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 71 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

18
Total Pending OAs
13
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 18 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

7
Overdue
1
Due this week
7
Due this month
3
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 18 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (7)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (7)Due ≤ 60 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (17%)
12
Medium (67%)
2
Easy (11%)
1
Unknown (6%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (17%)
§103 only9 (50%)
§102 only3 (17%)
§112 only2 (11%)
No statute on record1 (6%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
11% of docket
16
Mechanical / Eng
89% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

180 h
Manual time on pending OAs
36 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
63 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
QI, ZHENGQING J 1 68.8% +13.8%
MANCHO, RONNIE M 1 75.6% +2.4%
INGRAM, THOMAS P 1 87.4% +6.1%
RAMESH, KRISHNAN 1 80.4% +18.0%
TRIVEDI, ATUL 1 91.1% +8.5%
TANG, BRYANT 1 89.2% -1.1%
YOUNG, TIFFANY P 1 79.6% +22.9%
ALAM, NAEEM TASLIM 1 84.2% +10.7%
LEE, TYLER J 1 92.0% +6.8%
MERLINO, DAVID P 1 71.2% +12.1%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18925624 Learned Validation Metric for Evaluating Autonomous Vehicle Motion Planning Performance TANG, BRYANT 22d overdue
18812632 Planar-Beam, Light Detection and Ranging System LEE, TYLER J 19d overdue
18990620 Autonomous Vehicles Featuring Machine-Learned Yield Model RAMESH, KRISHNAN 40d

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18825869 Systems and Methods for Generating Physically Realistic Trajectories ALAM, NAEEM TASLIM 22d overdue
18990684 Sparse Convolutional Neural Networks INGRAM, THOMAS P 28d
19007237 Systems and Methods to Obtain Feedback in Response to Autonomous Vehicle Failure Events MANCHO, RONNIE M 35d

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19212150 FOCAL PLANE ARRAY SYSTEM FOR LIDAR QI, ZHENGQING J 35d overdue
18825869 Systems and Methods for Generating Physically Realistic Trajectories ALAM, NAEEM TASLIM 22d overdue
18890881 Systems and Methods for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping Using Asynchronous Multi-View Cameras YOUNG, TIFFANY P 8d
18798488 Systems and Methods for Autonomous Vehicle Validation MERLINO, DAVID P 8d
18990620 Autonomous Vehicles Featuring Machine-Learned Yield Model RAMESH, KRISHNAN 40d

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Aurora Operations 17
OURS Technology Inc. 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36453
36633
36682
36652
28722
36571
36611
36581
36641
36661

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19212150 FOCAL PLANE ARRAY SYSTEM FOR LIDAR Ours Technology Inc. QI, ZHENGQING J 3645 §112 Final Rejection 35d overdue Pending May 19, 2025
19007237 Systems and Methods to Obtain Feedback in Response to Autonomous Vehicle Failure Events Aurora Operations, Inc. MANCHO, RONNIE M 3657 §101 Non-Final OA 35d Pending Dec 31, 2024
18990684 Sparse Convolutional Neural Networks Aurora Operations, Inc. INGRAM, THOMAS P 3668 §101 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Dec 20, 2024
18990620 Autonomous Vehicles Featuring Machine-Learned Yield Model Aurora Operations, Inc. RAMESH, KRISHNAN 3663 §102 Non-Final OA 40d Pending Dec 20, 2024
18984133 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ENHANCED VELOCITY RESOLUTION AND SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO IN OPTICAL PHASE-ENCODED RANGE DETECTION Aurora Operations, Inc. TRIVEDI, ATUL 3661 Other Non-Final OA 12d Pending Dec 17, 2024
18925624 Learned Validation Metric for Evaluating Autonomous Vehicle Motion Planning Performance Aurora Operations, Inc. TANG, BRYANT 3658 §103 Non-Final OA 22d overdue Pending Oct 24, 2024
18890881 Systems and Methods for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping Using Asynchronous Multi-View Cameras Aurora Operations, Inc. YOUNG, TIFFANY P 3665 §102 Non-Final OA 8d Pending Sep 20, 2024
18825869 Systems and Methods for Generating Physically Realistic Trajectories Aurora Operations, Inc. ALAM, NAEEM TASLIM 3668 §101 Non-Final OA 22d overdue Pending Sep 05, 2024
18812632 Planar-Beam, Light Detection and Ranging System Aurora Operations, Inc. LEE, TYLER J 3663 §103 Non-Final OA 19d overdue Pending Aug 22, 2024
18798488 Systems and Methods for Autonomous Vehicle Validation Aurora Operations, Inc. MERLINO, DAVID P 3665 §102 Non-Final OA 8d Pending Aug 08, 2024
18752228 Fault-Tolerant Control of an Autonomous Vehicle with Multiple Control Lanes Aurora Operations, Inc. KERRIGAN, MICHAEL V 3664 §103 Final Rejection 5d Pending Jun 24, 2024
18658570 Manufacturing Process for Semiconductor Optical Device for LIDAR Sensor System Aurora Operations, Inc. LAVARIAS, ARNEL C 2872 §112 Non-Final OA 26d Pending May 08, 2024
18587208 LIDAR SYSTEM FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE Aurora Operations, Inc. CASS, JEAN PAUL 3666 §103 Final Rejection 49d overdue Pending Feb 26, 2024
18585943 Training a Motion Planning System for an Autonomous Vehicle Aurora Operations, Inc. VELASQUEZ VANEGAS, RAFAEL 3667 §103 Final Rejection 54d Pending Feb 23, 2024
18465561 LIDAR SENSOR SYSTEM Aurora Operations, Inc. GAGNON, GRANT A 2872 §103 Non-Final OA 23d Pending Sep 12, 2023
18358443 End-To-End Interpretable Motion Planner for Autonomous Vehicles Aurora Operations, Inc. UNDERWOOD, BAKARI 3663 §103 Final Rejection 23d Pending Jul 25, 2023
18191621 Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) Module for a LIDAR System Aurora Operations, Inc. NOEL, JEMPSON 3645 §103 Non-Final OA 22d overdue Pending Mar 28, 2023
17723340 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SIDELOBE SUPPRESSION IN PHASE ENCODED DOPPLER LIDAR Aurora Operations, Inc. NICKERSON, SAMANTHA K 3645 §103 Non-Final OA 4d overdue Pending Apr 18, 2022

Managing Dority & Manning, P.A. And's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month