Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Aurora Operations, Inc.

20 pending office actions • 11 art units • 20 examiners • 0 of 20 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 94 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

20
Total Pending OAs
16
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 20 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

9
Overdue
1
Due this week
7
Due this month
3
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 20 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (9)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (7)Due ≤ 60 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (15%)
15
Medium (75%)
1
Easy (5%)
1
Unknown (5%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (15%)
§103 only11 (55%)
§102 only4 (20%)
§112 only1 (5%)
No statute on record1 (5%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
10% of docket
18
Mechanical / Eng
90% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

200 h
Manual time on pending OAs
40 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
70 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MANCHO, RONNIE M 1 75.6% +2.4%
EMMETT, MADISON B 1 79.8% +11.0%
RAMESH, KRISHNAN 1 80.4% +18.0%
INGRAM, THOMAS P 1 87.4% +6.1%
TRIVEDI, ATUL 1 91.1% +8.5%
TANG, BRYANT 1 89.2% -1.1%
REDHEAD JR., ASHLEY L 1 90.7% +9.7%
YOUNG, TIFFANY P 1 79.6% +22.9%
ALAM, NAEEM TASLIM 1 84.2% +10.7%
LEE, TYLER J 1 92.0% +6.8%

Quick Wins (4)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18903893 DUAL MODE MAP FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE REDHEAD JR., ASHLEY L 43d overdue
18925624 Learned Validation Metric for Evaluating Autonomous Vehicle Motion Planning Performance TANG, BRYANT 22d overdue
18812632 Planar-Beam, Light Detection and Ranging System LEE, TYLER J 19d overdue
18990620 Autonomous Vehicles Featuring Machine-Learned Yield Model RAMESH, KRISHNAN 40d

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18825869 Systems and Methods for Generating Physically Realistic Trajectories ALAM, NAEEM TASLIM 22d overdue
18990684 Sparse Convolutional Neural Networks INGRAM, THOMAS P 28d
19007237 Systems and Methods to Obtain Feedback in Response to Autonomous Vehicle Failure Events MANCHO, RONNIE M 35d

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18825869 Systems and Methods for Generating Physically Realistic Trajectories ALAM, NAEEM TASLIM 22d overdue
19002202 AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE SENSOR VISIBILITY MANAGEMENT EMMETT, MADISON B 4d overdue
18890881 Systems and Methods for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping Using Asynchronous Multi-View Cameras YOUNG, TIFFANY P 8d
18990620 Autonomous Vehicles Featuring Machine-Learned Yield Model RAMESH, KRISHNAN 40d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3663 3
3665 3
3658 2
3668 2
3661 2
2872 2
3645 2
3657 1
3664 1
3666 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19007237 Systems and Methods to Obtain Feedback in Response to Autonomous Vehicle Failure Events MANCHO, RONNIE M 3657 §101 Non-Final OA 35d Pending Dec 31, 2024
19002202 AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE SENSOR VISIBILITY MANAGEMENT EMMETT, MADISON B 3658 §102 Non-Final OA 4d overdue Pending Dec 26, 2024
18990620 Autonomous Vehicles Featuring Machine-Learned Yield Model RAMESH, KRISHNAN 3663 §102 Non-Final OA 40d Pending Dec 20, 2024
18990684 Sparse Convolutional Neural Networks INGRAM, THOMAS P 3668 §101 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Dec 20, 2024
18984133 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ENHANCED VELOCITY RESOLUTION AND SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO IN OPTICAL PHASE-ENCODED RANGE DETECTION TRIVEDI, ATUL 3661 Other Non-Final OA 12d Pending Dec 17, 2024
18925624 Learned Validation Metric for Evaluating Autonomous Vehicle Motion Planning Performance TANG, BRYANT 3658 §103 Non-Final OA 22d overdue Pending Oct 24, 2024
18903893 DUAL MODE MAP FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE REDHEAD JR., ASHLEY L 3661 §103 Non-Final OA 43d overdue Pending Oct 01, 2024
18890881 Systems and Methods for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping Using Asynchronous Multi-View Cameras YOUNG, TIFFANY P 3665 §102 Non-Final OA 8d Pending Sep 20, 2024
18825869 Systems and Methods for Generating Physically Realistic Trajectories ALAM, NAEEM TASLIM 3668 §101 Non-Final OA 22d overdue Pending Sep 05, 2024
18812632 Planar-Beam, Light Detection and Ranging System LEE, TYLER J 3663 §103 Non-Final OA 19d overdue Pending Aug 22, 2024
18798488 Systems and Methods for Autonomous Vehicle Validation MERLINO, DAVID P 3665 §102 Non-Final OA 8d Pending Aug 08, 2024
18758747 PRIORITIZED SENSOR DATA FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE BADII, BEHRANG 3665 §103 Non-Final OA 31d overdue Pending Jun 28, 2024
18752228 Fault-Tolerant Control of an Autonomous Vehicle with Multiple Control Lanes KERRIGAN, MICHAEL V 3664 §103 Final Rejection 5d Pending Jun 24, 2024
18658570 Manufacturing Process for Semiconductor Optical Device for LIDAR Sensor System LAVARIAS, ARNEL C 2872 §112 Non-Final OA 26d Pending May 08, 2024
18587208 LIDAR SYSTEM FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE CASS, JEAN PAUL 3666 §103 Final Rejection 49d overdue Pending Feb 26, 2024
18585943 Training a Motion Planning System for an Autonomous Vehicle VELASQUEZ VANEGAS, RAFAEL 3667 §103 Final Rejection 54d Pending Feb 23, 2024
18465561 LIDAR SENSOR SYSTEM GAGNON, GRANT A 2872 §103 Non-Final OA 23d Pending Sep 12, 2023
18358443 End-To-End Interpretable Motion Planner for Autonomous Vehicles UNDERWOOD, BAKARI 3663 §103 Final Rejection 23d Pending Jul 25, 2023
18191621 Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) Module for a LIDAR System NOEL, JEMPSON 3645 §103 Non-Final OA 22d overdue Pending Mar 28, 2023
17723340 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SIDELOBE SUPPRESSION IN PHASE ENCODED DOPPLER LIDAR NICKERSON, SAMANTHA K 3645 §103 Non-Final OA 4d overdue Pending Apr 18, 2022

Managing Aurora Operations, Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month