Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 14, 2026

Fletcher Yoder Pc

6 pending office actions • 2 clients • 6 examiners • 5 art units • 2 of 6 (33%) have an AI response strategy ready • 138 patents granted in the last 365 days

Quality Metrics (n=66986 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

91.0%
Allowance Rate
n=66986
+0.62σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=66986
3.4
OAs to Allowance
n=45189
-0.09σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=45189
1101 days
Time to Allowance
n=45189
+4.9pp
Interview Lift
n=66986
26.0%
RCE Rate
n=66986
3.8%
Appeal Rate
n=66986

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

86.9%
§101 Overcome
n=1469
89.8%
§102 Overcome
n=6286
87.4%
§103 Overcome
n=27485
93.0%
§112 Overcome
n=3879

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
15%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=66986
20
Practitioners
n=66986
3349.3
Apps / Practitioner
n=66986

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (33%)
4
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (50%)
§102 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
33% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
33% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
17% of docket
1
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HASSAN, AURANGZEB 1 80.2% +17.1%
CRAWFORD, JASON 1 84.9% +8.9%
MALEVIC, DJURA 1 78.1% +10.3%
LIANG, HONGYE 1 63.4% +53.1%
PHAN, DEAN 1 74.0% +14.0%
EWALD, JOHN ROBERT DAKITA 1 79.2% +50.0%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19176114 INTERRUPT HANDLING BY MIGRATING INTERRUPTS BETWEEN PROCESSING CORES HASSAN, AURANGZEB
19029471 NETWORK-ON-CHIP (NOC) WITH FLEXIBLE DATA WIDTH CRAWFORD, JASON

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18075183 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UCIe-AIB CHIPLET INTERFACE INTEROPERABILITY PHAN, DEAN 44d overdue
17560826 Dynamic On-Demand Device-Assisted Paging EWALD, JOHN ROBERT DAKITA 32d overdue

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18075183 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UCIe-AIB CHIPLET INTERFACE INTEROPERABILITY PHAN, DEAN 44d overdue
17560826 Dynamic On-Demand Device-Assisted Paging EWALD, JOHN ROBERT DAKITA 32d overdue
18795148 INTEGRATED CIRCUIT PACKAGE WITH ELECTRO-OPTICAL INTERCONNECT CIRCUITRY MALEVIC, DJURA 41d
19176114 INTERRUPT HANDLING BY MIGRATING INTERRUPTS BETWEEN PROCESSING CORES HASSAN, AURANGZEB
18433925 APPOINTMENT-BASED NAVIGATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS LIANG, HONGYE

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Intel 5
Uipco LLC 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28441
28841
36641
21841
21991

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19176114 INTERRUPT HANDLING BY MIGRATING INTERRUPTS BETWEEN PROCESSING CORES Altera Corporation HASSAN, AURANGZEB §103 Non-Final OA Pending Apr 10, 2025
19029471 NETWORK-ON-CHIP (NOC) WITH FLEXIBLE DATA WIDTH Altera Corporation CRAWFORD, JASON 2844 §102 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 17, 2025
18795148 INTEGRATED CIRCUIT PACKAGE WITH ELECTRO-OPTICAL INTERCONNECT CIRCUITRY Intel Corporation MALEVIC, DJURA 2884 §103 Non-Final OA 41d AI Ready Aug 05, 2024
18433925 APPOINTMENT-BASED NAVIGATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS Uipco, LLC LIANG, HONGYE 3664 §103 Final Rejection Pending Feb 06, 2024
18075183 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UCIe-AIB CHIPLET INTERFACE INTEROPERABILITY Intel Corporation PHAN, DEAN 2184 §102§103 Non-Final OA 44d overdue Pending Dec 05, 2022
17560826 Dynamic On-Demand Device-Assisted Paging Intel Corporation EWALD, JOHN ROBERT DAKITA 2199 §103§112 Final Rejection 32d overdue AI Ready Dec 23, 2021

Managing Fletcher Yoder Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month