Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Franklin & Associates International Inc.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 6 clients • 7 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Franklin & Associates International Inc has a career history of 419 applications, primarily within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate pct of 83.75. On average, the firm navigates the prosecution process with an avg office actions per allowance of 2.41, suggesting a path to allowance for its clients.

There are currently 419 career applications on record, with 4 pending office actions currently requiring attention. The resolved allowance rate pct of 83.75 reflects the firm's results in the Chemistry & Materials sector. Furthermore, the avg office actions per allowance of 2.41 provides a metric for the firm's efficiency in responding to examiner rejections. These data points collectively illustrate the firm's established presence in chemical patent prosecution.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=419 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

83.8%
Allowance Rate
n=419
+0.41σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=419
2.4
OAs to Allowance
n=304
-0.59σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=304
898 days
Time to Allowance
n=304
+12.5pp
Interview Lift
n=419
14.6%
RCE Rate
n=419
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=419

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

70.7%
§101 Overcome
n=58
73.2%
§102 Overcome
n=157
80.8%
§103 Overcome
n=219
82.9%
§112 Overcome
n=146

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04N, G02B
Top CPC Subclasses
20%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=419
0
Practitioners
n=419
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=419 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (57%)
3
Medium (43%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (29%)
§102 only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (57%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
14% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
29% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
29% of docket
2
Business / Other
29% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CUMAR, NATHAN 1 78.8% +14.4%
FERNANDES, ERROL V 1 85.4% +10.8%
STEITZ, RACHEL RUNNING 1 54.4% +26.1%
DIETZ, NOE ROBERT 1 0.0% +0.0%
VALENZUELA, PATRICIA D 1 90.3% +2.0%
COOLEY, CHARLES E 1 79.0% +15.2%
HUSTOFT, JUSTIN WAYNE 1 67.0% +21.9%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18764470 Display Panel and Manufacturing Method Thereof FERNANDES, ERROL V —
18434831 Display Panel, Preparation Method and Display Apparatus VALENZUELA, PATRICIA D —

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18656524 FALSE EYELASH APPARATUS AND METHODS STEITZ, RACHEL RUNNING 89d overdue
18905094 LUGGAGE SMART DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS THEREOF CUMAR, NATHAN 16d overdue
18032175 AN ELEMENT FOR A CO-ROTATING TWIN-SCREW PROCESSOR COOLEY, CHARLES E 14d
18595348 AEROSOL CONTAINMENT APPARATUS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS DIETZ, NOE ROBERT —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18656524 FALSE EYELASH APPARATUS AND METHODS STEITZ, RACHEL RUNNING 89d overdue
18905094 LUGGAGE SMART DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS THEREOF CUMAR, NATHAN 16d overdue
17610693 OPTICAL SYSTEM, CAMERA MODULE, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS HUSTOFT, JUSTIN WAYNE 8d
18032175 AN ELEMENT FOR A CO-ROTATING TWIN-SCREW PROCESSOR COOLEY, CHARLES E 14d
18764470 Display Panel and Manufacturing Method Thereof FERNANDES, ERROL V —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36751
37721
28121
17741
28721

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18905094 LUGGAGE SMART DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS THEREOF Package, Inc. CUMAR, NATHAN 3675 §102§103 Non-Final OA 16d overdue Pending Oct 02, 2024
18764470 Display Panel and Manufacturing Method Thereof HKC Corporation Limited FERNANDES, ERROL V §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 05, 2024
18656524 FALSE EYELASH APPARATUS AND METHODS Hal J Hansen STEITZ, RACHEL RUNNING 3772 §102§103§112Other Final Rejection 89d overdue Pending May 06, 2024
18595348 AEROSOL CONTAINMENT APPARATUS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS Airsolve LLC DIETZ, NOE ROBERT §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 04, 2024
18434831 Display Panel, Preparation Method and Display Apparatus HKC Corporation Limited VALENZUELA, PATRICIA D 2812 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 07, 2024
18032175 AN ELEMENT FOR A CO-ROTATING TWIN-SCREW PROCESSOR Steer Engineering Private Limited COOLEY, CHARLES E 1774 §102§103 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Apr 15, 2023
17610693 OPTICAL SYSTEM, CAMERA MODULE, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS Jiangxi Jingchao Optical Co., Ltd. HUSTOFT, JUSTIN WAYNE 2872 §103 Non-Final OA 8d Pending Nov 11, 2021

Managing Franklin & Associates International Inc.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month