Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

J.C. Patents

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

19 pending office actions • 6 clients • 19 examiners • 18 art units • 0 of 19 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 82 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

J.C. PATENTS works in Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics and has 6031 career applications. Its resolved allowance rate is 83.29%, while the current portfolio includes 19 pending office actions. These figures show a substantial prosecution history with a high share of resolved matters resulting in allowance.

The average of 2.67 office actions per allowance indicates that allowed cases commonly require more than one substantive prosecution step. For a prospective client, the combination of an 83.29% resolved allowance rate and 2.67 average office actions provides context for evaluating both outcome expectations and the likely need for continued responses in this technology area. The 19 pending office actions identify an active group of matters requiring present attention.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=6031 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

83.3%
Allowance Rate
n=6031
+0.36σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=6031
2.7
OAs to Allowance
n=4859
-0.32σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=4859
934 days
Time to Allowance
n=4859
+4.0pp
Interview Lift
n=6031
18.0%
RCE Rate
n=6031
0.6%
Appeal Rate
n=6031

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

78.5%
§101 Overcome
n=274
81.1%
§102 Overcome
n=2010
81.8%
§103 Overcome
n=2780
84.7%
§112 Overcome
n=1419

Specialization & Scale

H01L, G06F, H10D
Top CPC Subclasses
22%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=6031
0
Practitioners
n=6031
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=6031 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

19
Total Pending OAs
11
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
2
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 7 days (2)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (37%)
8
Medium (42%)
4
Easy (21%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (5%)
§101 + other1 (5%)
§103 only7 (37%)
§102 only1 (5%)
§112 only4 (21%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (26%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
11% of docket
2
Information Tech
11% of docket
1
Communications
5% of docket
13
Semiconductors
68% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
5% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

190 h
Manual time on pending OAs
38 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
66 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HEISTERKAMP, JUSTIN BRYCE 1 98.8% +2.2%
SIPLING, KENNETH MARK 1 75.0% +16.7%
DRODGE, JOSEPH W 1 78.3% +38.0%
HASSAN, ALI MOHAMAD 1 68.8% +37.5%
HO, ANNA THI 1 39.3% +34.6%
LEE, SANGKYUNG 1 59.3% +9.5%
LUKE, DANIEL M 1 71.4% +18.7%
TRAN, TIEN 1 89.7% +14.3%
SLOMS, NICHOLAS 1 68.6% +10.5%
AU, BAC H 1 81.1% +10.9%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19023284 MEMORY DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF HEISTERKAMP, JUSTIN BRYCE —
18642831 MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME TRAN, TIEN —
18608932 3D MEMORY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF AU, BAC H —

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17684380 RECHARGEABLE BATTERY ENDURANCE ENHANCING DEVICE LEE, JOHN 107d overdue
18888157 3D MEMORY DEVICE SIPLING, KENNETH MARK —
18827659 Data-knowledge-driven Approach for Optimal Control of Wastewater Treatment Processes DRODGE, JOSEPH W —
18812799 METHOD FOR EVALUATING LANGUAGE MODEL AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE HASSAN, ALI MOHAMAD —
18671241 SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE LUKE, DANIEL M —
18471292 CAPACITOR STRUCTURE AHMAD, KHAJA —
18177138 MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME RONO, VINCENT KIPKEMOI —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18617884 MULTI-NODE SERVER NETWORK SYSTEM SLOMS, NICHOLAS 28d
18888157 3D MEMORY DEVICE SIPLING, KENNETH MARK —
18827659 Data-knowledge-driven Approach for Optimal Control of Wastewater Treatment Processes DRODGE, JOSEPH W —
18812799 METHOD FOR EVALUATING LANGUAGE MODEL AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE HASSAN, ALI MOHAMAD —
18776151 ATOMIZATION DEVICE HO, ANNA THI —
18671241 SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE LUKE, DANIEL M —
18642831 MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME TRAN, TIEN —
18608932 3D MEMORY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF AU, BAC H —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28982
28271
28181
17731
26531
37521
28581
28961
28121
24761

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19023284 MEMORY DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF Macronix International Co., Ltd. HEISTERKAMP, JUSTIN BRYCE 2827 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 16, 2025
18888157 3D MEMORY DEVICE Macronix International Co., Ltd. SIPLING, KENNETH MARK 2818 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 18, 2024
18827659 Data-knowledge-driven Approach for Optimal Control of Wastewater Treatment Processes BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY DRODGE, JOSEPH W 1773 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 06, 2024
18812799 METHOD FOR EVALUATING LANGUAGE MODEL AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE Pegatron Corporation HASSAN, ALI MOHAMAD 2653 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 22, 2024
18776151 ATOMIZATION DEVICE Pegatron Corporation HO, ANNA THI 3752 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 17, 2024
18671986 THREE-DIMENSIONAL ULTRASONIC SEISMIC MODEL REAL-TIME IMAGING SYSTEM AND METHOD Institute Of Acoustics, Chinese Academy Of Sciences Sciences LEE, SANGKYUNG 2858 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 22, 2024
18671241 SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE Macronix International Co., Ltd. LUKE, DANIEL M 2896 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 22, 2024
18642831 MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME Macronix International Co., Ltd. TRAN, TIEN 2812 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 23, 2024
18617884 MULTI-NODE SERVER NETWORK SYSTEM Asrock Rack Incorporation SLOMS, NICHOLAS 2476 §103 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Mar 27, 2024
18608932 3D MEMORY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF Macronix International Co., Ltd. AU, BAC H 2898 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 19, 2024
18471292 CAPACITOR STRUCTURE Macronix International Co., Ltd. AHMAD, KHAJA 2813 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 21, 2023
18466820 MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD OF FORMING THE SAME Macronix International Co., Ltd. NIELSEN, DEREK LANG 2899 §103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Sep 14, 2023
18465451 ROUTING LAYOUT DESIGN DEVICE AND ROUTING LAYOUT DESIGN METHOD Pegatron Corporation PARIHAR, SUCHIN 2851 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 12, 2023
18464262 MULTI-CIRCUIT CONTROL SYSTEM AND READING METHOD FOR STATUS INFORMATION THEREOF Macronix International Co., Ltd. NGUYEN, VAN THU T 2824 §112 Non-Final OA 5d Pending Sep 11, 2023
18312207 SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME Macronix International Co., Ltd. MOVVA, AMAR 2898 §112 Non-Final OA 7d Pending May 04, 2023
18136812 DYNAMIC MULTI-OBJECTIVE PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION-BASED OPTIMAL CONTROL METHOD FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESS BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY GIRI, PURSOTTAM 2186 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 19, 2023
18177138 MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME Macronix International Co., Ltd. RONO, VINCENT KIPKEMOI 2891 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 02, 2023
18164623 SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE FOR 3D MEMORY AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF Macronix International Co., Ltd. SALAZ, SAMMANTHA KATELYN 2892 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 06, 2023
17684380 RECHARGEABLE BATTERY ENDURANCE ENHANCING DEVICE Chyurn Shan International Co., Ltd. LEE, JOHN 1794 §103§112 Final Rejection 107d overdue Pending Mar 01, 2022

Managing J.C. Patents's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is J.C. Patents's patent allowance rate?

83.3% of resolved applications prosecuted by J.C. Patents were allowed, across 6,031 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does J.C. Patents average before allowance?

2.67 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does J.C. Patents have?

19 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 6 clients, before 19 examiners in 18 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month