Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Leveque Intellectual Property Law, P.C.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security

7 pending office actions • 3 clients • 7 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Leveque Intellectual Property Law, P.C. manages a portfolio in Networking & Security with 604 career applications. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 92.09 percent for applications that reach a final resolution. Achieving these results involves an average of 2.68 office actions per allowance. Currently, the firm has 8 pending office actions to address.

The 604 career applications and 92.09 percent allowance rate reflect the firm's practice in its primary technology area. The 2.68 average office actions per allowance provides a benchmark for expected examiner interaction during the patent acquisition process. These figures offer a data-grounded view of the firm's historical performance and current workload for practitioners evaluating the firm's Networking & Security experience.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=604 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

92.1%
Allowance Rate
n=604
+0.48σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=604
2.7
OAs to Allowance
n=431
-0.29σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=431
934 days
Time to Allowance
n=431
+3.7pp
Interview Lift
n=604
21.2%
RCE Rate
n=604
2.6%
Appeal Rate
n=604

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

75.4%
§101 Overcome
n=69
85.6%
§102 Overcome
n=173
83.9%
§103 Overcome
n=261
87.6%
§112 Overcome
n=137

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, G06N
Top CPC Subclasses
37%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=604
1
Practitioners
n=604
604.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=604

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (71%)
2
Medium (29%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (43%)
§103 only2 (29%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (29%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
4
Information Tech
57% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
3
Business / Other
43% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GIROUARD, JANICE MARIE 1 74.3% +13.4%
ZAMAN, FAISAL M 1 67.2% +13.5%
HUARACHA, WILLY W 1 73.3% +54.4%
AHSAN, SYED M 1 73.1% +22.3%
GILLESPIE, NICOLE KATHLEEN 1 54.5% +50.3%
RUTTEN, JAMES D 1 63.3% +37.7%
RAMESH, TIRUMALE K 1 26.5% +23.7%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17751089 Automated Selection of Neural Architecture Using a Smoothed Super-Net RAMESH, TIRUMALE K 16d overdue
19244187 WRITE BURST GATHERING ACROSS MULTIPLE STREAMS GIROUARD, JANICE MARIE —
18782668 COMPUTATION ON A DATA STREAM HUARACHA, WILLY W —
18623565 PREVENTION OF ATTACKS VIA REQUESTED DISPLAYABLE CONTENT AHSAN, SYED M —
18390497 Apparatus and Methods for Cellular Compositions GILLESPIE, NICOLE KATHLEEN —
18523411 ACTIVITY PLANNER RUTTEN, JAMES D —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17751089 Automated Selection of Neural Architecture Using a Smoothed Super-Net RAMESH, TIRUMALE K 16d overdue
19244187 WRITE BURST GATHERING ACROSS MULTIPLE STREAMS GIROUARD, JANICE MARIE —
18888415 LOGIC RETENTION SUPPORT IN A DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM ZAMAN, FAISAL M —
18782668 COMPUTATION ON A DATA STREAM HUARACHA, WILLY W —
18623565 PREVENTION OF ATTACKS VIA REQUESTED DISPLAYABLE CONTENT AHSAN, SYED M —
18390497 Apparatus and Methods for Cellular Compositions GILLESPIE, NICOLE KATHLEEN —
18523411 ACTIVITY PLANNER RUTTEN, JAMES D —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
SoftBank 5
University of South Florida 1
Lifescore Limited 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
21381
21751
24911
21211

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19244187 WRITE BURST GATHERING ACROSS MULTIPLE STREAMS Arm Limited GIROUARD, JANICE MARIE 2138 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 20, 2025
18888415 LOGIC RETENTION SUPPORT IN A DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM Arm Limited ZAMAN, FAISAL M 2175 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 18, 2024
18782668 COMPUTATION ON A DATA STREAM Arm Limited HUARACHA, WILLY W §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 24, 2024
18623565 PREVENTION OF ATTACKS VIA REQUESTED DISPLAYABLE CONTENT UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA AHSAN, SYED M 2491 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 01, 2024
18390497 Apparatus and Methods for Cellular Compositions Lifescore Limited GILLESPIE, NICOLE KATHLEEN §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 20, 2023
18523411 ACTIVITY PLANNER Arm Limited RUTTEN, JAMES D §101§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 29, 2023
17751089 Automated Selection of Neural Architecture Using a Smoothed Super-Net Arm Limited RAMESH, TIRUMALE K 2121 §103 Final Rejection 16d overdue Pending May 23, 2022

Managing Leveque Intellectual Property Law, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month