Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Nlight-Wiley

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

6 pending office actions • 1 client • 5 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 18 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

nLIGHT-Wiley operates in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The firm has managed 222 career applications and currently oversees 4 pending office actions. These figures indicate the firm's historical experience and its current level of engagement with the USPTO. This data provides a baseline for understanding the firm's presence in this sector.

The firm's resolved allowance rate is 99.43. On average, the firm receives 3.9 office actions per allowance. Practitioners can use this average to estimate the frequency of examiner interactions required to reach a grant for applications in this portfolio. These metrics offer an overview of the firm's prosecution results.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=222 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

99.4%
Allowance Rate
n=222
+0.68σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=222
3.9
OAs to Allowance
n=175
+0.39σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=175
1053 days
Time to Allowance
n=175
+1.1pp
Interview Lift
n=222
35.8%
RCE Rate
n=222
0.9%
Appeal Rate
n=222

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=5 (min 20)
92.0%
§102 Overcome
n=87
91.2%
§103 Overcome
n=147
87.9%
§112 Overcome
n=66

Specialization & Scale

H01S, G02B, B23K
Top CPC Subclasses
61%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=222
0
Practitioners
n=222
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=222 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (33%)
4
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (33%)
Double-patenting + other2 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
4
Semiconductors
67% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHU, CHRIS H 2 53.2% +9.4%
AZAD, MD ABUL K 1 81.5% +20.9%
LEPISTO, RYAN A 1 87.7% +7.8%
JORDAN, ANDREW 1 44.2% +17.1%
EHRLICH, ALEXANDER JOSEPH 1 69.8% +47.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18807712 SCANNER CALIBRATION FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING AZAD, MD ABUL K —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17759719 MULTI-BAND PUMPING OF DOPED FIBER SOURCES EHRLICH, ALEXANDER JOSEPH 5d
18696775 SELECTABLE GAUSSIAN AND RING BEAM CHARACTERISTICS LEPISTO, RYAN A —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17759719 MULTI-BAND PUMPING OF DOPED FIBER SOURCES EHRLICH, ALEXANDER JOSEPH 5d
18807712 SCANNER CALIBRATION FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING AZAD, MD ABUL K —
18222949 DUAL-SIDED OPTICAL PACKAGE JORDAN, ANDREW —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
NLIGHT, INC. 6

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28742
28821
28281

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18807712 SCANNER CALIBRATION FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING Nlight, Inc. AZAD, MD ABUL K §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 16, 2024
18671882 ALL FIBER ADJUSTABLE BEAM SHAPING Nlight, Inc. CHU, CHRIS H 2874 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending May 22, 2024
18671923 ALL FIBER ADJUSTABLE BEAM SHAPING Nlight, Inc. CHU, CHRIS H §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending May 22, 2024
18696775 SELECTABLE GAUSSIAN AND RING BEAM CHARACTERISTICS Nlight, Inc. LEPISTO, RYAN A 2882 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 28, 2024
18222949 DUAL-SIDED OPTICAL PACKAGE Nlight, Inc. JORDAN, ANDREW 2874 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 17, 2023
17759719 MULTI-BAND PUMPING OF DOPED FIBER SOURCES Nlight, Inc. EHRLICH, ALEXANDER JOSEPH 2828 §103§112 Non-Final OA 5d Pending Jul 28, 2022

Managing Nlight-Wiley's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month