Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Rauschenbach Patent Law Group, Pllc

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

11 pending office actions • 6 clients • 11 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Rauschenbach Patent Law Group, PLLC focuses on Chemistry & Materials and has 11 pending office actions. The firm reports 441 career applications, a resolved allowance rate of 93.95%, and an average of 2.64 office actions per allowance.

The allowance rate indicates that most resolved applications reached allowance. The office-action average shows that allowed matters generally required more than two examination actions, pairing a high reported allowance outcome with recurring prosecution effort.

The active docket is limited relative to the reported career application volume. Practitioners can use the figures to frame expectations for chemistry and materials work, particularly the need to evaluate both historical allowance results and the response burden reflected in the portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=441 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

94.0%
Allowance Rate
n=441
+0.68σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=441
2.6
OAs to Allowance
n=233
-0.38σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=233
1098 days
Time to Allowance
n=233
-4.1pp
Interview Lift
n=441
21.8%
RCE Rate
n=441
0.5%
Appeal Rate
n=441

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=9 (min 20)
90.1%
§102 Overcome
n=71
86.7%
§103 Overcome
n=158
85.0%
§112 Overcome
n=93

Specialization & Scale

H01J, G02B, H04B
Top CPC Subclasses
23%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=441
0
Practitioners
n=441
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=441 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

5
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (5)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (36%)
5
Medium (45%)
1
Easy (9%)
1
Unknown (9%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only5 (45%)
§112 only1 (9%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (36%)
No statute on record1 (9%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
27% of docket
3
Information Tech
27% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
18% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
27% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GYLLSTROM, BRYON T 1 67.8% +7.5%
CHANG, HANWAY 1 86.2% +7.7%
ZAIDI, IQBAL 1 90.4% +6.8%
KNOX, KALERIA 1 68.3% +25.0%
MALIKASIM, JONATHAN L 1 80.5% +0.0%
SONG, MATTHEW J 1 60.4% +13.9%
MAK, RODRICK 1 75.6% +26.1%
BOWMAN, ANDREW J 1 65.8% +13.5%
WERNER, DAVID N 1 68.4% +16.1%
BENNETT, CHARLEE 1 58.8% +35.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18907966 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DISTRIBUTED NETWORK PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ZAIDI, IQBAL —

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17687652 LiDAR System with Active Fault Monitoring NOEL, JEMPSON 43d overdue
19224646 Deglaring Films for Illumination Systems GYLLSTROM, BRYON T 69d
18764268 Adaptive Multiple-Pulse LIDAR System KNOX, KALERIA —
18619069 Extrinsic LiDAR Calibration MALIKASIM, JONATHAN L —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17717679 Rotating Disk Reactor with Split Substrate Carrier BENNETT, CHARLEE 77d overdue
18412905 Method of Growing Personalized Single Crystal Diamond SONG, MATTHEW J 71d overdue
18328726 Multiple Chamber System for Plasma Chemical Vapor Deposition of Diamond and Related Materials BOWMAN, ANDREW J 70d overdue
18167847 System and Method for Solid-State LiDAR with Adaptive Blooming Correction WERNER, DAVID N 46d overdue
18764268 Adaptive Multiple-Pulse LIDAR System KNOX, KALERIA —
18333298 System and Method for Determining Wireless Service Quality using Inference MAK, RODRICK —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36453
28751
28781
24641
17141
24161
17171
24871
17181

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19224646 Deglaring Films for Illumination Systems Brightview Technologies, Inc. GYLLSTROM, BRYON T 2875 §102§103 Non-Final OA 69d Pending May 30, 2025
18913599 All-Optical Laser-Driven Light Source with Electrodeless Ignition Energetiq Technology, Inc. CHANG, HANWAY 2878 Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 11, 2024
18907966 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DISTRIBUTED NETWORK PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT 7Signal, Inc. ZAIDI, IQBAL 2464 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 07, 2024
18764268 Adaptive Multiple-Pulse LIDAR System Opsys Tech Ltd. KNOX, KALERIA 3645 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 04, 2024
18619069 Extrinsic LiDAR Calibration Opsys Tech Ltd. MALIKASIM, JONATHAN L 3645 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 27, 2024
18412905 Method of Growing Personalized Single Crystal Diamond Plasmability, LLC SONG, MATTHEW J 1714 §103 Non-Final OA 71d overdue Pending Jan 15, 2024
18333298 System and Method for Determining Wireless Service Quality using Inference 7Signal, Inc. MAK, RODRICK 2416 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 12, 2023
18328726 Multiple Chamber System for Plasma Chemical Vapor Deposition of Diamond and Related Materials Plasmability, Llc. BOWMAN, ANDREW J 1717 §112 Non-Final OA 70d overdue Pending Jun 03, 2023
18167847 System and Method for Solid-State LiDAR with Adaptive Blooming Correction Opsys Tech Ltd. WERNER, DAVID N 2487 §103 Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Feb 11, 2023
17717679 Rotating Disk Reactor with Split Substrate Carrier VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC. BENNETT, CHARLEE 1718 §103 Final Rejection 77d overdue Pending Apr 11, 2022
17687652 LiDAR System with Active Fault Monitoring Opsys Tech Ltd. NOEL, JEMPSON 3645 §103§112 Non-Final OA 43d overdue Pending Mar 06, 2022

Managing Rauschenbach Patent Law Group, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Rauschenbach Patent Law Group, Pllc's patent allowance rate?

94.0% of resolved applications prosecuted by Rauschenbach Patent Law Group, Pllc were allowed, across 441 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Rauschenbach Patent Law Group, Pllc average before allowance?

2.64 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Rauschenbach Patent Law Group, Pllc have?

11 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 6 clients, before 11 examiners in 9 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month