Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Schroeder Intellectual Property Law Group, LLC

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

8 pending office actions • 4 clients • 6 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

SCHROEDER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP, LLC has a career total of 269 applications, primarily in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The firm has a resolved allowance rate of 81.63 percent. Prosecution at the firm is notably intensive, averaging 4.99 office actions per allowance, which is a high figure for these technology areas. This average indicates a very persistent approach to overcoming examiner rejections through extensive negotiation.

Currently, the firm has 7 pending office actions. This small number of active matters is part of its 269 career applications. The 81.63 percent allowance rate shows a reliable success rate for its clients. However, the 4.99 office actions per allowance indicates a much longer and more involved prosecution path than typical, suggesting that the firm is committed to exhaustive efforts to secure patent grants. This data provides a clear expectation for applicants regarding the significant effort and time that may be required to achieve an allowance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=269 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

81.6%
Allowance Rate
n=269
+0.50σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=269
5.0
OAs to Allowance
n=200
+0.74σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=200
1208 days
Time to Allowance
n=200
+16.2pp
Interview Lift
n=269
45.3%
RCE Rate
n=269
2.5%
Appeal Rate
n=269

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=4 (min 20)
78.6%
§102 Overcome
n=131
81.5%
§103 Overcome
n=184
83.2%
§112 Overcome
n=149

Specialization & Scale

B05B, E06B, B65G
Top CPC Subclasses
19%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=269
1
Practitioners
n=269
269.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=269

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (38%)
5
Medium (62%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (50%)
Double-patenting + other1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (38%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
25% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
62% of docket
1
Business / Other
12% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HANES JR., JOHN 3 47.6% +38.8%
CAMPBELL, KEITH 1 89.7% +0.9%
SHABLACK, JOHNNIE A 1 65.4% +34.2%
SAMUELS, LAWRENCE H 1 56.3% +37.7%
CORALLO, CATRIONA MARY 1 67.0% +12.9%
EMPIE, NATHAN H 1 43.5% +43.1%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18404250 DOOR ASSEMBLY HAVING A SOFT BOTTOMED DOOR PANEL AND SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME HANES JR., JOHN 19d
18994788 CONVEYING DEVICE FOR CONVEYING MATERIAL CAMPBELL, KEITH —
18404284 DOOR ASSEMBLY HAVING A SOFT BOTTOMED DOOR PANEL AND SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME HANES JR., JOHN —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18404250 DOOR ASSEMBLY HAVING A SOFT BOTTOMED DOOR PANEL AND SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME HANES JR., JOHN 19d
16247001 TREATMENT INSTALLATION AND METHOD FOR TREATING WORKPIECES EMPIE, NATHAN H 22d
18404319 DOOR ASSEMBLY HAVING A SOFT BOTTOMED DOOR PANEL AND SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME HANES JR., JOHN 26d
18738152 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SAFETY MANAGEMENT IN ROLL-UP DOORS SHABLACK, JOHNNIE A —
18404284 DOOR ASSEMBLY HAVING A SOFT BOTTOMED DOOR PANEL AND SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME HANES JR., JOHN —
17799718 ELECTRON BEAM SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR THE ADDITIVE MANUFACTURE OF A WORKPIECE SAMUELS, LAWRENCE H —
17764310 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING GRAPHITE AND VERTICAL GRAPHITIZATION FURNACE CORALLO, CATRIONA MARY —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36344
37611
17321
17121

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18994788 CONVEYING DEVICE FOR CONVEYING MATERIAL Onejoon GmbH CAMPBELL, KEITH §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 15, 2025
18738152 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SAFETY MANAGEMENT IN ROLL-UP DOORS Rytec Corporation SHABLACK, JOHNNIE A 3634 §103DP Final Rejection — Pending Jun 10, 2024
18404284 DOOR ASSEMBLY HAVING A SOFT BOTTOMED DOOR PANEL AND SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME Rytec Corporation HANES JR., JOHN 3634 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 04, 2024
18404250 DOOR ASSEMBLY HAVING A SOFT BOTTOMED DOOR PANEL AND SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME Rytec Corporation HANES JR., JOHN 3634 §102§103 Final Rejection 19d Pending Jan 04, 2024
18404319 DOOR ASSEMBLY HAVING A SOFT BOTTOMED DOOR PANEL AND SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME Rytec Corporation HANES JR., JOHN 3634 §103 Final Rejection 26d Pending Jan 04, 2024
17799718 ELECTRON BEAM SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR THE ADDITIVE MANUFACTURE OF A WORKPIECE Pro-Beam GmbH & Co. Kgaa SAMUELS, LAWRENCE H 3761 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 15, 2022
17764310 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING GRAPHITE AND VERTICAL GRAPHITIZATION FURNACE Onejoon GmbH CORALLO, CATRIONA MARY 1732 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 28, 2022
16247001 TREATMENT INSTALLATION AND METHOD FOR TREATING WORKPIECES Eisenmann SE EMPIE, NATHAN H 1712 §103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Jan 14, 2019

Managing Schroeder Intellectual Property Law Group, LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month