Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
10 pending office actions • 5 art units • 10 examiners • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 40 patents granted in the last 365 days
PEGATRON Corporation is currently navigating 14 pending office actions within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These matters are distributed among 14 distinct examiners. This dispersion requires the applicant to adapt to many individual examiner preferences simultaneously as each case is handled by a different person.
The prosecution effort is concentrated within 6 distinct art units. BACK, AUSTIN M is the busiest examiner but only manages 1 pending office action. This distribution across the examiners means that no single individual's tendencies will disproportionately impact the overall success of the pending portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (10%) |
| §103 only | 3 (30%) |
| §102 only | 3 (30%) |
| §112 only | 1 (10%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BACK, AUSTIN M | 1 | 78.7% | +24.2% |
| EDWARDS, ANTHONY Q | 1 | 84.5% | +14.7% |
| WILLIAMS, JOSEPH L | 1 | 82.8% | +15.2% |
| HASSAN, ALI MOHAMAD | 1 | 68.8% | +37.5% |
| HO, ANNA THI | 1 | 40.0% | +33.9% |
| BOUIZZA, MICHAEL M | 1 | 81.6% | +13.6% |
| TARDIF, DAVID P | 1 | 72.0% | +10.3% |
| PARIHAR, SUCHIN | 1 | 87.8% | +8.9% |
| CRUM, GAGE STEPHEN | 1 | 56.9% | +30.1% |
| KOHUTKA, BROOKE NICOLE | 1 | 37.5% | +92.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18762177 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE | BOUIZZA, MICHAEL M | 40d |
| 18970935 | SERVER CHASSIS | EDWARDS, ANTHONY Q | — |
| 18928488 | DISPLAY STRUCTURE | WILLIAMS, JOSEPH L | — |
| 18465451 | ROUTING LAYOUT DESIGN DEVICE AND ROUTING LAYOUT DESIGN METHOD | PARIHAR, SUCHIN | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18324772 | CHASSIS FOR INSTALLING MULTIPLE COMPUTING ELEMENTS | CRUM, GAGE STEPHEN | 6d |
| 18812799 | METHOD FOR EVALUATING LANGUAGE MODEL AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | HASSAN, ALI MOHAMAD | — |
| 18191077 | INTELLIGENT BED AND INTELLIGENT MONITORING SYSTEM USING SAME | KOHUTKA, BROOKE NICOLE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18324772 | CHASSIS FOR INSTALLING MULTIPLE COMPUTING ELEMENTS | CRUM, GAGE STEPHEN | 6d |
| 18762177 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE | BOUIZZA, MICHAEL M | 40d |
| 19176041 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE | BACK, AUSTIN M | — |
| 18970935 | SERVER CHASSIS | EDWARDS, ANTHONY Q | — |
| 18928488 | DISPLAY STRUCTURE | WILLIAMS, JOSEPH L | — |
| 18812799 | METHOD FOR EVALUATING LANGUAGE MODEL AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | HASSAN, ALI MOHAMAD | — |
| 18776151 | ATOMIZATION DEVICE | HO, ANNA THI | — |
| 18408168 | CHARGING SOCKET FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE | TARDIF, DAVID P | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2845 | 2 |
| 2841 | 2 |
| 2653 | 1 |
| 3752 | 1 |
| 3791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19176041 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE | BACK, AUSTIN M | 2845 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 10, 2025 |
| 18970935 | SERVER CHASSIS | EDWARDS, ANTHONY Q | 2841 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 06, 2024 |
| 18928488 | DISPLAY STRUCTURE | WILLIAMS, JOSEPH L | — | §102Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 28, 2024 |
| 18812799 | METHOD FOR EVALUATING LANGUAGE MODEL AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | HASSAN, ALI MOHAMAD | 2653 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 22, 2024 |
| 18776151 | ATOMIZATION DEVICE | HO, ANNA THI | 3752 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 17, 2024 |
| 18762177 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE | BOUIZZA, MICHAEL M | 2845 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 40d | Pending | Jul 02, 2024 |
| 18408168 | CHARGING SOCKET FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE | TARDIF, DAVID P | — | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 09, 2024 |
| 18465451 | ROUTING LAYOUT DESIGN DEVICE AND ROUTING LAYOUT DESIGN METHOD | PARIHAR, SUCHIN | — | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 12, 2023 |
| 18324772 | CHASSIS FOR INSTALLING MULTIPLE COMPUTING ELEMENTS | CRUM, GAGE STEPHEN | 2841 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 6d | Pending | May 26, 2023 |
| 18191077 | INTELLIGENT BED AND INTELLIGENT MONITORING SYSTEM USING SAME | KOHUTKA, BROOKE NICOLE | 3791 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 28, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial