Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Terawatt Technology K K

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

14 pending office actions • 7 art units • 14 examiners • 0 of 14 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Terawatt Technology K K is managing a significant workload of 15 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This portfolio is highly distributed, involving 15 distinct examiners and 7 distinct art units. Such a broad distribution suggests that the company's innovations span a wide variety of specialized chemical and material sub-sectors.

The busiest examiner, PARK, LISA S, is responsible for only 1 pending office action. This indicates that no single examiner has a dominant influence over the portfolio, as every pending case is handled by a different official. With 7 distinct art units involved, the company must navigate a complex array of examination standards and technical expertise. This decentralized structure requires a versatile prosecution strategy that can adapt to many different examiner preferences simultaneously. The high number of 15 distinct examiners relative to the 15 pending office actions highlights a total lack of examiner concentration. Practitioners must be prepared for highly individualized prosecution paths for every application in the current workload.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

14
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (36%)
9
Medium (64%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only9 (64%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (36%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

7
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
7% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
6
Business / Other
43% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

140 h
Manual time on pending OAs
28 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
49 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PARK, LISA S 1 77.4% +22.3%
BROWN, MADISON ELIZABETH 1 — —
WALLS-MURRAY, JESSIE LOGAN 1 74.5% +25.8%
MAYES, MELVIN C 1 34.1% +5.2%
WANG, EUGENIA 1 54.4% +34.8%
RUSERE, LINAH NATSAI 1 — —
LYNCH, VICTORIA HOM 1 86.2% +10.0%
CARVALHO JR., ARMINDO 1 50.3% +29.0%
SUN, MICHAEL Y 1 57.1% +26.5%
WILLIAMS, ARUN C 1 82.0% +16.4%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18337696 BATTERY SYSTEM, CHARGING DEVICE, AND CHARGING METHOD WILLIAMS, ARUN C —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18616446 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY PARK, LISA S —
18596152 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY WALLS-MURRAY, JESSIE LOGAN —
18543156 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY MAYES, MELVIN C —
18522833 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY WANG, EUGENIA —
18480013 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY LYNCH, VICTORIA HOM —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18616446 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY PARK, LISA S —
18596152 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY WALLS-MURRAY, JESSIE LOGAN —
18522833 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY WANG, EUGENIA —
18480013 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY LYNCH, VICTORIA HOM —
18358182 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME CARVALHO JR., ARMINDO —
18342205 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY SUN, MICHAEL Y —
18337696 BATTERY SYSTEM, CHARGING DEVICE, AND CHARGING METHOD WILLIAMS, ARUN C —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1729 2
1724 1
1728 1
2859 1
1723 1
1725 1
1722 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18616446 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY PARK, LISA S — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 26, 2024
18601657 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY BROWN, MADISON ELIZABETH — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 11, 2024
18596152 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY WALLS-MURRAY, JESSIE LOGAN — §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 05, 2024
18543156 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY MAYES, MELVIN C — §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 18, 2023
18522833 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY WANG, EUGENIA — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 29, 2023
18507206 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, METHOD FOR USING SAME, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY RUSERE, LINAH NATSAI — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 13, 2023
18480013 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY LYNCH, VICTORIA HOM 1724 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 03, 2023
18358182 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME CARVALHO JR., ARMINDO 1729 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 25, 2023
18342205 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY SUN, MICHAEL Y 1728 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 27, 2023
18337696 BATTERY SYSTEM, CHARGING DEVICE, AND CHARGING METHOD WILLIAMS, ARUN C 2859 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 20, 2023
18196291 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY BILLIET, AMANDA JUNE 1729 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 11, 2023
18136125 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY MARROQUIN, DOUGLAS C 1723 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 18, 2023
18111339 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY APPLEGATE, SARAH ARIMINTIA 1725 §103 Final Rejection 23d Pending Feb 17, 2023
18111337 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY EOFF, ANCA 1722 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 17, 2023

Managing Terawatt Technology K K's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month