Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026

Terawatt Technology K K

16 pending office actions • 8 art units • 16 examiners • 0 of 16 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

16
Total Pending OAs
10
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (44%)
9
Medium (56%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (12%)
§103 only9 (56%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (31%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

11
Life Sciences
69% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
6% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
4
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

160 h
Manual time on pending OAs
32 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
56 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WALLS-MURRAY, JESSIE LOGAN 1 74.3% +25.6%
MARINI, MATTHEW G 1 60.4% +21.7%
MAYES, MELVIN C 1 33.6% +5.2%
WANG, EUGENIA 1 54.4% +34.9%
MCCONNELL, WYATT P 1 80.6% +9.4%
SUN, MICHAEL Y 1 57.0% +27.1%
BILLIET, AMANDA JUNE 1
MARROQUIN, DOUGLAS C 1 45.8% +78.6%
AMPONSAH, OSEI K 1 72.3% +33.2%
WEINER, LAURA S 1 85.2% +14.3%

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18365348 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY MCCONNELL, WYATT P 3d overdue
18118948 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY WEINER, LAURA S 2d overdue
18596152 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY WALLS-MURRAY, JESSIE LOGAN
18591347 DETERIORATION STATE ESTIMATION DEVICE, DETERIORATION STATE ESTIMATION METHOD, AND PROGRAM MARINI, MATTHEW G
18543156 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY MAYES, MELVIN C
18522833 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY WANG, EUGENIA
18108313 INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM BACA, MATTHEW WALTER

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18118948 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY WEINER, LAURA S 2d overdue
18596152 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY WALLS-MURRAY, JESSIE LOGAN
18591347 DETERIORATION STATE ESTIMATION DEVICE, DETERIORATION STATE ESTIMATION METHOD, AND PROGRAM MARINI, MATTHEW G
18522833 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY WANG, EUGENIA
18342205 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY SUN, MICHAEL Y
18136125 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY MARROQUIN, DOUGLAS C
18119000 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY AMPONSAH, OSEI K

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1728 2
1723 2
1725 2
1722 2
1727 1
1729 1
1752 1
2857 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18596152 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY WALLS-MURRAY, JESSIE LOGAN §102§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Mar 05, 2024
18591347 DETERIORATION STATE ESTIMATION DEVICE, DETERIORATION STATE ESTIMATION METHOD, AND PROGRAM MARINI, MATTHEW G §101§102§112 Non-Final OA Pending Feb 29, 2024
18543156 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY MAYES, MELVIN C §102§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 18, 2023
18522833 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY WANG, EUGENIA §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Nov 29, 2023
18365348 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY MCCONNELL, WYATT P 1727 §103§112 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Aug 04, 2023
18342205 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY SUN, MICHAEL Y 1728 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jun 27, 2023
18196291 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY BILLIET, AMANDA JUNE 1729 §103 Final Rejection Pending May 11, 2023
18136125 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY MARROQUIN, DOUGLAS C 1723 §103 Final Rejection Pending Apr 18, 2023
18119000 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY AMPONSAH, OSEI K 1752 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Mar 08, 2023
18118948 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY WEINER, LAURA S 1723 §103§112 Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending Mar 08, 2023
18111339 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY APPLEGATE, SARAH ARIMINTIA 1725 §103 Final Rejection 23d Pending Feb 17, 2023
18111337 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY EOFF, ANCA 1722 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Feb 17, 2023
18108313 INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM BACA, MATTHEW WALTER 2857 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Feb 10, 2023
18087161 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY AND METHOD FOR USING SAME VAN KIRK, DUSTIN KENWOOD 1722 §103 Non-Final OA 31d overdue Pending Dec 22, 2022
17982837 SECONDARY BATTERY RAMOS RIVERA, GILBERTO 1725 §103 Non-Final OA 77d Pending Nov 08, 2022
17953398 SOLID STATE BATTERY SONG, KEVIN 1728 §103 Final Rejection Pending Sep 27, 2022

Managing Terawatt Technology K K's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month