Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
6 pending office actions • 5 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 5 (83%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (17%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCCONNELL, WYATT P | 1 | 80.5% | +9.4% |
| GOULD, ANNA ELIZABETH | 1 | 41.2% | +55.0% |
| WEINER, LAURA S | 1 | 85.3% | +13.6% |
| APPLEGATE, SARAH ARIMINTIA | 1 | 62.5% | +42.9% |
| HERNANDEZ, MANUEL J | 1 | 50.8% | +44.5% |
| RAMOS RIVERA, GILBERTO | 1 | 70.6% | +38.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18365348 | LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY | MCCONNELL, WYATT P | 3d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18118948 | LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY | WEINER, LAURA S | 2d overdue |
| 18111339 | LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY | APPLEGATE, SARAH ARIMINTIA | 23d |
| 18127948 | LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, AND ANODE FREE BATTERY | GOULD, ANNA ELIZABETH | 47d |
| 18085816 | BATTERY SYSTEM, CONTROL DEVICE, AND CONTROL METHOD | HERNANDEZ, MANUEL J | 55d |
| 17982837 | SECONDARY BATTERY | RAMOS RIVERA, GILBERTO | 77d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1725 | 2 |
| 1727 | 1 |
| 1726 | 1 |
| 1723 | 1 |
| 2859 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18365348 | LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY | MCCONNELL, WYATT P | 1727 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 3d overdue | Pending | Aug 04, 2023 |
| 18127948 | LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, AND ANODE FREE BATTERY | GOULD, ANNA ELIZABETH | 1726 | §103 | Final Rejection | 47d | Pending | Mar 29, 2023 |
| 18118948 | LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY | WEINER, LAURA S | 1723 | Other | Non-Final OA | 2d overdue | Pending | Mar 08, 2023 |
| 18111339 | LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY | APPLEGATE, SARAH ARIMINTIA | 1725 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 23d | Pending | Feb 17, 2023 |
| 18085816 | BATTERY SYSTEM, CONTROL DEVICE, AND CONTROL METHOD | HERNANDEZ, MANUEL J | 2859 | §103 | Final Rejection | 55d | Pending | Dec 21, 2022 |
| 17982837 | SECONDARY BATTERY | RAMOS RIVERA, GILBERTO | 1725 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 77d | Pending | Nov 08, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial