Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Avyno Law P.C.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 3 clients • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Avyno Law P.C. operates in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering, with 550 career applications. The firm has a resolved allowance rate pct of 96.21. This rate is a key indicator of the firm's effectiveness in securing patent rights in these technical domains. The 96.21 percent allowance rate provides a baseline for the likelihood of success for its client base. Practitioners can use this percentage to evaluate the firm's historical performance across its career filings.

There are 5 pending office actions currently being handled. The firm's average of 2.13 office actions per allowance indicates the typical prosecution effort associated with the firm's work. This 2.13 average helps in setting expectations for the number of interactions required to reach a final decision. With 550 applications in its history, the firm has established a clear performance record. The 5 pending actions represent the current active workload for the firm's practitioners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=550 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

96.2%
Allowance Rate
n=550
+0.39σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=550
2.1
OAs to Allowance
n=432
-0.88σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=432
852 days
Time to Allowance
n=432
+1.2pp
Interview Lift
n=550
17.6%
RCE Rate
n=550
0.3%
Appeal Rate
n=550

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=18 (min 20)
83.5%
§102 Overcome
n=103
82.9%
§103 Overcome
n=140
91.0%
§112 Overcome
n=166

Specialization & Scale

Y02E, C10B, Y02P
Top CPC Subclasses
12%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=550
1
Practitioners
n=550
550.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=550

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
4
Medium (80%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (80%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
40% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FLORES, JUAN G 1 79.5% +14.5%
LANGEL, WAYNE A 1 78.4% +23.2%
AYALEW, TINSAE B 1 75.8% +9.1%
TREMARCHE, CONNOR J. 1 65.6% +27.7%
PINDERSKI, JACQUELINE M 1 26.9% +45.3%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18582455 Steamer AYALEW, TINSAE B —
17567289 Temperature-Controlled Massage Node PINDERSKI, JACQUELINE M —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17956747 Window Fan TREMARCHE, CONNOR J. 72d overdue
19239761 Fan FLORES, JUAN G 35d
18732435 CONTROL OF PYROLYSIS CONDITIONS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DESIRABLE COMPOUNDS LANGEL, WAYNE A —
17567289 Temperature-Controlled Massage Node PINDERSKI, JACQUELINE M —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37451
17361
17111
37621
37851

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19239761 Fan Vornado Air, LLC FLORES, JUAN G 3745 §103 Final Rejection 35d Pending Jun 16, 2025
18732435 CONTROL OF PYROLYSIS CONDITIONS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DESIRABLE COMPOUNDS Talipot Cool Extract (Ip), LLC LANGEL, WAYNE A 1736 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 03, 2024
18582455 Steamer Vornado Air, LLC AYALEW, TINSAE B 1711 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 20, 2024
17956747 Window Fan Vornado Air, LLC TREMARCHE, CONNOR J. 3762 §103 Non-Final OA 72d overdue Pending Sep 29, 2022
17567289 Temperature-Controlled Massage Node Merchsource, LLC PINDERSKI, JACQUELINE M 3785 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 03, 2022

Managing Avyno Law P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month