Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Central California Ip Group, P.C.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

10 pending office actions • 8 clients • 10 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

CENTRAL CALIFORNIA IP GROUP, P.C. has 11 pending office actions in Chemistry & Materials and 1882 career applications. The active docket sits within a substantial application record, providing context for evaluating both current examination work and longer-term activity in the technology area.

The resolved allowance rate is 84.65%, and the average is 2.97 office actions per allowance. These figures show the relationship between favorable resolved outcomes and the examination effort associated with them. Applicants can use the profile to assess whether the firm’s experience is relevant to portfolios that require repeated examiner interaction while maintaining a meaningful allowance rate.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1882 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

84.6%
Allowance Rate
n=1882
+0.41σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1882
3.0
OAs to Allowance
n=1368
-0.15σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1368
982 days
Time to Allowance
n=1368
+2.1pp
Interview Lift
n=1882
20.2%
RCE Rate
n=1882
1.6%
Appeal Rate
n=1882

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

88.5%
§101 Overcome
n=52
78.1%
§102 Overcome
n=576
79.4%
§103 Overcome
n=914
80.7%
§112 Overcome
n=514

Specialization & Scale

H01L, H10D, H10P
Top CPC Subclasses
33%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1882
0
Practitioners
n=1882
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=1882 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (50%)
4
Medium (40%)
1
Easy (10%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (40%)
§112 only1 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
50% of docket
1
Information Tech
10% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
20% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ZHAO, DON GORDON 1 87.3% +16.2%
FRY, PATRICK B 1 54.1% +8.2%
MOORE, KARLA A 1 43.1% +13.6%
CHEN, KEATH T 1 30.2% +24.7%
DEGRASSE, IAN ISAAC 1 81.5% +3.3%
CELESTINE, NYROBI I 1 81.4% +23.1%
QUIST, NICOLE LEE 1 89.7% +13.3%
MAI, ANH D 1 37.7% +9.6%
REYES, JOSHUA NATHANIEL PI 1 42.3% +50.5%
KUYKENDALL, ALYSSA LEE 1 18.5% +75.5%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18326077 INSULATED GATE BIPOLAR TRANSISTOR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SAME DEGRASSE, IAN ISAAC 26d
18555535 METHOD FOR TRACING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT BASED ON META-UNIVERSE ZHAO, DON GORDON 46d

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18928272 MEDICINE SUPPLY MODULE AND MEDICINE PACKING APPARATUS INCLUDING SAME FRY, PATRICK B 8d
18191296 LDMOS SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME MAI, ANH D 84d
17866690 DOUBLE-TUBE CONNECTION STRUCTURE FOR DETONATION SYNTHESIS, DETONATION SYNTHESIS DEVICE AND APPLICATION THEREOF KUYKENDALL, ALYSSA LEE 85d
18623190 DC PULSE PLASMA SUBSTRATE TREATMENT APPARATUS MOORE, KARLA A —
18251392 CONTACTLESS BREATHING OR HEARTBEAT DETECTION METHOD CELESTINE, NYROBI I —
18307141 THREE-WAY CATALYST HAVING LOW NH3 FORMATION AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR QUIST, NICOLE LEE —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18555535 METHOD FOR TRACING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT BASED ON META-UNIVERSE ZHAO, DON GORDON 46d
17866690 DOUBLE-TUBE CONNECTION STRUCTURE FOR DETONATION SYNTHESIS, DETONATION SYNTHESIS DEVICE AND APPLICATION THEREOF KUYKENDALL, ALYSSA LEE 85d
18623190 DC PULSE PLASMA SUBSTRATE TREATMENT APPARATUS MOORE, KARLA A —
18613512 PLASMA SUBSTRATE TREATMENT APPARATUS CHEN, KEATH T —
18251392 CONTACTLESS BREATHING OR HEARTBEAT DETECTION METHOD CELESTINE, NYROBI I —
18307141 THREE-WAY CATALYST HAVING LOW NH3 FORMATION AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR QUIST, NICOLE LEE —
18050155 SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS REYES, JOSHUA NATHANIEL PI —

Client Portfolio (8 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17162
24931
37311
28181
37981
17381
28931
17181
17741

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18555535 METHOD FOR TRACING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT BASED ON META-UNIVERSE Xihua University ZHAO, DON GORDON 2493 §112 Non-Final OA 46d Pending Nov 25, 2024
18928272 MEDICINE SUPPLY MODULE AND MEDICINE PACKING APPARATUS INCLUDING SAME Kisan Electronics Co., Ltd. FRY, PATRICK B 3731 §102§103 Final Rejection 8d Pending Oct 28, 2024
18623190 DC PULSE PLASMA SUBSTRATE TREATMENT APPARATUS Innovation For Creative Devices Co., Ltd. MOORE, KARLA A 1716 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 01, 2024
18613512 PLASMA SUBSTRATE TREATMENT APPARATUS Innovation For Creative Devices Co., Ltd. CHEN, KEATH T 1716 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 22, 2024
18326077 INSULATED GATE BIPOLAR TRANSISTOR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SAME Db Hitek Co., Ltd. DEGRASSE, IAN ISAAC 2818 §103 Final Rejection 26d Pending May 31, 2023
18251392 CONTACTLESS BREATHING OR HEARTBEAT DETECTION METHOD Pontosense Inc. CELESTINE, NYROBI I 3798 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 01, 2023
18307141 THREE-WAY CATALYST HAVING LOW NH3 FORMATION AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR Sinocat Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. QUIST, NICOLE LEE 1738 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 26, 2023
18191296 LDMOS SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME Db Hitek Co., Ltd. MAI, ANH D 2893 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 84d Pending Mar 28, 2023
18050155 SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS Jusung Engineering Co., Ltd. REYES, JOSHUA NATHANIEL PI 1718 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 27, 2022
17866690 DOUBLE-TUBE CONNECTION STRUCTURE FOR DETONATION SYNTHESIS, DETONATION SYNTHESIS DEVICE AND APPLICATION THEREOF Chengdu Infinite Singularity Technology Co., Ltd. KUYKENDALL, ALYSSA LEE 1774 §103 Final Rejection 85d Pending Jul 18, 2022

Managing Central California Ip Group, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Central California Ip Group, P.C.'s patent allowance rate?

84.7% of resolved applications prosecuted by Central California Ip Group, P.C. were allowed, across 1,882 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Central California Ip Group, P.C. average before allowance?

2.97 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Central California Ip Group, P.C. have?

10 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 8 clients, before 10 examiners in 9 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month