Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Dorton & Willis LLP

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

25 pending office actions • 10 clients • 24 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 25 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Dorton & Willis LLP is a patent law firm focused on Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. With 575 career applications, the firm maintains a specialized practice. It has achieved a resolved allowance rate of 88.27 percent, which reflects its ability to secure patent rights within its core technology area. This success rate provides a reliable benchmark for prospective clients in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. The firm's focused approach is evident in its application volume.

The firm currently has 20 pending office actions to resolve. Its prosecution history shows an average of 3.43 office actions per allowance. This figure provides a clear expectation for the typical duration and intensity of the examination process for applications handled by this firm. The combination of a high allowance rate and a focused application count suggests a targeted approach to patent prosecution. Practitioners can evaluate the firm's performance using these 575 career applications and the 3.43 average office actions per allowance. These metrics highlight the firm's operational consistency.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=575 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.3%
Allowance Rate
n=575
+0.53σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=575
3.4
OAs to Allowance
n=399
-0.08σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=399
1053 days
Time to Allowance
n=399
+9.8pp
Interview Lift
n=575
23.0%
RCE Rate
n=575
6.4%
Appeal Rate
n=575

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

70.4%
§101 Overcome
n=81
74.7%
§102 Overcome
n=229
78.0%
§103 Overcome
n=314
82.2%
§112 Overcome
n=258

Specialization & Scale

B25J, G05B, A61B
Top CPC Subclasses
34%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=575
2
Practitioners
n=575
287.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=575

Portfolio Summary

25
Total Pending OAs
21
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

6
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (6)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

17
Hard (68%)
7
Medium (28%)
1
Easy (4%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other7 (28%)
§103 only5 (20%)
§102 only1 (4%)
§112 only1 (4%)
Double-patenting + other1 (4%)
Multi-statute (no §101)10 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
4% of docket
1
Semiconductors
4% of docket
16
Mechanical / Eng
64% of docket
7
Business / Other
28% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

250 h
Manual time on pending OAs
50 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
88 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
2.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
EVANS, KARSTON G 2 69.4% +17.7%
PATEL, JAIMIN GHANSHYAM 1 94.1% +11.1%
STIEBRITZ, NOAH WILLIAM 1 66.7% -4.0%
RAMIREZ, ELLIS B 1 81.1% +14.9%
RANDAZZO, THOMAS 1 86.7% +12.3%
KIM, SANG K 1 81.4% +10.3%
BURRELL, KATELYNNE RUTH 1 56.5% -0.4%
O'MALLEY, JOHN MARTIN 1 56.3% +62.5%
CARDIMINO, CHRISTOPHER RYAN 1 57.7% +22.1%
TRAN, KHOI H 1 54.9% +16.9%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18938751 Goods Storage System and Method RANDAZZO, THOMAS —
18860899 Gripper for Handling SMD Component Reel Cassettes, and Associated SMD Component Reel Cassette KIM, SANG K —

Hard Cases (17)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18557717 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CARRYING OUT A ROBOT APPLICATION EVANS, KARSTON G 225d overdue
18316276 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL RECONSTRUCTION COFINO, JONATHAN M 105d overdue
18262055 PLANNING A PATH OF A DRIVERLESS MOBILE ROBOT MACIOROWSKI, GODFREY ALEKSANDER 31d overdue
18846903 Planning a Path of a Robot TRAN, KHOI H 16d overdue
18556755 GENERATING A ROBOT PROGRAM AND OPERATING A ROBOT MANCHO, RONNIE M 9d overdue
18558440 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING A TELEROBOTIC ROBOT WATTS III, JAMES MILLER 27d
19261125 Robot Path Planning EVANS, KARSTON G —
18988006 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED AS-SEMBLY OF COMPONENTS PATEL, JAIMIN GHANSHYAM —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18557717 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CARRYING OUT A ROBOT APPLICATION EVANS, KARSTON G 225d overdue
18846903 Planning a Path of a Robot TRAN, KHOI H 16d overdue
19261125 Robot Path Planning EVANS, KARSTON G —
18988006 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED AS-SEMBLY OF COMPONENTS PATEL, JAIMIN GHANSHYAM —
18875425 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR OPERATING A ROBOT RAMIREZ, ELLIS B —
18938751 Goods Storage System and Method RANDAZZO, THOMAS —
18860899 Gripper for Handling SMD Component Reel Cassettes, and Associated SMD Component Reel Cassette KIM, SANG K —
18848968 Robot Add-On Part, Control Device, Robot, and Associated Method O'MALLEY, JOHN MARTIN —

Client Portfolio (10 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36576
36583
36563
36541
36611
36671
26141
28461
37521

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19261125 Robot Path Planning Kuka Deutschland GmbH EVANS, KARSTON G 3657 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 07, 2025
18988006 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED AS-SEMBLY OF COMPONENTS Kuka Systems North America LLC PATEL, JAIMIN GHANSHYAM §102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 19, 2024
18876068 ROBOT ARM CALIBRATION Kuka Deutschland GmbH STIEBRITZ, NOAH WILLIAM 3658 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 17, 2024
18875425 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR OPERATING A ROBOT Kuka Deutschland GmbH RAMIREZ, ELLIS B 3658 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 16, 2024
18938751 Goods Storage System and Method Swisslog AG RANDAZZO, THOMAS §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 06, 2024
18860899 Gripper for Handling SMD Component Reel Cassettes, and Associated SMD Component Reel Cassette Kuka Deutschland GmbH KIM, SANG K §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 28, 2024
18860891 Method for Automatic Reloading of SMD Component Reels on SMD Assembly Machines Kuka Deutschland GmbH BURRELL, KATELYNNE RUTH 3654 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 28, 2024
18848968 Robot Add-On Part, Control Device, Robot, and Associated Method Kuka Deutschland GmbH O'MALLEY, JOHN MARTIN 3658 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 20, 2024
18847039 Ascertaining at Least One Border for Operating a Robot Kuka Systems GmbH CARDIMINO, CHRISTOPHER RYAN 3661 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 13, 2024
18846903 Planning a Path of a Robot Kuka Systems GmbH TRAN, KHOI H 3656 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 16d overdue Pending Sep 13, 2024
18847023 Checking a Predefined Path of a Robot Kuka Systems GmbH MOYER, DALE S 3656 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 13, 2024
18846878 Checking a Safety Configuration of a Robot Kuka Systems GmbH HANNAN, B M M 3657 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 13, 2024
18710460 METHOD, LASER-OPTICAL DETECTION SYSEM AND ROBOTIC WORKSTATION Kuka Deutschland GmbH SINGH, ESVINDER 3657 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 13, 2024
18719655 METHOD FOR ASSIGNNG AN EMERGENCY-STOP FUNCTIONALITY, AND AUTOMATION SYSTEM Kuka Deutschland GmbH CARTER, CHRISTOPHER W §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 13, 2024
18688686 NUT RETAINING DEVICE AND RELATED METHODS Jpb Système BATES, ZAKIYA W §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 01, 2024
18683017 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ANALYSING OPERATION OF A ROBOT Kuka Deutschland GmbH RAMIREZ BRAVO, BEATRIZ A §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 12, 2024
18419350 SYSTEM FOR TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT Knimble Designs, Inc. BOLES, SAMEH RAAFAT §101DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 22, 2024
18557717 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CARRYING OUT A ROBOT APPLICATION Kuka Aktiengesellschaft EVANS, KARSTON G 3657 §103§112 Final Rejection 225d overdue Pending Nov 09, 2023
18556755 GENERATING A ROBOT PROGRAM AND OPERATING A ROBOT Kuka Deutschland GmbH MANCHO, RONNIE M 3657 §103§112 Non-Final OA 9d overdue Pending Nov 02, 2023
18558440 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING A TELEROBOTIC ROBOT Kuka Deutschland GmbH WATTS III, JAMES MILLER 3657 §102§103 Non-Final OA 27d Pending Nov 01, 2023
18262055 PLANNING A PATH OF A DRIVERLESS MOBILE ROBOT Kuka Deutschland GmbH MACIOROWSKI, GODFREY ALEKSANDER 3667 §102§103 Final Rejection 31d overdue Pending Jul 19, 2023
18316276 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL RECONSTRUCTION Jointvue LLC COFINO, JONATHAN M 2614 §102§103 Non-Final OA 105d overdue Pending May 12, 2023
18308197 Drive System Renk GmbH CHAN, KAWING 2846 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 27, 2023
18043355 METHOD, DEVICE AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR DETERMINING THE POSITION OF A SPACECRAFT IN SPACE Jena-Optronik GmbH CULLEN, TANNER L 3656 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 28, 2023
17468092 FILTER Rig Deluge Global Limited LIEUWEN, CODY J 3752 §103 Non-Final OA 4d overdue Pending Sep 07, 2021

Managing Dorton & Willis LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month