Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026

Katz Ruby & Carle (Pst)

12 pending office actions • 1 client • 11 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 35 patents granted in the last 365 days

Quality Metrics (n=2349 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

95.6%
Allowance Rate
n=2349
+0.52σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=2349
3.2
OAs to Allowance
n=1794
-0.16σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1794
932 days
Time to Allowance
n=1794
-1.5pp
Interview Lift
n=2349
26.5%
RCE Rate
n=2349
5.8%
Appeal Rate
n=2349

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

93.8%
§101 Overcome
n=179
91.3%
§102 Overcome
n=311
90.5%
§103 Overcome
n=765
92.1%
§112 Overcome
n=178

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, H03M
Top CPC Subclasses
81%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=2349
2
Practitioners
n=2349
1174.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=2349

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (8%)
8
Medium (67%)
3
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (8%)
§103 only7 (58%)
§102 only1 (8%)
§112 only2 (17%)
Double-patenting only1 (8%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
9
Information Tech
75% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
3
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KNAPP, JUSTIN R 2 84.5% +8.3%
RUSIN, KAYO LISA 1 88.5% +17.6%
ZHAO, YU 1 52.3% +41.3%
MITIKU, BERHANU 1 55.1% +28.8%
KERVEROS, DEMETRIOS C 1 87.4% +2.6%
GIARDINO JR, MARK A 1 84.8% +2.5%
MINCEY, JERMAINE A 1 56.9% +41.8%
HERZOG, MADHURI R 1 78.2% +12.0%
HERSHLEY, MARK E 1 78.4% +19.0%
DARE, RYAN A 1 75.5% +7.3%

Quick Wins (4)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19018279 Rebuilding Encoded Data Slices via a Storage Network Processor GIARDINO JR, MARK A 14d
19295835 Storage Unit Error Identification in a Storage Network RUSIN, KAYO LISA
19023789 Managing Versioning in a Distributed Storage Network KERVEROS, DEMETRIOS C
19014578 Notification of an Unfavorable Access Pattern in a Storage Network KNAPP, JUSTIN R

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18969853 Method and Apparatus for Using Pairwise Encryption Keys in a Distributed Storage System KNAPP, JUSTIN R

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18792029 Method and Apparatus for Managing Data Integrity in a Distributed Storage Network HERSHLEY, MARK E 4d overdue
19018408 Re-Encoding Data in an Expanded Storage Pool MINCEY, JERMAINE A 20d
19295835 Storage Unit Error Identification in a Storage Network RUSIN, KAYO LISA
19263692 Storing and Processing Encrypted Data ZHAO, YU
19259357 Threshold Computing in a Dispersed Storage Network MITIKU, BERHANU
18909158 Storage Network with Time-Based Storage Access HERZOG, MADHURI R

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Pure Storage 12

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
21122
21141
21351
21591
24381
21641
21321
21371

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19295835 Storage Unit Error Identification in a Storage Network Pure Storage, Inc. RUSIN, KAYO LISA 2114 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Aug 11, 2025
19263692 Storing and Processing Encrypted Data Pure Storage, Inc. ZHAO, YU §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 09, 2025
19259357 Threshold Computing in a Dispersed Storage Network Pure Storage, Inc. MITIKU, BERHANU §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 03, 2025
19023789 Managing Versioning in a Distributed Storage Network Pure Storage, Inc. KERVEROS, DEMETRIOS C §102 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 16, 2025
19018279 Rebuilding Encoded Data Slices via a Storage Network Processor Pure Storage, Inc. GIARDINO JR, MARK A 2135 §112 Final Rejection 14d Pending Jan 13, 2025
19018408 Re-Encoding Data in an Expanded Storage Pool Pure Storage, Inc. MINCEY, JERMAINE A 2159 §103 Non-Final OA 20d Pending Jan 13, 2025
19014578 Notification of an Unfavorable Access Pattern in a Storage Network Pure Storage, Inc. KNAPP, JUSTIN R 2112 DP Non-Final OA Pending Jan 09, 2025
18969853 Method and Apparatus for Using Pairwise Encryption Keys in a Distributed Storage System Pure Storage, Inc. KNAPP, JUSTIN R 2112 §101 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 05, 2024
18909158 Storage Network with Time-Based Storage Access Pure Storage, Inc. HERZOG, MADHURI R 2438 §103 Final Rejection Pending Oct 08, 2024
18792029 Method and Apparatus for Managing Data Integrity in a Distributed Storage Network Pure Storage, Inc. HERSHLEY, MARK E 2164 §103 Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Aug 01, 2024
18192335 Managing Correlated Outages in a Dispersed Storage Network Pure Storage, Inc. DARE, RYAN A 2132 §112 Non-Final OA Pending Mar 29, 2023
17816928 Selecting a Processing Unit Based on a Data Type of an Access Request Pure Storage, Inc. THAMMAVONG, PRASITH 2137 §103 Non-Final OA 21d Pending Aug 02, 2022

Managing Katz Ruby & Carle (Pst)'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month