Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Sanders Ip Law-Nvidia

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

17 pending office actions • 1 client • 16 examiners • 14 art units • 0 of 17 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 19 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Sanders IP Law-NVIDIA has managed 1163 career applications in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 92.52 percent. Its prosecution process averages 3.5 office actions per allowance, reflecting a consistent effort to address examiner objections through multiple rounds of communication. This persistent strategy is a hallmark of the firm's approach to securing patent rights.

The firm currently has 16 pending office actions. This active workload is part of its 1163 career applications. The 92.52 percent allowance rate is a strong performance metric for the mechanical and e-commerce sectors. The 3.5 office actions per allowance figure suggests that the firm is willing to undergo an involved prosecution path to ensure its clients receive granted patents. This combination of a high success rate and a dedicated prosecution style provides significant value to applicants in these technical fields.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1163 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

92.5%
Allowance Rate
n=1163
+0.60σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1163
3.5
OAs to Allowance
n=643
+0.00σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=643
970 days
Time to Allowance
n=643
+7.6pp
Interview Lift
n=1163
42.7%
RCE Rate
n=1163
3.9%
Appeal Rate
n=1163

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

70.1%
§101 Overcome
n=214
66.7%
§102 Overcome
n=333
67.2%
§103 Overcome
n=549
72.2%
§112 Overcome
n=331

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G06Q, H04M
Top CPC Subclasses
18%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1163
1
Practitioners
n=1163
1163.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1163

Portfolio Summary

17
Total Pending OAs
10
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
4
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (4)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (24%)
13
Medium (76%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (6%)
§103 only8 (47%)
§102 only3 (18%)
Double-patenting + other2 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (18%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
6
Information Tech
35% of docket
3
Communications
18% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
41% of docket
1
Business / Other
6% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

170 h
Manual time on pending OAs
34 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
59 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
IDOWU, OLUGBENGA O 2 71.6% +19.0%
CAIN, AARON G 1 43.2% +29.5%
CODUROGLU, JALAL C 1 85.8% +7.4%
JACOB, AJITH 1 79.0% +4.1%
NGUYEN, THAN VINH 1 91.0% +4.2%
SAVENKOV, VADIM 1 60.7% +20.3%
ARMSTRONG, JONATHAN D 1 55.1% +3.6%
SHAHABI, ARI ARASTOO 1 56.7% +41.2%
EWALD, JOHN ROBERT DAKITA 1 76.7% +49.3%
SUN, JIANGENG 1 82.3% +13.4%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19093406 LOCALIZED IN-SYSTEM TESTING FOR AUTONOMOUS AND SEMI-AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS CODUROGLU, JALAL C —
18903831 ADAPTABLE DATA BUFFERING SYSTEM FOR AUTONOMOUS AND SEMI-AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS NGUYEN, THAN VINH —
18634425 DETERMINING OCCUPANCY USING SENSOR FUSION FOR AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS SUN, JIANGENG —

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18799332 OBJECT DETECTION USING ULTRASONIC SENSORS FOR AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS ARMSTRONG, JONATHAN D 9d overdue
17655776 SENSOR DATA BASED MAP CREATION AND LOCALIZATION FOR AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS COOLEY, CHASE LITTLEJOHN 15d
19278445 AUTONMOUS OR SEMI-AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE OPERATIONS CAIN, AARON G —
18662241 GENERATING ARCHITECTURAL AND BEHAVIORAL SYSTEM MODELS FOR AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS SHAHABI, ARI ARASTOO —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19278445 AUTONMOUS OR SEMI-AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE OPERATIONS CAIN, AARON G —
18806594 DEVICE INITIALIZATION AND AUTHENTICATION FOR COMPUTING SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS SAVENKOV, VADIM —
18662241 GENERATING ARCHITECTURAL AND BEHAVIORAL SYSTEM MODELS FOR AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS SHAHABI, ARI ARASTOO —
18657540 EXECUTION SCHEDULE SWITCHING FOR TASK MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING SYSTEMS EWALD, JOHN ROBERT DAKITA —
18634425 DETERMINING OCCUPANCY USING SENSOR FUSION FOR AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS SUN, JIANGENG —
18353586 PROTECTING SENSITIVE DATA ASSOCIATED WITH TRAINING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS IDOWU, OLUGBENGA O —
18333519 MODEL TRAINING USING AUGMENTED DATA FOR MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS IDOWU, OLUGBENGA O —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
NVIDIA 17

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26712
24942
36561
21611
21381
24321
36451
36971
21991
36651

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19278445 AUTONMOUS OR SEMI-AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE OPERATIONS Nvidia Corporation CAIN, AARON G 3656 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 23, 2025
19093406 LOCALIZED IN-SYSTEM TESTING FOR AUTONOMOUS AND SEMI-AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS Nvidia Corporation CODUROGLU, JALAL C §102DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 28, 2025
18909636 ORGANIZING MAPPED REGIONS INTO DISCRETIZED SEGMENTS FOR AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS Nvidia Corporation JACOB, AJITH 2161 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 08, 2024
18903831 ADAPTABLE DATA BUFFERING SYSTEM FOR AUTONOMOUS AND SEMI-AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS Nvidia Corporation NGUYEN, THAN VINH 2138 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 01, 2024
18806594 DEVICE INITIALIZATION AND AUTHENTICATION FOR COMPUTING SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS Nvidia Corporation SAVENKOV, VADIM 2432 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 15, 2024
18799332 OBJECT DETECTION USING ULTRASONIC SENSORS FOR AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS Nvidia Corporation ARMSTRONG, JONATHAN D 3645 §102§103 Final Rejection 9d overdue Pending Aug 09, 2024
18662241 GENERATING ARCHITECTURAL AND BEHAVIORAL SYSTEM MODELS FOR AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS Nvidia Corporation SHAHABI, ARI ARASTOO 3697 §101§102 Final Rejection — Pending May 13, 2024
18657540 EXECUTION SCHEDULE SWITCHING FOR TASK MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING SYSTEMS Nvidia Corporation EWALD, JOHN ROBERT DAKITA 2199 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 07, 2024
18634425 DETERMINING OCCUPANCY USING SENSOR FUSION FOR AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS Nvidia Corporation SUN, JIANGENG 2671 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 12, 2024
18403536 MAP DOWNLOAD AND STORAGE MANAGEMENT FOR AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS Nvidia Corporation JAGOLINZER, SCOTT ROSS 3665 §103 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Jan 03, 2024
18511828 PERCEPTION DIVERSITY FOR IDENTIFICATION OF OBJECTS IN ROBOTICS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS Nvidia Corporation BILODEAU, DUSTIN E 2664 §103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Nov 16, 2023
18465641 USING HIGH DEFINITION MAPS FOR GENERATING SYNTHETIC SENSOR DATA FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES Nvidia Corporation MACIOROWSKI, GODFREY ALEKSANDER 3658 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 12, 2023
18359618 ADAPTING MACHINE OPERATION BASED ON ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS FOR AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS Nvidia Corporation WHITTINGTON, JESS G 3666 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 26, 2023
18353586 PROTECTING SENSITIVE DATA ASSOCIATED WITH TRAINING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS Nvidia Corporation IDOWU, OLUGBENGA O 2494 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 17, 2023
18333519 MODEL TRAINING USING AUGMENTED DATA FOR MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS Nvidia Corporation IDOWU, OLUGBENGA O 2494 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 12, 2023
17937711 NEAREST NEIGHBOR SEARCH USING COMPRESSED OCTREES REPRESENTING HIGH DEFINITION MAPS FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES Nvidia Corporation KOETH, MICHELLE M 2671 §103DP Non-Final OA 26d Pending Oct 03, 2022
17655776 SENSOR DATA BASED MAP CREATION AND LOCALIZATION FOR AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS Nvidia Corporation COOLEY, CHASE LITTLEJOHN 3662 §102§103 Non-Final OA 15d Pending Mar 21, 2022

Managing Sanders Ip Law-Nvidia's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month