Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Sitronix Technology Corporation is currently managing 5 pending office actions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These 5 pending office actions are being handled by 5 distinct examiners, indicating that each pending matter has a unique reviewer. The portfolio is spread across 4 distinct art units, suggesting that the company's semiconductor and optics innovations are categorized into several technical groups at the patent office. This distribution requires managing five unique examiner relationships across 4 distinct art units.
The busiest examiner, BODDIE, WILLIAM, is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. With 5 distinct examiners each handling an action, the prosecution risk is evenly distributed. Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements of the 4 distinct art units involved, as the technological nuances of Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics will vary across these groups. The lack of examiner overlap means that a result with one examiner like BODDIE, WILLIAM will not predict the outcome of the other pending actions. Success for the 5 pending office actions depends on the independent reviews of the 5 distinct examiners.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (40%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 3 (60%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BODDIE, WILLIAM | 1 | 27.2% | +23.3% |
| HANUMASAGAR, SHAMITA S | 1 | 76.9% | -7.5% |
| ARONOVICH, OLGA | 1 | 75.8% | +13.0% |
| BERRY, PAUL ANTHONY | 1 | 90.2% | -1.3% |
| CHOUDHRY, MOHAMMAD M | 1 | 82.0% | +12.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18202360 | BUMP STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF | HANUMASAGAR, SHAMITA S | 86d overdue |
| 18826673 | Driving circuit for display panel | BODDIE, WILLIAM | 61d |
| 17714445 | BUMP STRUCTURE OF CHIP | BERRY, PAUL ANTHONY | — |
| 17444229 | FLOW GUIDING STRUCTURE OF CHIP | CHOUDHRY, MOHAMMAD M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18826673 | Driving circuit for display panel | BODDIE, WILLIAM | 61d |
| 18091819 | DRIVING STRUCTURE FOR DISPLAY PANEL | ARONOVICH, OLGA | — |
| 17444229 | FLOW GUIDING STRUCTURE OF CHIP | CHOUDHRY, MOHAMMAD M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2629 | 2 |
| 2814 | 1 |
| 2898 | 1 |
| 2899 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18826673 | Driving circuit for display panel | BODDIE, WILLIAM | 2629 | §103 | Final Rejection | 61d | Pending | Sep 06, 2024 |
| 18202360 | BUMP STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF | HANUMASAGAR, SHAMITA S | 2814 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 86d overdue | Pending | May 26, 2023 |
| 18091819 | DRIVING STRUCTURE FOR DISPLAY PANEL | ARONOVICH, OLGA | 2629 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 30, 2022 |
| 17714445 | BUMP STRUCTURE OF CHIP | BERRY, PAUL ANTHONY | 2898 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 06, 2022 |
| 17444229 | FLOW GUIDING STRUCTURE OF CHIP | CHOUDHRY, MOHAMMAD M | 2899 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 02, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial