Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Jeffrey J Piziali, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as PIZIALI, JEFFREY J

Tech Center 2600 • Art Units: 2625 2628 2629 2634 2693

This examiner grants 42% of resolved cases

Analysis

PIZIALI, JEFFREY J is assigned to technology center 2600 and art unit 2625. The profile records 598 resolved cases and an allowance rate of 42.5%. The case volume provides a meaningful basis for analysis, while the rate indicates that allowance is not the predominant outcome.

The median time to allowance is 1509 days. Interview lift is 5.8%, showing only a modest positive association between interviews and allowance. Interviews may still help resolve specific issues, but the data does not indicate a strong interview effect.

The recurring companies are LG Display Co., Ltd., Samsung Display Co., Ltd., and BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. The listed firms are CANTOR COLBURN LLP, Seed IP Law Group LLP and LG Display Co., Ltd., and Xsensus. Counsel should emphasize claim precision and prepare for a lengthy prosecution path.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

42.5%
Allow Rate
-19.5% vs TC avg
634
Total Applications
+5.8%
Interview Lift
1509
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 598 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

4.0%
§101 Eligibility
15.0%
§102 Novelty
37.9%
§103 Obviousness
41.8%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
19125809 DATA DRIVING APPARATUS FOR DRIVING PIXEL OF DISPLAY PANEL Non-Final OA LX SEMICON CO., LTD.
19261426 DISPLAY DEVICE AND DRIVING METHOD Final Rejection LG Display Co., Ltd.
19259215 DISPLAY DEVICE Final Rejection LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
19208245 DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME Final Rejection LG Display Co., Ltd.
19005064 DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME Non-Final OA LG Display Co., Ltd.
18749511 Light Emitting Display Apparatus Final Rejection LG Display Co., Ltd.
19278158 ELECTRONIC DEVICE Final Rejection Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
19270212 DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE Final Rejection Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
19240426 DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME Non-Final OA SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
19089000 DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME Non-Final OA Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
19027881 DISPLAY DEVICE, OPERATION METHOD OF SENSING UNIT INCLUDED THEREIN, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME Final Rejection Samsung Display Co., LTD.
18977412 DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME Final Rejection SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
18742047 DISPLAY DEVICE Non-Final OA Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
19343657 CONTROL METHOD AND DISPLAY SYSTEM Final Rejection SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION
19234385 SHIFT REGISTER UNIT, GATE DRIVING CIRCUIT AND DISPLAY SUBSTRATE Non-Final OA BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.
18768018 DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE Non-Final OA BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.
19165267 TOUCH SENSOR Final Rejection Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd.
19287119 DISPLAY DEVICE, MULTI-DISPLAY SYSTEM, AND DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD Final Rejection Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
18287545 MIRROR FOR A HEAD-UP DISPLAY Non-Final OA Continental Automotive Technologies GmbH
19164751 SCENE DESCRIPTION FRAMEWORK FOR HAPTICS INTERACTIVITY Non-Final OA InterDigital CE Patent Holdings, SAS
19289208 DETECTION DEVICE Final Rejection Magnolia White Corporation
18830235 SINGLE CHIP LED DRIVER CIRCUIT Non-Final OA Microchip Technology Inc.
18996077 SECTIONAL DRIVING Non-Final OA VueReal Inc.

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Jeffrey J Piziali's allowance rate?

42.5% of resolved applications examined by Jeffrey J Piziali were allowed (598 resolved cases), compared with 66.5% across Art Unit 2625 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Jeffrey J Piziali?

This examiner's interview lift is +5.8 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Jeffrey J Piziali take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Jeffrey J Piziali took 1,509 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Jeffrey J Piziali work in?

Jeffrey J Piziali examines applications in Art Unit 2625 in Tech Center 2600 (Communications).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month