Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Command Ip LLP

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

24 pending office actions • 9 clients • 24 examiners • 11 art units • 0 of 24 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Command IP LLP operates in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area, with 1485 career applications. The firm currently manages 17 pending office actions, reflecting their active role in the patent process. This career total of 1485 applications establishes their experience in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The 17 pending office actions are a current measure of their prosecution work.

The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 91.72 percent, a metric calculated from their 1485 career applications. This 91.72 percent rate indicates the firm's success in achieving patent grants. Prosecution requires an average of 3.0 office actions per allowance. For practitioners, this 3.0 average provides a clear expectation for the number of examiner interactions. The 17 pending office actions are managed alongside this 91.72 percent allowance rate and 3.0 office action average. These figures collectively describe the firm's historical performance and current engagement in their primary technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1485 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

91.7%
Allowance Rate
n=1485
+0.57σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1485
3.0
OAs to Allowance
n=886
-0.16σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=886
944 days
Time to Allowance
n=886
+8.0pp
Interview Lift
n=1485
19.0%
RCE Rate
n=1485
2.4%
Appeal Rate
n=1485

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

74.6%
§101 Overcome
n=118
83.3%
§102 Overcome
n=329
83.0%
§103 Overcome
n=571
83.7%
§112 Overcome
n=380

Specialization & Scale

B64U, B64C, G05D
Top CPC Subclasses
19%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1485
0
Practitioners
n=1485
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=1485 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

24
Total Pending OAs
20
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

15
Hard (62%)
6
Medium (25%)
2
Easy (8%)
1
Unknown (4%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (4%)
§101 + other4 (17%)
§103 only6 (25%)
Double-patenting only2 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)10 (42%)
No statute on record1 (4%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
8% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
4% of docket
3
Semiconductors
12% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
12
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

240 h
Manual time on pending OAs
48 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
84 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
2.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BONNETTE, RODNEY ANDREW 1 90.5% +6.4%
ALGEHAIM, MOHAMED A 1 59.0% +20.6%
DANGOL, ASHESH 1 69.1% +51.1%
TOMASZEWSKI, MICHAEL 1 47.9% +22.2%
REN, ZHUBING 1 71.6% +42.3%
LANTZ, KARSTEN FOSTER 1 100.0% +0.0%
PHAM, ANNIE 1 87.5% +14.3%
KEENAN, JAMES W 1 66.8% +24.1%
PATEL, JAIMIN GHANSHYAM 1 94.1% +11.1%
GILLENWATERS, JACKSON N 1 82.9% +12.7%

Hard Cases (15)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18202102 SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR A VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT REALITY MAPPER MAZUMDER, SAPTARSHI 31d overdue
18646384 OPERATIONAL STATUS DETERMINING APPARATUS, METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM MURSHED, OSAMAH 46d
19310380 Systems And Methods For Distributed Control Computing For A High Altitude Long Endurance Aircraft ALGEHAIM, MOHAMED A —
19245040 FUSELAGE SPINE WITH MODULAR SECTIONS AND AERO SHELL DANGOL, ASHESH —
19029452 Methods and Systems for Cloud-Based Management of Images Captured by Aerial Vehicles LANTZ, KARSTEN FOSTER —
19029329 Voronoi Cropping of Images for Post Field Generation PHAM, ANNIE —
18991036 All Encompassing Columnar Lift Assembly PATEL, JAIMIN GHANSHYAM —
18983665 Method and System For Protecting a Rotatable Shaft of a Motor from Excessive Bending Moments GILLENWATERS, JACKSON N —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19310380 Systems And Methods For Distributed Control Computing For A High Altitude Long Endurance Aircraft ALGEHAIM, MOHAMED A —
19245040 FUSELAGE SPINE WITH MODULAR SECTIONS AND AERO SHELL DANGOL, ASHESH —
19065610 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF A MEDICAL DEVICE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONNECTIVITY HUB TOMASZEWSKI, MICHAEL —
19061972 METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND DEVICES FOR MOTOR VEHICLE VOICE-ACTIVATED HORN REN, ZHUBING —
19029329 Voronoi Cropping of Images for Post Field Generation PHAM, ANNIE —
19000996 TORSION BAR BRACKET WITH BUSHING KEENAN, JAMES W —
18991036 All Encompassing Columnar Lift Assembly PATEL, JAIMIN GHANSHYAM —
18983665 Method and System For Protecting a Rotatable Shaft of a Motor from Excessive Bending Moments GILLENWATERS, JACKSON N —

Client Portfolio (9 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36632
36471
36421
36651
37451
28521
28581
28341
26121
17001

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19429552 RIB MOUNTING FLANGES FOR AN UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE AeroVironment, Inc. BONNETTE, RODNEY ANDREW 3647 Other Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 22, 2025
19310380 Systems And Methods For Distributed Control Computing For A High Altitude Long Endurance Aircraft AeroVironment, Inc. ALGEHAIM, MOHAMED A §101§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 26, 2025
19245040 FUSELAGE SPINE WITH MODULAR SECTIONS AND AERO SHELL AeroVironment, Inc. DANGOL, ASHESH 3642 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 20, 2025
19065610 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF A MEDICAL DEVICE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONNECTIVITY HUB Perin Health Devices LLC TOMASZEWSKI, MICHAEL DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 27, 2025
19061972 METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND DEVICES FOR MOTOR VEHICLE VOICE-ACTIVATED HORN Cerwin Vega, Inc. REN, ZHUBING §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 24, 2025
19029452 Methods and Systems for Cloud-Based Management of Images Captured by Aerial Vehicles AeroVironment, Inc. LANTZ, KARSTEN FOSTER 3665 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 17, 2025
19029329 Voronoi Cropping of Images for Post Field Generation AeroVironment, Inc. PHAM, ANNIE §101§102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 17, 2025
19000996 TORSION BAR BRACKET WITH BUSHING Maxon Industries, Inc. KEENAN, JAMES W §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 24, 2024
18991036 All Encompassing Columnar Lift Assembly Maxon Industries, Inc. PATEL, JAIMIN GHANSHYAM §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 20, 2024
18983665 Method and System For Protecting a Rotatable Shaft of a Motor from Excessive Bending Moments AeroVironment, Inc. GILLENWATERS, JACKSON N 3745 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 17, 2024
18962544 CLOSED SURFACE FLIGHT PATTERN GENERATION FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV) FLUX PLANE ASSESSMENT OF LARGE FACILITIES Seekops Inc. DAGER, JONATHAN M 3663 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 27, 2024
18928643 Catheter Nowwell Flow Technology AS SU, SUSAN SHAN §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 28, 2024
18899876 Serviceable Dust Filter for Optical Based Gaseous Sensors Seekops Inc. KOLB, NATHANIEL J §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 27, 2024
18895055 Method Of Managing A Fleet Of High Altitude Long Endurance Aircraft AeroVironment, Inc. PALL, CHARLES J 3663 §103 Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Sep 24, 2024
18737718 ULTRA-LIGHTWEIGHT, HANDHELD GAS LEAK DETECTION DEVICE Seekops Inc. BUTLER, KEVIN C 2852 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 07, 2024
18562667 Bus bar for contacting of battery cells accommodated in a cell holder, battery module arrangement and method for connecting a bus bar to a battery cell Webasto SE CARVALHO JR., ARMINDO §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 31, 2024
18646384 OPERATIONAL STATUS DETERMINING APPARATUS, METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM Allied Telesis Holdings K.K. MURSHED, OSAMAH 2858 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA 46d Pending Apr 25, 2024
18614239 Case lid for a case of an electric motor, case assembly having the case lid and electric motor Webasto SE SUBRAMANIAN, VISWANATHAN 2834 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 22, 2024
18293000 Battery module and battery Webasto SE HILTON, ALBERT MICHAEL §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 29, 2024
18565712 Battery and battery control method Webasto SE MERKLING, MATTHEW J §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 30, 2023
18389355 Battery for a motor vehicle Webasto SE LIN, GIGI LEE §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 14, 2023
18202102 SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR A VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT REALITY MAPPER Meetkai Inc. MAZUMDER, SAPTARSHI 2612 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 31d overdue Pending May 25, 2023
18019418 Housing for a battery module for receiving battery cells Webasto SE MELFI, OLIVIA MASON 1700 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 02, 2023
17781679 Supporting structure for receiving battery cells Webasto SE RICKMAN, HOLLY C 1785 §103 Final Rejection 22d Pending Jun 01, 2022

Managing Command Ip LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month