Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Klintworth & Rozenblat Idc

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Communications

23 pending office actions • 1 client • 22 examiners • 14 art units • 0 of 23 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 24 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Klintworth & Rozenblat IDC focuses its practice on the Networking & Security technology area, drawing on a history of 3458 career applications. The firm achieves a resolved allowance rate of 88.54 percent, which measures the frequency with which its applications result in a patent grant. This total of 3458 career applications establishes the firm's historical presence in the patent system.

The firm's prosecution process involves an average of 3.66 office actions per allowance. This metric represents the typical number of communications with patent examiners required to reach an allowance for a given application. Currently, the firm is managing 18 pending office actions, which represents the current volume of its active prosecution docket in the Networking & Security sector. These 18 pending office actions are fewer than the 3458 career applications filed by the firm.

The 88.54 percent allowance rate and the 3.66 office actions per allowance provide a data-grounded basis for evaluating the firm's prosecution performance. The 18 pending office actions show the firm's immediate focus, while the 3458 career applications document its involvement in the field over time. These figures offer a view of the firm's activity and results in Networking & Security.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=3458 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.5%
Allowance Rate
n=3458
+0.63σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=3458
3.7
OAs to Allowance
n=2040
+0.07σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=2040
1061 days
Time to Allowance
n=2040
+5.5pp
Interview Lift
n=3458
31.3%
RCE Rate
n=3458
2.3%
Appeal Rate
n=3458

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

84.4%
§101 Overcome
n=256
84.9%
§102 Overcome
n=893
84.3%
§103 Overcome
n=1509
85.4%
§112 Overcome
n=935

Specialization & Scale

H04N, H04L, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
16%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=3458
3
Practitioners
n=3458
1152.7
Apps / Practitioner
n=3458

Portfolio Summary

23
Total Pending OAs
12
Non-Final OAs
11
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (30%)
14
Medium (61%)
2
Easy (9%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only11 (48%)
§102 only2 (9%)
Double-patenting only2 (9%)
Double-patenting + other1 (4%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (30%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
13
Information Tech
57% of docket
6
Communications
26% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
4
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

230 h
Manual time on pending OAs
46 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
80 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
2.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEE, JIMMY S 2 57.7% +23.9%
PIZIALI, JEFFREY J 1 42.6% +5.5%
VO, TUNG T 1 71.0% +14.9%
PRINCE, JESSICA MARIE 1 77.3% +15.3%
GUZMAN, JAVIER O 1 82.1% +19.9%
HUANG, FRANK F 1 75.7% +15.5%
ZALALEE, SULTANA MARCIA 1 71.1% +15.2%
BOYLAN, JAMES T 1 63.2% +10.7%
BECK, LERON 1 80.2% +11.0%
TRUONG, NGUYEN T 1 82.8% +8.4%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19216385 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADAPTIVE SPATIAL CONTENT STREAMING WITH MULTIPLE LEVELS OF DETAIL AND DEGREES OF FREEDOM GUZMAN, JAVIER O —
19025682 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SELECTING A CODING MODE USED FOR ENCODING/DECODING A RESIDUAL BLOCK BECK, LERON —
19020639 LEARNING IN RAHT DOMAIN FOR POINT CLOUD ATTRIBUTE CODING TRUONG, NGUYEN T —

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18715830 TIMELINE BASED REPRESENTATION FOR HAPTIC SIGNAL SHIH, HAOSHIAN 16d
19164751 SCENE DESCRIPTION FRAMEWORK FOR HAPTICS INTERACTIVITY PIZIALI, JEFFREY J —
19015188 NEW CONDITIONAL CODING FOR LEARNING-BASED DYNAMIC POINT CLOUD CODING FRAMEWORK MAHMUD, FARHAN —
18938145 HIGH LEVEL SYNTAX DESIGN FOR RULE-BASED QUANTIZATION TECHNIQUE FOR CONTENT CODED USING LEARNING-BASED METHODS MESSMORE, JONATHAN R —
18933923 METHODS TO DESCRIBE THE HIGH-LEVEL SYNTAX DESIGN OF A BITSTREAM CARRYING DATA CODED USING LEARNING-BASED CODEC FOR POINT CLOUD CONTENT BECKER, JOSEPH W —
18858188 HAPTICS EFFECT COMPRISING A WASHOUT BLOOMQUIST, KEITH D —
18901761 SYSTEM AND METHOD TO PREVENT SURVEILLANCE AND PRESERVE PRIVACY IN VIRTUAL REALITY MAZUMDER, SAPTARSHI —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19025481 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ENCODING/DECODING AN IMAGE UNIT COMPRISING IMAGE DATA REPRESENTED BY A LUMINANCE CHANNEL AND AT LEAST ONE CHROMINANCE CHANNEL BOYLAN, JAMES T 71d
19314873 SUB-PICTURE BITSTREAM EXTRACTION AND REPOSITION VO, TUNG T —
19278375 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR REDUCING THE CODING LATENCY OF DECODER-SIDE MOTION REFINEMENT PRINCE, JESSICA MARIE —
19216385 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADAPTIVE SPATIAL CONTENT STREAMING WITH MULTIPLE LEVELS OF DETAIL AND DEGREES OF FREEDOM GUZMAN, JAVIER O —
19083252 CODING ORDER CONTROL METHOD FOR LOSSLESS POINT CLOUD COMPRESSION LEE, JIMMY S —
19105655 MISSING ATTRIBUTE VALUE TRANSMISSION FOR RENDERED VIEWPORT OF A VOLUMETRIC SCENE HUANG, FRANK F —
19044905 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ENCODING AND DECODING THREE-DIMENSIONAL SCENES IN AND FROM A DATA STREAM ZALALEE, SULTANA MARCIA —
19025682 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SELECTING A CODING MODE USED FOR ENCODING/DECODING A RESIDUAL BLOCK BECK, LERON —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
InterDigital 23

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
24834
24862
24262
26281
24251
24851
24871
24821
26121
26771

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19164751 SCENE DESCRIPTION FRAMEWORK FOR HAPTICS INTERACTIVITY Interdigital Ce Patent Holdings, SAS PIZIALI, JEFFREY J 2628 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 12, 2025
19314873 SUB-PICTURE BITSTREAM EXTRACTION AND REPOSITION Interdigital Vc Holdings, Inc. VO, TUNG T 2425 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 29, 2025
19278375 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR REDUCING THE CODING LATENCY OF DECODER-SIDE MOTION REFINEMENT Interdigital Vc Holdings, Inc. PRINCE, JESSICA MARIE DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 23, 2025
19216385 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADAPTIVE SPATIAL CONTENT STREAMING WITH MULTIPLE LEVELS OF DETAIL AND DEGREES OF FREEDOM Interdigital Vc Holdings, Inc. GUZMAN, JAVIER O DP Non-Final OA — Pending May 22, 2025
19083252 CODING ORDER CONTROL METHOD FOR LOSSLESS POINT CLOUD COMPRESSION Interdigital Vc Holdings, Inc. LEE, JIMMY S 2483 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 18, 2025
19105655 MISSING ATTRIBUTE VALUE TRANSMISSION FOR RENDERED VIEWPORT OF A VOLUMETRIC SCENE Interdigital Ce Patent Holdings, SAS HUANG, FRANK F 2485 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 21, 2025
19044905 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ENCODING AND DECODING THREE-DIMENSIONAL SCENES IN AND FROM A DATA STREAM Interdigital Vc Holdings, Inc. ZALALEE, SULTANA MARCIA §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 04, 2025
19025481 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ENCODING/DECODING AN IMAGE UNIT COMPRISING IMAGE DATA REPRESENTED BY A LUMINANCE CHANNEL AND AT LEAST ONE CHROMINANCE CHANNEL Interdigital Vc Holdings, Inc. BOYLAN, JAMES T 2486 §103 Non-Final OA 71d Pending Jan 16, 2025
19025682 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SELECTING A CODING MODE USED FOR ENCODING/DECODING A RESIDUAL BLOCK Interdigital Vc Holdings, Inc. BECK, LERON 2487 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Jan 16, 2025
19020639 LEARNING IN RAHT DOMAIN FOR POINT CLOUD ATTRIBUTE CODING Interdigital Vc Holdings, Inc. TRUONG, NGUYEN T 2486 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 14, 2025
18992903 DEEP DISTRIBUTION-AWARE POINT FEATURE EXTRACTOR FOR AI-BASED POINT CLOUD COMPRESSION Interdigital Vc Holdings, Inc. WALKER, JARED T 2426 §103 Final Rejection 12d Pending Jan 09, 2025
19015188 NEW CONDITIONAL CODING FOR LEARNING-BASED DYNAMIC POINT CLOUD CODING FRAMEWORK Interdigital Vc Holdings, Inc. MAHMUD, FARHAN 2483 §102§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 09, 2025
18938145 HIGH LEVEL SYNTAX DESIGN FOR RULE-BASED QUANTIZATION TECHNIQUE FOR CONTENT CODED USING LEARNING-BASED METHODS Interdigital Vc Holdings, Inc. MESSMORE, JONATHAN R 2482 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 05, 2024
18933923 METHODS TO DESCRIBE THE HIGH-LEVEL SYNTAX DESIGN OF A BITSTREAM CARRYING DATA CODED USING LEARNING-BASED CODEC FOR POINT CLOUD CONTENT Interdigital Vc Holdings, Inc. BECKER, JOSEPH W 2483 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 31, 2024
18858188 HAPTICS EFFECT COMPRISING A WASHOUT Interdigital Ce Patent Holdings, SAS BLOOMQUIST, KEITH D §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 18, 2024
18901761 SYSTEM AND METHOD TO PREVENT SURVEILLANCE AND PRESERVE PRIVACY IN VIRTUAL REALITY Interdigital Vc Holdings, Inc. MAZUMDER, SAPTARSHI 2612 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 30, 2024
18717706 CHROMA FORMAT ADAPTATION Interdigital Ce Patent Holdings, SAS DHOOGE, DEVIN J 2677 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 07, 2024
18715830 TIMELINE BASED REPRESENTATION FOR HAPTIC SIGNAL Interdigital Ce Patent Holdings, SAS SHIH, HAOSHIAN 2179 §102§112 Final Rejection 16d Pending Jun 03, 2024
18637370 REPRODUCIBLE LEARNING-BASED POINT CLOUD CODING Interdigital Vc Holdings, Inc. RAHAMAN, SHAHAN UR 2426 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 16, 2024
18628445 POINT CLOUD DECODER WITH 6D POSE ESTIMATION Interdigital Vc Holdings, Inc. ENG, GEORGE 2699 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 05, 2024
18511671 MULTI-FOCAL PLANES WITH VARYING POSITIONS Interdigital Vc Holdings, Inc. BEZUAYEHU, SOLOMON G 2674 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 16, 2023
18036834 SELF-SUPERVISED 3D POINT CLOUD ABSTRACTION InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc. PROVIDENCE, VINCENT ALEXANDER 2617 §103 Non-Final OA 36d overdue Pending May 12, 2023
17258702 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR FORMING EXTENDED FOCAL PLANES FOR LARGE VIEWPOINT CHANGES Interdigital Vc Holdings, Inc. LEE, JIMMY S 2483 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 07, 2021

Managing Klintworth & Rozenblat Idc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month