Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Miller Nash LLP

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

13 pending office actions • 10 clients • 13 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Miller Nash LLP operates as a patent law firm in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The firm has managed 4113 career applications, achieving a resolved allowance rate of 82.99 percent. Prosecution requires an average of 3.04 office actions per allowance to reach a grant.

There are 10 pending office actions currently active. The 3.04 average office actions per allowance reflects a typical level of interaction with the patent office in the Chemistry & Materials sector. This performance metric is based on a significant volume of 4113 career applications.

The 82.99 percent allowance rate indicates a consistent ability to obtain allowances for clients. Practitioners should note that the 3.04 average office actions per allowance provides a baseline for expected prosecution timelines. The 10 pending office actions show the firm's ongoing engagement with Chemistry & Materials matters.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=4113 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

83.0%
Allowance Rate
n=4113
+0.40σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=4113
3.0
OAs to Allowance
n=2747
-0.04σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=2747
1169 days
Time to Allowance
n=2747
+0.6pp
Interview Lift
n=4113
20.7%
RCE Rate
n=4113
2.4%
Appeal Rate
n=4113

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

81.0%
§101 Overcome
n=168
72.8%
§102 Overcome
n=782
73.8%
§103 Overcome
n=1177
80.8%
§112 Overcome
n=615

Specialization & Scale

H01L, H10D, H10W
Top CPC Subclasses
25%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=4113
4
Practitioners
n=4113
1028.2
Apps / Practitioner
n=4113

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

9
Hard (69%)
4
Medium (31%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (8%)
§103 only3 (23%)
Double-patenting + other1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)8 (62%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
46% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
8% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
15% of docket
4
Business / Other
31% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FREEMAN, JOSHUA E 1 82.0% +12.1%
MCCLURE, CHRISTINA D 1 29.9% +32.7%
TRIGGS, ANDREW J 1 66.7% +27.8%
OLIVER, BRADLEY S 1 60.9% +14.3%
MALEKZADEH, SEYED MASOUD 1 67.1% +31.9%
FERGUSON, LAWRENCE D 1 78.4% +13.2%
SIDDIQUEE, MUHAMMAD S 1 78.1% +19.8%
PAK, HANNAH J 1 78.1% +20.9%
MOK, ALEX W 1 74.3% +20.8%
ANDERSON-FEARS, KEENAN NEIL 1 12.0% +41.3%

Hard Cases (9)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18743250 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PREPARING COIR MALEKZADEH, SEYED MASOUD 155d overdue
18637286 COCONUT HARD SHELL GRANULAR INFILL FOR SYNTHETIC SPORT FIELDS FERGUSON, LAWRENCE D 30d overdue
19228474 FLASH BANG GRENADE HOOK AND METHOD OF USE FREEMAN, JOSHUA E —
19216004 METAL-FLUORIDE THIN FILMS AND DEPOSITION METHODS MCCLURE, CHRISTINA D —
18924903 SECONDARY WINDOW INSERT TRIGGS, ANDREW J —
18580879 RECONFIGURABLE SOFT LITHIUM-ION BATTERY SIDDIQUEE, MUHAMMAD S —
18522016 FAST FABRICATION OF FIBER REINFORCED POLYMERS USING SOLID EPOXY POWDER CONTAINING AN INITIATOR PAK, HANNAH J —
18253901 DEEP LEARNING TECHNIQUES FOR ELASTICITY IMAGING ANDERSON-FEARS, KEENAN NEIL —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18743250 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PREPARING COIR MALEKZADEH, SEYED MASOUD 155d overdue
18637286 COCONUT HARD SHELL GRANULAR INFILL FOR SYNTHETIC SPORT FIELDS FERGUSON, LAWRENCE D 30d overdue
18497614 METHOD TO MAKE IMPROVED ELECTRICAL STEELS MOK, ALEX W 16d
18721067 REFILLABLE PERSONAL HYGIENE PRODUCT DISPENSER OLIVER, BRADLEY S 62d
19228474 FLASH BANG GRENADE HOOK AND METHOD OF USE FREEMAN, JOSHUA E —
19216004 METAL-FLUORIDE THIN FILMS AND DEPOSITION METHODS MCCLURE, CHRISTINA D —
18924903 SECONDARY WINDOW INSERT TRIGGS, ANDREW J —
18580879 RECONFIGURABLE SOFT LITHIUM-ION BATTERY SIDDIQUEE, MUHAMMAD S —

Client Portfolio (10 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36411
37541
17541
17811
17641
28341
16151
16171
17721

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19228474 FLASH BANG GRENADE HOOK AND METHOD OF USE Icarus Precision LLC FREEMAN, JOSHUA E 3641 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 04, 2025
19216004 METAL-FLUORIDE THIN FILMS AND DEPOSITION METHODS Lotus Applied Technology, LLC MCCLURE, CHRISTINA D §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 22, 2025
18924903 SECONDARY WINDOW INSERT R Value, Inc. TRIGGS, ANDREW J §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 23, 2024
18721067 REFILLABLE PERSONAL HYGIENE PRODUCT DISPENSER Batten Industries Inc. OLIVER, BRADLEY S 3754 §103 Non-Final OA 62d Pending Jun 17, 2024
18743250 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PREPARING COIR Genus Industries, Inc. MALEKZADEH, SEYED MASOUD 1754 §102§112Other Non-Final OA 155d overdue Pending Jun 14, 2024
18637286 COCONUT HARD SHELL GRANULAR INFILL FOR SYNTHETIC SPORT FIELDS Genus Industries, LLC Dba Icoir Products Group FERGUSON, LAWRENCE D 1781 §102§103 Non-Final OA 30d overdue Pending Apr 16, 2024
18580879 RECONFIGURABLE SOFT LITHIUM-ION BATTERY The Regents of the University of California SIDDIQUEE, MUHAMMAD S §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 19, 2024
18522016 FAST FABRICATION OF FIBER REINFORCED POLYMERS USING SOLID EPOXY POWDER CONTAINING AN INITIATOR Xerox Corporation PAK, HANNAH J 1764 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 28, 2023
18497614 METHOD TO MAKE IMPROVED ELECTRICAL STEELS Xerox Corporation MOK, ALEX W 2834 §103 Final Rejection 16d Pending Oct 30, 2023
18253901 DEEP LEARNING TECHNIQUES FOR ELASTICITY IMAGING The Regents of the University of California ANDERSON-FEARS, KEENAN NEIL §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 22, 2023
18163131 LIDOCAINE SOLUTION AND FOOT WIPE Pelli Skin Co., LLC SCOTLAND, REBECCA LYNN 1615 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 01, 2023
18163153 ANTIFUNGAL SOLUTION AND FOOT WIPE Pelli Skin Co., LLC MEYERS, ELIZABETH ANNE 1617 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 01, 2023
18157311 TUNABLE, RAPID UPTAKE, AMINOPOLYMER AEROGEL SORBENT FOR DIRECT AIR CAPTURE OF CO2 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated PREGLER, SHARON 1772 §103 Final Rejection 34d Pending Jan 20, 2023

Managing Miller Nash LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month