Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Quintero Law Office, Pc

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

7 pending office actions • 4 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

QUINTERO LAW OFFICE, PC has managed 3305 career applications, with a current focus on the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The firm is presently handling 8 pending office actions, indicating a consistent level of active prosecution relative to its total application history. This volume of 8 pending office actions suggests a stable and ongoing engagement with the patent office for its current clients.

The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate pct of 81.18 across its 3305 career applications. This success is achieved with an avg office actions per allowance of 2.83. The 2.83 avg office actions per allowance provides a metric for the typical number of responses required to secure a patent grant in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics sector. The 81.18 resolved allowance rate pct serves as a reliable indicator of the firm's historical performance in converting applications into granted patents within this technical field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=3305 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

81.2%
Allowance Rate
n=3305
+0.35σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=3305
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=2494
-0.24σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=2494
1038 days
Time to Allowance
n=2494
+12.0pp
Interview Lift
n=3305
20.6%
RCE Rate
n=3305
0.6%
Appeal Rate
n=3305

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

82.7%
§101 Overcome
n=133
79.6%
§102 Overcome
n=1132
81.4%
§103 Overcome
n=1637
86.4%
§112 Overcome
n=670

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H01L, H10W
Top CPC Subclasses
20%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=3305
1
Practitioners
n=3305
3305.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=3305

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (43%)
4
Medium (57%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (43%)
§102 only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (43%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
4
Semiconductors
57% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
43% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CONLEY, FREDRICK C 2 70.6% +12.8%
ISAAC, STANETTA D 1 85.8% -36.2%
WU, JERRY 1 68.6% +20.3%
IQBAL, HAMNA FATHIMA 1 83.3% +20.0%
CULBERT, CHRISTOPHER A 1 42.2% +7.7%
ALSOMIRI, ISAM A 1 66.7% +23.5%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18193012 BACK SIDE METALLIZATION THIN FILM STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME ISAAC, STANETTA D —
17970487 MICRO LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE PACKAGE STRUCTURE IQBAL, HAMNA FATHIMA —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18069167 CASE AND RESTRICTION MECHANISM THEREOF WU, JERRY 132d overdue
18647639 INFLATABLE PRODUCT CONLEY, FREDRICK C 34d
18458974 Inflatable Product CONLEY, FREDRICK C 34d

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18069167 CASE AND RESTRICTION MECHANISM THEREOF WU, JERRY 132d overdue
18647639 INFLATABLE PRODUCT CONLEY, FREDRICK C 34d
18458974 Inflatable Product CONLEY, FREDRICK C 34d
17970487 MICRO LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE PACKAGE STRUCTURE IQBAL, HAMNA FATHIMA —
17868689 OPTICAL ACTIVITY DETECTING DEVICE ALSOMIRI, ISAM A —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36792
28981
28411
28171
28151
36001

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18647639 INFLATABLE PRODUCT Team Worldwide Corporation CONLEY, FREDRICK C 3679 §102§103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Apr 26, 2024
18458974 Inflatable Product Team Worldwide Corporation CONLEY, FREDRICK C 3679 §102§103 Final Rejection 34d Pending Aug 30, 2023
18193012 BACK SIDE METALLIZATION THIN FILM STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME AG Materials Technology Co., Ltd. ISAAC, STANETTA D 2898 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 30, 2023
18069167 CASE AND RESTRICTION MECHANISM THEREOF Wistron Corporation WU, JERRY 2841 §102§103 Final Rejection 132d overdue Pending Dec 20, 2022
17970487 MICRO LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE PACKAGE STRUCTURE Lextar Electronics Corporation IQBAL, HAMNA FATHIMA 2817 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 20, 2022
17939799 PACKAGE STRUCTURE, DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF Lextar Electronics Corporation CULBERT, CHRISTOPHER A 2815 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 07, 2022
17868689 OPTICAL ACTIVITY DETECTING DEVICE Lextar Electronics Corporation ALSOMIRI, ISAM A 3600 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 19, 2022

Managing Quintero Law Office, Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month