Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Quintero Law Office, Pc

10 pending office actions • 5 clients • 9 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 11 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 10 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
2
Due this week
0
Due this month
3
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 10 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 7 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (3)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
7
Medium (70%)
2
Easy (20%)
1
Unknown (10%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only7 (70%)
§112 only2 (20%)
No statute on record1 (10%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
10% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
10% of docket
3
Semiconductors
30% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CONLEY, FREDRICK C 2 70.7% +13.2%
KWIECINSKI, RYAN D 1 68.2% +19.7%
BUTLER, RODNEY ALLEN 1 88.2% +11.1%
CHRISTY, KATHERINE A 1 75.1% +34.9%
DULANEY, KATHLEEN YUAN 1 77.1% +23.7%
WU, JERRY 1 68.3% +20.3%
MEHTA, RATISHA 1 89.5% +6.4%
EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH 1 10.0% +29.9%
BOYLE, ABBIGALE A 1 60.5% +13.0%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18078018 LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND FORMING METHOD THEREOF MEHTA, RATISHA 5d
18302727 AUTOMATIC SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF BUTLER, RODNEY ALLEN 33d

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17846957 METHOD AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FOR ESTABLISHING DECISION TREE FOR DISEASE PREDICTION EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH 65d

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18069167 CASE AND RESTRICTION MECHANISM THEREOF WU, JERRY 132d overdue
18085057 METHOD FOR IDENTITY VERIFICATION DULANEY, KATHLEEN YUAN 46d overdue
18459372 Foldable Supporting Device KWIECINSKI, RYAN D 45d overdue
15931525 ENCAPSULATION STRUCTURE BOYLE, ABBIGALE A 7d
18302727 AUTOMATIC SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF BUTLER, RODNEY ALLEN 33d
18647639 INFLATABLE PRODUCT CONLEY, FREDRICK C 34d
18458974 Inflatable Product CONLEY, FREDRICK C 34d
17846957 METHOD AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FOR ESTABLISHING DECISION TREE FOR DISEASE PREDICTION EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH 65d

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36792
36351
36661
17841
26661
28411
28171
36871
28991

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18647639 INFLATABLE PRODUCT Team Worldwide Corporation CONLEY, FREDRICK C 3679 §103 Final Rejection 34d Pending Apr 26, 2024
18459372 Foldable Supporting Device Team Worldwide Corporation KWIECINSKI, RYAN D 3635 §112 Non-Final OA 45d overdue Pending Aug 31, 2023
18458974 Inflatable Product Team Worldwide Corporation CONLEY, FREDRICK C 3679 §103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Aug 30, 2023
18302727 AUTOMATIC SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF Wistron Corporation BUTLER, RODNEY ALLEN 3666 §103 Non-Final OA 33d Pending Apr 18, 2023
18192991 NANO-TWINNED ULTRA-THIN METALLIC FILM STRUCTURE AND METHODS FOR FORMING THE SAME AG Materials Technology Co., Ltd. CHRISTY, KATHERINE A 1784 §112 Non-Final OA 77d Pending Mar 30, 2023
18085057 METHOD FOR IDENTITY VERIFICATION Industrial Technology Research Institute DULANEY, KATHLEEN YUAN 2666 §103 Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Dec 20, 2022
18069167 CASE AND RESTRICTION MECHANISM THEREOF Wistron Corporation WU, JERRY 2841 §103 Final Rejection 132d overdue Pending Dec 20, 2022
18078018 LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND FORMING METHOD THEREOF Lextar Electronics Corporation MEHTA, RATISHA 2817 §103 Non-Final OA 5d Pending Dec 08, 2022
17846957 METHOD AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FOR ESTABLISHING DECISION TREE FOR DISEASE PREDICTION Wistron Corporation EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH 3687 Non-Final OA 65d Pending Jun 22, 2022
15931525 ENCAPSULATION STRUCTURE Industrial Technology Research Institute BOYLE, ABBIGALE A 2899 §103 Non-Final OA 7d Pending May 13, 2020

Managing Quintero Law Office, Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month