Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Quintero Law Office, Pc

7 pending office actions • 5 clients • 7 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Quality Metrics (n=3305 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

81.2%
Allowance Rate
n=3305
+0.35σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=3305
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=2495
-0.25σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=2495
1038 days
Time to Allowance
n=2495
+12.1pp
Interview Lift
n=3305
20.6%
RCE Rate
n=3305
0.6%
Appeal Rate
n=3305

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

82.7%
§101 Overcome
n=133
79.7%
§102 Overcome
n=1131
81.4%
§103 Overcome
n=1637
86.4%
§112 Overcome
n=670

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H01L, H10W
Top CPC Subclasses
20%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=3305
1
Practitioners
n=3305
3305.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=3305

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (29%)
4
Medium (57%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (14%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (43%)
§102 only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (29%)
No statute on record1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
5
Semiconductors
71% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
29% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KWIECINSKI, RYAN D 1 68.4% +19.5%
ISAAC, STANETTA D 1 85.6% -36.9%
WU, JERRY 1 68.4% +20.1%
IQBAL, HAMNA FATHIMA 1 82.4% +21.4%
CULBERT, CHRISTOPHER A 1 42.3% +6.7%
EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH 1 14.8% +37.4%
BOYLE, ABBIGALE A 1 60.3% +12.5%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18193012 BACK SIDE METALLIZATION THIN FILM STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME ISAAC, STANETTA D
17970487 MICRO LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE PACKAGE STRUCTURE IQBAL, HAMNA FATHIMA

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18069167 CASE AND RESTRICTION MECHANISM THEREOF WU, JERRY 132d overdue
15931525 ENCAPSULATION STRUCTURE BOYLE, ABBIGALE A 7d
17846957 METHOD AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FOR ESTABLISHING DECISION TREE FOR DISEASE PREDICTION EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH 65d

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18069167 CASE AND RESTRICTION MECHANISM THEREOF WU, JERRY 132d overdue
18459372 Foldable Supporting Device KWIECINSKI, RYAN D 45d overdue
15931525 ENCAPSULATION STRUCTURE BOYLE, ABBIGALE A 7d
17846957 METHOD AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FOR ESTABLISHING DECISION TREE FOR DISEASE PREDICTION EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH 65d
17970487 MICRO LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE PACKAGE STRUCTURE IQBAL, HAMNA FATHIMA

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36351
28981
28411
28171
28151
36871
28991

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18459372 Foldable Supporting Device Team Worldwide Corporation KWIECINSKI, RYAN D 3635 §102 Final Rejection 45d overdue Pending Aug 31, 2023
18193012 BACK SIDE METALLIZATION THIN FILM STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME AG Materials Technology Co., Ltd. ISAAC, STANETTA D 2898 §103 Final Rejection Pending Mar 30, 2023
18069167 CASE AND RESTRICTION MECHANISM THEREOF Wistron Corporation WU, JERRY 2841 §102§103 Final Rejection 132d overdue Pending Dec 20, 2022
17970487 MICRO LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE PACKAGE STRUCTURE Lextar Electronics Corporation IQBAL, HAMNA FATHIMA 2817 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 20, 2022
17939799 PACKAGE STRUCTURE, DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF Lextar Electronics Corporation CULBERT, CHRISTOPHER A 2815 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 07, 2022
17846957 METHOD AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FOR ESTABLISHING DECISION TREE FOR DISEASE PREDICTION Wistron Corporation EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH 3687 Non-Final OA 65d Pending Jun 22, 2022
15931525 ENCAPSULATION STRUCTURE Industrial Technology Research Institute BOYLE, ABBIGALE A 2899 §103§112 Non-Final OA 7d Pending May 13, 2020

Managing Quintero Law Office, Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month