Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 4 clients • 4 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (80%) |
| §112 only | 1 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WONG, JESSICA BOWEN | 2 | 66.7% | +21.3% |
| MILLER, WILLIAM L | 1 | 79.0% | +14.5% |
| VOORHEES, CATHERINE M | 1 | 83.3% | +14.4% |
| TOMBERS, JOSEPH A | 1 | 46.2% | +31.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18621907 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR THE DELIVERY OF ELECTRICAL CURRENT TO AN ORAL CAVITY | VOORHEES, CATHERINE M | 9d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18742781 | ANIMAL FEEDER SYSTEM | WONG, JESSICA BOWEN | 86d overdue |
| 18782089 | ANIMAL FEEDER SYSTEM WITH OPPOSED OPENABLE DOORS | WONG, JESSICA BOWEN | 70d overdue |
| 18621907 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR THE DELIVERY OF ELECTRICAL CURRENT TO AN ORAL CAVITY | VOORHEES, CATHERINE M | 9d overdue |
| 18054386 | Systems and Methods Related to Electrical Stimulation of Mammalian Meridians | TOMBERS, JOSEPH A | 12d |
| 18814028 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS RELATED TO MODULAR RECEPTACLES | MILLER, WILLIAM L | 15d |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| DEADFALL LLC | 2 |
| Latitude Corp | 1 |
| JODI VENTURES, INC. | 1 |
| NINURTA INC. | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3644 | 2 |
| 3677 | 1 |
| 3792 | 1 |
| 3791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18814028 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS RELATED TO MODULAR RECEPTACLES | Latitude Corp. | MILLER, WILLIAM L | 3677 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 15d | Pending | Aug 23, 2024 |
| 18782089 | ANIMAL FEEDER SYSTEM WITH OPPOSED OPENABLE DOORS | Deadfall LLC | WONG, JESSICA BOWEN | 3644 | §103 | Final Rejection | 70d overdue | Pending | Jul 24, 2024 |
| 18742781 | ANIMAL FEEDER SYSTEM | Deadfall LLC | WONG, JESSICA BOWEN | 3644 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 86d overdue | Pending | Jun 13, 2024 |
| 18621907 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR THE DELIVERY OF ELECTRICAL CURRENT TO AN ORAL CAVITY | Jodi Ventures, Inc. | VOORHEES, CATHERINE M | 3792 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 9d overdue | Pending | Mar 29, 2024 |
| 18054386 | Systems and Methods Related to Electrical Stimulation of Mammalian Meridians | Ninurta Inc. | TOMBERS, JOSEPH A | 3791 | §103 | Final Rejection | 12d | Pending | Nov 10, 2022 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial