Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Wolter Vandyke Davis, Pllc Mail Stop AG

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

16 pending office actions • 1 client • 16 examiners • 12 art units • 0 of 16 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 42 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Wolter VanDyke Davis, PLLC Mail Stop AG operates in the Chemistry & Materials sector, with 3418 career applications on record. The firm currently has 15 pending office actions. It maintains a resolved allowance rate of 85.29 percent, which indicates a strong track record of securing patent protection for chemical and material innovations. The firm averages 3.29 office actions per allowance, suggesting a prosecution process that typically requires three to four rounds of communication with examiners.

This average of 3.29 reflects a persistent effort to overcome rejections and achieve the 85.29 percent allowance rate. The 3418 career applications demonstrate the firm's extensive experience in navigating the specific requirements of the Chemistry & Materials technology area. For practitioners, the 15 pending office actions represent a manageable current docket. The firm's ability to maintain an 85.29 percent allowance rate while averaging 3.29 office actions per allowance across 3418 career applications highlights its proficiency in handling complex chemical patent matters and its success in achieving favorable outcomes for its clients.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=3418 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

85.3%
Allowance Rate
n=3418
+0.65σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=3418
3.3
OAs to Allowance
n=1995
-0.20σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1995
1079 days
Time to Allowance
n=1995
+12.8pp
Interview Lift
n=3418
22.7%
RCE Rate
n=3418
1.8%
Appeal Rate
n=3418

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

77.9%
§101 Overcome
n=258
80.2%
§102 Overcome
n=957
81.6%
§103 Overcome
n=1534
82.6%
§112 Overcome
n=1382

Specialization & Scale

F01D, F05D, A61K
Top CPC Subclasses
17%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=3418
3
Practitioners
n=3418
1139.3
Apps / Practitioner
n=3418

Portfolio Summary

16
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
5
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (50%)
7
Medium (44%)
1
Easy (6%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (19%)
§103 only6 (38%)
§102 only1 (6%)
§112 only1 (6%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (31%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
38% of docket
2
Information Tech
12% of docket
1
Communications
6% of docket
2
Semiconductors
12% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
1
Business / Other
6% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

160 h
Manual time on pending OAs
32 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
56 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FREJD, RUSSELL WARREN 1 91.4% +7.3%
SHEIKH, ASFAND M 1 46.1% +48.3%
HAMMOND III, THOMAS M 1 75.8% +29.3%
ZIMMERMAN, JOSHUA D 1 40.9% +15.7%
CHUNG, MONG-SHUNE 1 76.3% +22.5%
BUDISALICH, ANDREW STEVEN 1 81.3% +11.7%
LINDSAY, BERNARD G 1 68.2% +46.9%
STILES, JACOB BENJAMIN 1 0.0% +0.0%
FIGG, TRAVIS M 1 61.6% +17.2%
HEVEY, JOHN A 1 61.6% +19.9%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18875928 REPAIR METHOD OF COMPONENTS OF CONTINUOUS FLOW ENGINES FREJD, RUSSELL WARREN —

Hard Cases (9)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18274998 CONTINUOUS FLOW ENGINE SKID COMPONENT SYSTEM FIGG, TRAVIS M 26d overdue
18854525 CONTINUOUS FLOW ENGINE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULING AND PROGNOSIS SYSTEM SHEIKH, ASFAND M 2d overdue
17787127 SCANNING STRATEGY FOR VOLUME SUPPORT IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING MILLS JR., JOE E 54d
18269552 SUPPORT STRATEGY FOR THIN-WALLED ADDITIVE STRUCTURE HEVEY, JOHN A 60d
18727082 METHOD FOR CONFIGURING A CONTROL NETWORK, AND CONTROL NETWORK, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM CHUNG, MONG-SHUNE —
18709489 METHOD SEQUENCE FOR AUTOMATED NONDESTRUCTIVE MATERIAL TESTING BUDISALICH, ANDREW STEVEN —
18559044 ALLOY, POWDER, METHOD AND COMPONENT STILES, JACOB BENJAMIN —
18266980 IRRADIATION STRATEGY IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING WITH PULSED IRRADIATION WUNDERLICH, ERWIN J —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18274998 CONTINUOUS FLOW ENGINE SKID COMPONENT SYSTEM FIGG, TRAVIS M 26d overdue
18854525 CONTINUOUS FLOW ENGINE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULING AND PROGNOSIS SYSTEM SHEIKH, ASFAND M 2d overdue
18269552 SUPPORT STRATEGY FOR THIN-WALLED ADDITIVE STRUCTURE HEVEY, JOHN A 60d
18851123 INSPECTION DEVICE HAMMOND III, THOMAS M —
18729575 3D SCREEN PRINTING PRINTER AND 3D SCREEN PRINTING METHOD ZIMMERMAN, JOSHUA D —
18727082 METHOD FOR CONFIGURING A CONTROL NETWORK, AND CONTROL NETWORK, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM CHUNG, MONG-SHUNE —
18709489 METHOD SEQUENCE FOR AUTOMATED NONDESTRUCTIVE MATERIAL TESTING BUDISALICH, ANDREW STEVEN —
18574135 QUALITY ASSURANCE IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING MONITORING LINDSAY, BERNARD G —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Siemens Energy 16

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17332
17352
37612
36611
36261
28531
21181
26621
21191
17831

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18875928 REPAIR METHOD OF COMPONENTS OF CONTINUOUS FLOW ENGINES Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. Kg FREJD, RUSSELL WARREN 3661 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 17, 2024
18854525 CONTINUOUS FLOW ENGINE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULING AND PROGNOSIS SYSTEM Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. Kg SHEIKH, ASFAND M 3626 §101§102§103 Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending Oct 05, 2024
18851123 INSPECTION DEVICE Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. Kg HAMMOND III, THOMAS M §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 26, 2024
18729575 3D SCREEN PRINTING PRINTER AND 3D SCREEN PRINTING METHOD Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. Kg ZIMMERMAN, JOSHUA D 2853 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 17, 2024
18727082 METHOD FOR CONFIGURING A CONTROL NETWORK, AND CONTROL NETWORK, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. Kg CHUNG, MONG-SHUNE 2118 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 06, 2024
18709489 METHOD SEQUENCE FOR AUTOMATED NONDESTRUCTIVE MATERIAL TESTING Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. Kg BUDISALICH, ANDREW STEVEN 2662 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 11, 2024
18574135 QUALITY ASSURANCE IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING MONITORING Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. Kg LINDSAY, BERNARD G 2119 §112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 26, 2023
18559044 ALLOY, POWDER, METHOD AND COMPONENT Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. Kg STILES, JACOB BENJAMIN 1733 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 04, 2023
18274998 CONTINUOUS FLOW ENGINE SKID COMPONENT SYSTEM Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. Kg FIGG, TRAVIS M 1783 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 26d overdue Pending Jul 29, 2023
18269552 SUPPORT STRATEGY FOR THIN-WALLED ADDITIVE STRUCTURE Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. Kg HEVEY, JOHN A 1735 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 60d Pending Jun 24, 2023
18266980 IRRADIATION STRATEGY IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING WITH PULSED IRRADIATION Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. Kg WUNDERLICH, ERWIN J 3761 §101§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 13, 2023
18266595 ADDITIVELY MANUFACTURED POROUS COMPONENT STRUCTURE AND MEANS FOR MANUFACTURING SAME Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. Kg JANSSEN, REBECCA 1733 §103 Non-Final OA 26d overdue Pending Jun 12, 2023
18039053 METHOD FOR DETECTING DEFECTS IN A 3D PRINTER USING IMAGE SPATIAL RESOLUTION Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. Kg LEE, HWA S 2877 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 26, 2023
18030852 OPERATING AN ELECTROLYSIS DEVICE Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. Kg JEBUTU, MOFOLUWASO SIMILOLUWA 1795 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 07, 2023
17640683 NICKEL-BASED ALLOY FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, METHOD AND PRODUCT Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. Kg SMITH, CATHERINE P 1735 §103 Final Rejection 42d overdue Pending Jul 17, 2022
17787127 SCANNING STRATEGY FOR VOLUME SUPPORT IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. Kg MILLS JR., JOE E 3761 §102§103 Non-Final OA 54d Pending Jun 17, 2022

Managing Wolter Vandyke Davis, Pllc Mail Stop AG's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month