Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
8 pending office actions • 5 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 22 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 7 (88%) |
| §102 only | 1 (12%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOGALE, AMEN W | 3 | 74.5% | +4.5% |
| YANG, NAN-YING | 1 | 77.3% | +8.9% |
| ONYEKABA, AMY | 1 | 84.1% | +6.3% |
| SHRESTHA, SAGAR | 1 | 83.8% | +12.7% |
| PUNCHBEDDELL, SEYON ALI-SIMAH | 1 | 76.3% | +6.4% |
| BRADFORD, PETER | 1 | 80.1% | +4.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19242995 | DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DRIVING DISPLAY PANEL | ONYEKABA, AMY | 5d overdue |
| 17821877 | DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS | BRADFORD, PETER | 9d |
| 18644122 | DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING SUPPORTING PLATFORM ON BEZEL | SHRESTHA, SAGAR | 30d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18644122 | DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING SUPPORTING PLATFORM ON BEZEL | SHRESTHA, SAGAR | 30d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2628 | 4 |
| 2629 | 1 |
| 2841 | 1 |
| 2893 | 1 |
| 2897 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19254022 | SCANNING CIRCUIT, DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE | YANG, NAN-YING | 2629 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 4d overdue | Pending | Jun 30, 2025 |
| 19242995 | DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DRIVING DISPLAY PANEL | ONYEKABA, AMY | 2628 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 5d overdue | Pending | Jun 19, 2025 |
| 18984723 | DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS | BOGALE, AMEN W | 2628 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 17d overdue | Pending | Dec 17, 2024 |
| 18984756 | DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS | BOGALE, AMEN W | 2628 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 23d | Pending | Dec 17, 2024 |
| 18984733 | DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS | BOGALE, AMEN W | 2628 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 22d | Pending | Dec 17, 2024 |
| 18644122 | DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING SUPPORTING PLATFORM ON BEZEL | SHRESTHA, SAGAR | 2841 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 30d | Pending | Apr 24, 2024 |
| 18466853 | DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE | PUNCHBEDDELL, SEYON ALI-SIMAH | 2893 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 31d overdue | Pending | Sep 14, 2023 |
| 17821877 | DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS | BRADFORD, PETER | 2897 | §103 | Final Rejection | 9d | Pending | Aug 24, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial